1. The first king of Israel, son of Kish of the tribe of Benjamin. Handsome and tall (I Sam 9:2), he proved a charismatic leader (I Sam 11:7). The account of his election as king is presented in parallel narratives, which differ in their viewpoints, being either favorable or hostile to the monarchy. The background to his election was the military successes of the Philistines and the growth of unrest among the tribes of Benjamin and Ephraim. The pro-monarchic account of his election narrates how Samuel found Saul searching for his father’s lost asses and anointed him privately in Ramah (I Sam 9:1-10:16). Interwoven with this narrative, and possibly a separate account, is the story of his victory over the Ammonites who had attacked the city of Jabesh Gilead (I Sam chap. 11). An anti-monarchic version of his selection (I Sam chap. 8; 10:17-27; chap. 12) tells of Samuel’s opposition to the demand of the people for a king. However, he eventually relented and presided over Saul’s formal election at Mizpah. Samuel’s main argument against appointing a king (I Sam 8:6-8) was based on his interpretation of the people’s demand as a rejection of the kingship of God. His solemn warning of the consequences of the behavior of the king (I Sam 8:11-18), became a famous denunciation of the institution of the monarchy.Due to the varying accounts, it is difficult to reconstruct the sequence of events during Saul’s reign. It seems that after a brief period of organization, Saul directed his attention towards the Philistines, who had overrun the southern tribes of Israel, destroyed Shiloh, and were so thoroughly the masters of Judah and the central hill country that they maintained an outpost in Benjamin (I Sam 13:3). Saul’s son, Jonathan, slew the Philistine governor at Geba (I Sam chap. 13), and thus the signal was given for the uprising. The Philistines took up a position opposite Gibeah in the gorge of Michmash, and Jonathan, without the knowledge of his father scaled the cliff and slew 20 men of the Philistine outpost. The philistine armies were routed and driven back to Philistia (I Sam chaps. 13-14). Thus their control of the mountain area was broken, although they continued to threaten Israel throughout Saul’s reign.The expulsion of the Philistines marked the beginning of Saul’s kingship. In his attempts to assert his authority over the Israelite population of the central mountain area and unite the tribes under his rule, he uprooted the foreign enclaves in his tribe’s territory. In this context, he killed an unknown number of Gibeonites in violation of the treaty made in Joshua’s day (Josh chap. 9). After Saul’s death, to rectify this, the Gibeonites demanded the lives of seven of Saul’s sons; David handed over five of Saul’s grandsons and two sons who were hanged at Gibeon (II Sam 21:1-9). The Ammonites, Moabites, Edomites and Arameans were driven off from the country east of the Jordan (I Sam 14:47). In order to deliver Judah from the raids of the Amalekites, Saul undertook an expedition against them; his army captured Agag, their king, and Samuel personally slew him, rebuking Saul for initially sparing his life (I Sam chap. 15). The breach between Saul and Samuel, a result of Saul’s apparent usurpation of authority during the war against Amalek, was to cast a gloom on the remainder of the monarch’s reign. An evil spirit seemed to posses the king; he was given to fits of terror and suspicious brooding; a profound melancholy crept over him, and only the sound of music gave him temporary relief. Perhaps it is in this context that David, a skilled musician, joined Saul’s entourage; the narrative contrasts David’s heroic personality, charm and popularity with the increasing nervous depression of Saul (I Sam 16:14-23).Apparently after David’s victory over Goliath (I Sam chap. 17), Saul grew increasingly jealous of David’s popularity, even casting a spear at him (I Sam 18:10-11; 19:9-10). Later, in a fit of anger, Saul threw his spear at his own son Jonathan, who had become David’s close friend and admirer (I Sam 20:33). David was forced to flee from Saul’s wrath to the border regions of Judah and later as far as Gath in Philistia. Saul’s rage against David extended beyond pursuing him and his followers, to attacking the priesthood which he felt had been siding with David (I Sam 22:17-19). This widened the gulf which had come to separate him from many of his people.The end of his reign came when he engaged in one last forlorn struggle with his earliest enemy. The Philistines had invaded Israelite territory and gathered forces at Shunem; Saul established his headquarters on the slope of . Sad forebodings of his fate troubling him, he traveled to En Dor to consult a witch about the outcome of the battle (I Sam 28:7-8), since he could no longer use the official means of divination (I Sam 28:6). The result of the séance confirmed his worst fears and filled his soul with despair (I Sam 28:20ff). The Israelite army had no chariots and could not withstand the assault of the heavy Philistine weaponry. On , Saul and his three sons, including Jonathan, were killed. The biblical narrative describes how Saul, being seriously wounded, called upon his armor-bearer to “thrust me through”, and when the young man refused, the king fell upon his sword and died (I Sam 31:4). (In a contrasting account, in II Samuel 1:6-10, a young Amalekite claimed that he had slain Saul). The Philistines next day found their enemy dead, and hung his decapitated body on the walls of their city Beth Shan (I Sam 31:8-10). The inhabitants of Jabesh, remembering how Saul had responded to their cry for help, removed his body during the night, and gave it an honorable burial in their own city, the site of his first victory. According to I Samuel 31:12 they burned the bodies of Saul and Jonathan to spare them from further Philistine indignities (but see I Chr 10:12).The outcome of the battle meant a state of vassalage for Israel; the Philistines regained control of much of the country and kept it until well into David’s reign. Saul left behind him a tribal alliance weakened and in disarray, and it was David who was to establish the national unity of the Israelite tribes.Recent research suggests that the biblical narrative was heavily tilted in favor of the Davidic version of events and that Saul’s wrath and rage may have been fictious and that the picture of Benjaminite history has been distorted.
2. Saul of Rehoboth-by-the River was the sixth king of Edom. His reign succeeded that of Samlah of Masrekah and was followed by that of Baal-Hanan the son of Aohbor “before any king reigned over the Children of Israel” (I Chr 1:43). 3. Saul of Tarsus“who also is called Paul” (Acts 13:9). See PAUL.
Concordance
SAUL 1:
I Sam 9:2-3, 5,7-8, 10, 15,17-19, 21-22,24-27; 10:11-12, 14-16, 21,26; 11:4-7, 11-13, 15; 13:1-4,7, 9-11, 13,15-16, 22; 14:1-2, 16-21,24, 33-38, 40-47, 49-52; 15:1, 4-7, 9,11-13, 15-16,20, 24, 26-27,31, 34-35; 16:1-2, 14-15,17, 19-23; 17:2, 8, 11-15,19, 31-34, 37-39, 55, 57-58; 18:1-2, 5-13,15, 17-25, 27-30; 19:1-2, 4,6-7, 9-11, 14-15, 17-21, 24; 20:25-28, 30,32-33; 21:7,10-11; 22:6-7,9, 12-13, 21-22; 23:7-17,19, 21, 24-28; 24:1-5, 7-9,16, 22; 25:44; 26:1-7, 12, 17,21, 25; 27:1,4; 28:3-10, 12-15, 20-21, 25; 29:3, 5; 31:2-8, 11-12. II Sam 1:1-2,4-6, 12, 17,21-24; 2:4-5,7-8, 10, 12,15; 3:1, 6-8,10, 13-14; 4:1-2, 4, 8, 10; 5:2; 6:16, 20,23; 7:15; 9:1-3, 6-7, 9; 12:7; 16:5, 8; 19:17,24; 21:1-2, 4,6-8, 11-14; 22:1. I Chr 5:10; 8:33; 9:39; 10:2-8,11-13; 11:2; 12:1-2, 19, 23,29; 13:3; 15:29; 26:28. Is 10:29. Acts 13:21
SAUL 2:
Gen 36:37-38. I Chr 1:48-49
SAUL 3:
Acts 7:58; 8:1,3; 9:1, 4, 8,11, 17, 19, 22,24, 26; 11:25,30; 12:25; 13:1-2, 7, 9; 22:7, 13; 26:14