Rote learning

This article does not cite any references or sources. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (October 2008)

Rote learning is a learning technique which avoids understanding of a subject and instead focuses on memorization. The major practice involved in rote learning is learning by repetition. The idea is that one will be able to quickly recall the meaning of the material the more one repeats it.

Rote methods are routinely used when quick memorization is required, such as learning one's lines in a play or memorizing a telephone number. Rote learning is widely used in the mastery of foundational knowledge. Examples of school topics where rote learning is frequently used include phonics in reading, the periodic table in chemistry, multiplication tables in mathematics, anatomy in medicine, cases or statutes in law, basic formulas in any science, etc. Rote learning, by definition, eschews comprehension, however, and consequently, it is an ineffective tool in mastering any complex subject at an advanced level. Rote learning is frequently used to prepare quickly for exams. If exam papers are not well designed, it is possible for someone with good memorization techniques to pass the test without any meaningful comprehension of the subject.

Rote learning vs. actual thinking

Rote learning is sometimes disparaged with the derogative terms parrot fashion, regurgitation, cramming, or mugging because one who engages in rote learning may give the wrong impression of having understood what they have written or said. It is strongly discouraged by many new curriculum standards. For example, science and mathematics standards in the United States specifically emphasize the importance of deep understanding over the mere recall of facts, which is seen to be less important, although advocates of traditional education have criticized the new American standards as slighting learning basic facts and elementary arithmetic, and replacing content with process-based skills.

"When calculators can do multidigit long division in a microsecond, graph complicated functions at the push of a button, and instantaneously calculate derivatives and integrals, serious questions arise about what is important in the mathematics curriculum and what it means to learn mathematics. More than ever, mathematics must include the mastery of concepts instead of mere memorization and the following of procedures. More than ever, school mathematics must include an understanding of how to use technology to arrive meaningfully at solutions to problems instead of endless attention to increasingly outdated computational tedium."

-National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Commonsense Facts to Clear the Air^[1]

In math and science, rote methods are often used to memorize formulas. Deeper understanding results if students focus on understanding the formula rather than memorizing it and if they commit it to memory through exercises that use the formula rather than rote repetition. Newer standards often recommend that students derive formulas themselves to achieve the best understanding. However, nothing is faster than rote learning if a formula must be learned quickly for an imminent test and rote methods can be helpful for committing an understood fact to memory.

Eugène Ionesco commented upon rote learning in his play "The Lesson":^[2]

Pupil

In india many good students(with proper reasoning) die as they are criticised for not being good rote learners.

Professor

[...] unless you can comprehend the primary elements, how do you expect to be able to calculate mentally [...] how much, for example, are three billion seven hundred fifty-five million nine hundred ninety-eight thousand two hundred fifty one, multiplied by five billion one hundred sixty-two million three hundred and three thousand five hundred and eight?

Pupil [very quickly]

That makes nineteen quintillion three hundred eighty-nine quadrillion six hundred and two trillion nine hundred forty-seven billion one hundred seventy-nine million one hundred sixty-four thousand five hundred and eight ...

[...]

Professor [Stupefied]

But how did you know that, if you don't know the principles of arithmetical reasoning?

Pupil

It's easy. Not being able to rely on my reasoning, I've memorized all the products of all possible multiplications.

Rote learning as a necessity

With some material rote learning is the only way to learn it in a short time; for example, when learning the Greek alphabet or lists of vocabulary words.^{[citation needed]} Similarly, when learning the conjugation of foreign irregular verbs, the morphology is often too subtle to be learned explicitly in a short time. However, as in the alphabet example, learning where the alphabet came from may help one to grasp the concept of it and therefore memorize it. (Native speakers and speakers with a lot of experience usually get an intuitive grasp of those subtle rules and are able to conjugate even irregular verbs that they have never heard before.)

The source transmission could be auditory or visual, and is usually in the form of short bits such as rhyming phrases (but rhyming is not a prerequisite), rather than chunks of text large enough to make lengthy paragraphs. Brevity is not always the case with rote learning. For example, many Americans can recite their National Anthem, or even the much more lengthy Preamble to the United States Constitution. Their ability to do so can be attributed, at least in some part, to having been assimilated by rote learning. The repeated stimulus of hearing it recited in public, on TV, at a sporting event, etc. has caused the mere sound of the phrasing of the words and inflections to be "written", as if hammer-to-stone, into the long-term memory. Excessive repetition within a limited time frame can actually be counter-productive to learning, through an effect termed semantic satiation.

By nation and culture

This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding reliable references. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (December 2008)

The system is widely practiced in schools across India, Pakistan, China, Malaysia, Singapore (which is often criticized for its inflexible education system)^[who?], Japan, Romania,, Italy, Turkey,^[3] Malta and Greece.^{[citation needed]} Some of these nations are admired for their high test scores in international comparisons while some of these nations regularly rank near the bottom on international tests.^[4] Xiaping Li (2006) has studied the effects of rote learning in second language learning in Taiwan.^[5] He notes Chinese learners hold high the tradition of rote learning as being an integral part of their culture.

In Singapore, with the introduction of the integrated programme, the government is making attempts to move away from rote learning, at least for the more able students.^{[citation needed]}

In the United States

New curriculum standards from the NCTM and National Science Education Standards call for more emphasis on active learning, critical thinking and communication over recall of facts. In many fields such as mathematics and science it is still a matter of controversy as to whether rote memorization of facts such as the multiplication table or boiling point of water are still necessary. Progressive reforms, such as outcomes-based education, which have put an emphasis on eliminating rote learning in favor of deep understanding have produced controversy among those favoring traditional rote methods. Some American texts such as TERC omit rote memorization in favor of conceptual learning.

Development

In the United Nations Arab human development report for 2004 the Arab researchers claim that rote learning is a major contributing factor to the lack of progress in science and research & development in the Arab countries. Asian nations, though scoring well on skill tests, are also studying standards of nations such as the United States to increase innovation and creativity. Studies of math skill advantages of Asian students show them to excel in basic skills, but not in complex problem solving not easily solved with standard methods.^{[citation needed]}

Religion

Children learning the Koran in Mauritania.

Many religions contain vast amount of scriptures, commentaries and even commentaries on classical commentaries. Rote learning is prevalent in many religious schools throughout the world. This is partly due to the fact that most major religions appeared before the emergence of print.

Most Dharmic religions such as Hinduism or Buddhism initially transmitted their scriptural knowledge through oral transmission without resort to text. This was done by converting verse into chant and repeating it to commit to memory. In Abrahamic religions, Jewish yeshivot or chederim (plural of cheder) use rote learning when teaching children Torah, Muslim madrasas utilize it in memorizing Koran. A person who has memorized the entire Koran is known as Hafiz. In pre-Enlightenment Europe, memorization techniques were known as Method of loci, mainly practiced in monastery and university, where divinity were taught. These skills were highly praised and they were known to be extensive allay of memorization technique such as the memory palace.

After the emergence of printing press, the memorization of the entire scriptures was no longer an essential requirement of being a religious teacher. Rote learning is still used in various degrees, especially by young children, the main purpose being to memorize and retain as much textual material as possible, to prepare a student for a more analytical learning in the future.

Music

^{[citation needed]}

This term can also refer to learning music by ear, a practice used with those who cannot (yet) read musical notation. However, many music teachers make a clear distinction between the two approaches. Specialised forms of rote learning have also been used in Vedic chanting to preserve the intonation and lexical accuracy of texts by oral tradition. The Suzuki Method's underlying key is rote learning.^{[citation needed]}

The Suzuki Method and rote learning

As outlined in Edward Kreitman's book "Teaching From The Balance Point", there is a clear difference between rote learning and learning by ear, which is in fact the more important skill developed by the Suzuki method. In chapter two, "Rote Versus Note", this difference is explained:^[6]

...I believe that we need to examine three different approaches to learning. Learning by rote: Using a specific set of instructions to produce the desired result Learning by reading: Using symbolism on the printed page to learn the sequence of notes Learning by ear: Using the "mind's ear", together with a few simple skills and a basic understanding of the logic of the instrument, to figure out any piece

An illustration of these three approaches, and how they relate to learning music, follows. The author shows that rote learning is not in fact the principal means upon which the Suzuki method relies.

Learning Methods for School

The flashcard, outline, and mnemonic device are traditional tools for memorizing course material. The flashcard article presents a method called “efficient recitation with overlearning” or ERO (Himes, unpublished) that combines these tools.^[7] The section refers to study skill manuals whose authors made use of research^[8][9] and the use of recitation in schools before the mid-20th century.^[10][11]

See also

• Learnitlists.com
• Recall of facts

References

Further reading

• Teaching From the Balance Point by Edward Kreitman

Internet reading link: http://www.audiblox2000.com/learning_disabilities/rote-learning.htm