|
|
This article or section is in need of attention from an expert on the subject.
WikiProject Virus may be able to help recruit one.
If a more appropriate WikiProject or portal exists, please adjust
this template accordingly.
|
Rinderpest is an infectious viral disease
of cattle, domestic buffalo, and some species of wildlife. It is commonly referred to as cattle plague or steppe
murrain. The disease is characterized by fever, oral erosions,
diarrhea, lymphoid necrosis, and high mortality. In German, Rinderpest means
cattle-plague.
The virus
As it is a Morbillivirus, the rinderpest virus (RPV) is closely related to the
measles and canine distemper viruses[1]. Despite its extreme lethality, the germ is
particularly fragile and is quickly inactivated by heat, desiccation and sunlight[2].
The disease
Death rates during outbreaks are usually extremely high, approaching 100%[3]. The disease is mainly spread by direct contact and by drinking contaminated water, although it can
also by transmitted by air[4].
Initial symptoms include fever, loss of appetite, and nasal and eye discharges. Subsequently, irregular erosions appear in the
mouth, the lining of the nose, and the genital tract[3]. Acute diarrhoea, preceded by constipation, is a common feature as well[4]. Most animals die 6-12 days after the onset of these clinical
signs[3].
History
Epidemics
Cattle plagues recurred throughout history, often accompanying wars and military campaigns. It hit especially hard in the 18th
century, with three long pandemics in the years 1709-1720,
1742-1760, and 1768-1786[5]. Later in history, an
outbreak in the 1890s killed 80 to 90 percent of all cattle in Southern Africa. Sir Arnold
Theiler was instrumental in developing a vaccine that curbed the epidemic. More recently, another rinderpest outbreak that
raged across much of Africa in 1982-84 is estimated to have cost at least US$500 million in stock losses.
Inoculation
In the early 18th century, the disease was seen as similar to smallpox, due to its analogous
symptoms. The personal physician of the Pope, Giovanni Maria Lancisi, recommended the slaughter
of all infected and exposed animals. This policy was not very popular and used only sparingly in the first part of the century.
Later, it was used successfully in several countries, although it was sometimes seen as too costly or drastic, and depended on a
strong central authority to be effected (something which was notably lacking in the Dutch
Republic). Because of these downsides, numerous attempts were made to inoculate
animals against the disease. These attempts met with varying success, but the procedure was not widely used and was no longer
practised at all in 19th-century Western or Central Europe. Rinderpest was an immense problem, but inoculation was not a valid
solution: In many cases, it caused too many losses. Even more importantly, it perpetuated the circulation of the virus in the
cattle population. The pioneers of inoculation did contribute significantly to our knowledge about infectious diseases. Their
experiments confirmed the concepts of those who saw infectious diseases as caused by specific agents, and were the first to
recognise maternally derived immunity[1].
Early English experimentation
The first written report of rinderpest inoculation was published in a letter signed 'T.S.' in the November 1754 issue of Gentleman's Magazine[1], a widely-read journal which also supported the progress of smallpox
inoculation. This letter reported that a Mr. Dobsen had inoculated his cattle and had thus preserved nine out of ten of them,
although this was retracted in the next issue as it was apparently a Sir William St. Quintin who had done the inoculating (this
was done by placing bits of material previously dipped in morbid discharge into an incision made
in the dewlap of the animal). These letters encouraged further application of inoculation in the
fight against diseases. The first inoculation against measles was made three years after their publication[1].
From early 1755 onwards, experiments were taking place in the Netherlands as well, results of which were also published in
Gentleman's Magazine. As in England, the disease was seen as analogous with smallpox. While these experiments were reasonably
successful, they did not have a significant impact: The total number of inoculations in England appears to have been very
limited, and after 1780 the English interest in inoculation disappeared almost entirely[1]. Almost all further experimentation was done in the Netherlands, Northern
Germany and Denmark.
Further trials in the Netherlands
Due to a very severe outbreak at the end of the 1760s, some of the biggest names in Dutch medicine became involved in the
struggle against the disease. Several independent trials were begun, most notably by Pieter
Camper in Groningen and Friesland. The results of
his experiment in Friesland were encouraging, but they proved to be the exception: testing by others in the provinces of
Utrecht, Leeuwarden and Friesland obtained disastrous
results. As a result, the Friesian authorities concluded in 1769 that the cause of rinderpest was God's displeasure with the
sinful behaviour of the Friesian people, and proclaimed 15 November a day of fasting and prayer. Interest in inoculation declined
sharply across the country[1].
In this climate of discouragement and scepticism, Geert Reinders, a farmer in the province of
Groningen and a self-taught man, decided to continue the experiments. He collaborated with Wijnold
Munniks, who had supervised earlier trials. They tried different inoculation procedures and a variety of treatments to
lighten the symptoms, all of them without significant effect. Although they were not able to perfect the inoculation procedure,
they did make some useful observations[1].
Reinders resumed his experiments in 1774, concentrating on the inoculation of calves from cows that had recovered from
rinderpest. He was probably the first to make practical use of maternally derived immunity[1]. The detailed results of his trials were published in 1776 and reprinted
in 1777. His inoculation procedure did not differ much from what had been used previously, except for the use of three separate
inoculations at an early age. This produced far better results, and the publication of his work renewed interest in inoculation.
For the period of 1777 to 1781, 89% of inoculated animals survived, compared to a 29% survival rate after natural
infection[1].
In the Netherlands too, interest in rinderpest inoculation declined in the 1780s because the disease itself decreased in
intensity.
In other countries
Apart from the Dutch republic, the only other regions where inoculation was used to any significant level were Northern
Germany and Denmark. Experiments started in Mecklenburg during the epizootic of the late
1770s. 'Insurance companies' were created which provided inoculation in special 'institutes'. Although these were private
initiatives, they were created with full encouragement from the authorities. Even though neighbouring states followed this
practice with interest, the practice never caught on outside of Mecklenburg: many were still opposed to inoculation[1].
While some experimentation occurred in other countries (most extensively in Denmark), in the majority of European countries
the struggle against the disease was based on stomping it out. Sometimes this could be done with minimal sacrifices, at other
times, it required slaughter at a massive scale[1].
Vaccination
Dr. Walter Plowright was awarded the World Food
Prize in 1999, for developing a vaccine against rinderpest. The Plowright vaccine was developed to the RBOK of the
rinderpest virus.[6]
The FAO predicts that with vaccination the cattle plague will be
eradicated by 2010[7].
References
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Huygelen, C. (1997). "The
Immunization of Cattle against Rinderpest in Eighteenth-Century Europe" (PDF). Medical History 41: 182–196. Retrieved on 2007-06-06.
- ^ http://www.iah.bbsrc.ac.uk/schools/factfiles/rinderpest.htm
- ^ a b c http://www2.dpi.qld.gov.au/health/3957.html
- ^ a b http://www.fao.org/News/1996/960804-E.HTM
- ^ Broad, J. (1983). "Cattle Plague in Eighteenth-Century England".
Agricultural History Review 32(2): 104–115. Retrieved on 2007-07-15.
- ^ Plowright, W. & Ferris, R. D. (1962). Studies with rinderpest virus in
tissue culture. The use of attenuated culture virus as a vaccine for cattle. Res Vet Sci 3, 172–182.
- ^ http://www.fao.org/docrep/X3444e/x3444e05.htm
External links
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)