Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Email
Answers.com

Roosevelt Corollary

 
US Military Dictionary: Roosevelt Corollary

A declaration made by President Theodore Roosevelt in December 1904 and based on the Monroe Doctrine. It authorized U.S. intervention in the affairs of neighboring American countries in order to counter threats posed to U.S. security and interests. After Woodrow Wilson used it in an attempt to establish a democratic government in Mexico, it was challenged by Republicans in a memorandum of December 17, 1928, and later by Democrats, in favor of a policy of non-intervention.

See the Introduction, Abbreviations and Pronunciation for further details.

Search unanswered questions...
Enter a question here...
Search: All sources Community Q&A Reference topics
US History Encyclopedia: Roosevelt Corollary
Top

Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine, a unilateral declaration claiming a U.S. prerogative of exercising "international police power" in the Western Hemisphere, was first set forth by President Theodore Roosevelt on 20 May 1904 in a public letter to Secretary of War Elihu Root. Roosevelt was particularly alarmed in 1902 by the blockade and bombardment of Venezuela by Germany and Great Britain, writing Root, "Brutal wrongdoing, or an impotence which results in a general loosening of the ties of civilizing society, may finally require intervention by some civilized nation; and in the Western Hemisphere the United States cannot ignore this duty." In his annual messages of 6 December 1904 and 5 December 1905, he invoked the Monroe Doctrine in this regard. In March 1905, in order to forestall forced debt collection in Santo Domingo by Italy, France, and Belgium, he appointed a collector of customs in that indebted nation and established a de facto protectorate. Never before had the Monroe Doctrine, itself a unilateral pronouncement, been used to forbid temporary European intervention in order to collect debts or honor international obligations. During the presidencies of William Howard Taft and Woodrow Wilson, intervention in Honduras, the Dominican Republic, Haiti, and Nicaragua was defended on the basis of the Roosevelt Corollary.

Bibliography

Collin, Richard H. Theodore Roosevelt's Caribbean: The Panama Canal, the Monroe Doctrine, and the Latin American Context. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1990.

Munro, Dana G. Intervention and Dollar Diplomacy in the Caribbean, 1900–1921. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1964.

Wikipedia: Roosevelt Corollary
Top
A political cartoonists' commentary on Roosevelt's "big stick" policy.

The Roosevelt Corollary was a substantial amendment to the Monroe Doctrine by U.S. President Theodore Roosevelt in 1904. Roosevelt's extension of the Monroe Doctrine asserted the right of the United States to intervene to stabilize the economic affairs of small states in the Caribbean and Central America if they were unable to pay their international debts. The alternative was intervention by European powers, especially Britain and Germany, which loaned money to the countries that did not repay. The catalyst of the new policy was Germany's aggressiveness in the Venezuela Affair of 1902-03. (Marks 1979)

Contents

Overview

Mitchener and Weidenmier (2006) show the economic benefits to the small countries. The average debt price for countries under the US "sphere of influence" rose by 74% in response to the pronouncement and actions to make it credible. That is, their bonds rose 74% because buyers now believed they would be repaid. The increase in financial stability reduced internal conflict because political factions could not count on winning control of the national treasury if they won a civil war. The program spurred export growth and better fiscal management, but debt settlements were driven primarily by gunboat diplomacy.

Roosevelt's December 1904 Annual message to Congress declared:

All that this country desires is to see the neighboring countries stable, orderly, and prosperous. Any country whose people conduct themselves well can count upon our hearty friendship. If a nation shows that it knows how to act with reasonable efficiency and decency in social and political matters, if it keeps order and pays its obligations, it need fear no interference from the United States. Chronic wrongdoing, or an impotence which results in a general loosening of the ties of civilized society, may in America, as elsewhere, ultimately require intervention by some civilized nation, and in the Western Hemisphere the adherence of the United States to the Monroe Doctrine may force the United States, however reluctantly, in flagrant cases of such wrongdoing or impotence, to the exercise of an international police power.

Shift to the "Good Neighbor" policy

Presidents cited the Roosevelt Corollary as justification for U.S. intervention in Cuba (1906-1910), Nicaragua (1909-1911, 1912-1925 and 1926-1933), Haiti (1915-1934), and the Dominican Republic (1916-1924).

In 1928, under President Calvin Coolidge, the Clark Memorandum stated that the U.S. did not have the right to intervene unless there was a threat by European powers, reversing the Roosevelt Corollary. In 1934, Franklin D. Roosevelt further renounced interventionism and established his "Good Neighbor policy," unchallenging the emergence of dictatorships like that of Batista in Cuba or Trujillo in the Dominican Republic.

Criticism

The argument made by Mitchener and Weidenmier (2006) in support of the Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine has been criticized on the grounds that it "represent[s] the one-sided approach that some scholars bring to the study of imperialistic and hegemonic interventions and also highlight how arguments for the general utility of imperialism are increasingly made and accepted." Christopher Coyne and Stephen Davies in "Nineteen Public Bads of Empire, Nation Building, and the Like" list public bads associated with imperialist foreign intervention such as advocated in the Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine:

  1. Increase in paternalism at home
  2. Diverts attention away from liberty at home to foreign policy
  3. Imperial overreach: Military spending grows and bankrupts intervening imperialist nations
  4. Protectionism and lobbying for future intervention by domestic interests increases
  5. Corrupt and incompetent "client ruling elites" tend to be installed by imperialist intervention (e.g. The Dominican Republic, Haiti, Nicaragua, El Salvador)
  6. Power is consolidated in client ruling elites and development is inhibited
  7. Short-term stability is traded for long-term instability
  8. Client ruling elites have incentives to quash economic and social development
  9. Increase in crony capitalism (e.g., Philippines)
  10. Protectionism, changes in the monetary system, militarism, and war reduce cooperation of economic agents
  11. Costs are imposed on "ordinary people" such as direct taxes and punishing protectionism
  12. Promotes zero-sum thinking among elites
  13. Promotes "bellicose masculinity", xenophobia, and racism (e.g., Teddy Roosevelt)
  14. Increases organized crime such as drug trade (e.g., Andes, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Burma)
  15. Failed states may be the result of earlier imperialism (e.g., Somalia, all of Africa, Latin America countries)
  16. Military force becomes the means of settling disputes
  17. Inhibits social and political change, as well as competition among elites
  18. Can inflame ethnic and religious conflicts
  19. Breeds distrust and lack of confidence in internal political institutions

See also

Bibliography

  • Coyne, C.J., Davies, S. (2007). Empire: Public Goods and Bads. Econ Journal Watch, 4(1), 3-45.
  • Glickman, Robert Jay. Norteamérica vis-à-vis Hispanoamérica: ¿opposición o asociación? Toronto: Canadian Academy of the Arts, 2005.
  • Marks III, Frederick W. Velvet on Iron: The Diplomacy of Theodore Roosevelt (1979
  • Mellander, Gustavo A.(1971) The United States in Panamanian Politics: The Intriguing Formative Years. Daville,Ill.:Interstate Publishers. OCLC 138568.
  • Mellander, Gustavo A.; Nelly Maldonado Mellander (1999). Charles Edward Magoon: The Panama Years. Río Piedras, Puerto Rico: Editorial Plaza Mayor. ISBN 1563281554. OCLC 42970390.
  • Nancy Mitchell. The Danger of Dreams: German and American Imperialism in Latin America (1999),
  • Mitchener, Kris James and Weidenmier, Marc. "Empire, Public Goods, and the Roosevelt Corollary." Journal of Economic History, 2005 65(3): 658-692. Issn: 0022-0507 Fulltext: in Swetswise
  • Ricard, Serge. "The Roosevelt Corollary." Presidential Studies 2006 36(1): 17-26. ISSN: 0360-4918 Fulltext: in Swetswise and Ingenta

 
 

 

Copyrights:

US Military Dictionary. The Oxford Essential Dictionary of the U.S. Military. Copyright © 2001, 2002 by Oxford University Press, Inc. All rights reserved.  Read more
US History Encyclopedia. © 2006 through a partnership of Answers Corporation. All rights reserved.  Read more
Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Roosevelt Corollary" Read more