Seven Years War
Seven Years War (1756-63). This was in reality two separate conflicts, the first fought in Germany and central Europe between Prussia and a coalition headed by Austria, France, and Russia, and the second overseas between Britain and France, latterly assisted by Spain. The two struggles were linked principally by France's involvement in both, though as the war continued this link became increasingly fragile. Both conflicts were to prove decisive, albeit in different ways: that in Europe established Prussia and Russia as great powers, while in the maritime and colonial sphere Britain overwhelmingly defeated the two leading Bourbon monarchies and secured a dominant position by 1763. The principal loser in both struggles was France, whose standing as the leading continental power was destroyed for a generation and would only be restored by the armies of the French Revolution during the 1790s.
The European conflict had a clear-cut beginning which the colonial war lacked. On 29 August 1756 Frederick ‘the Great’ led his troops across the border into neighbouring Saxony. He was convinced that he would be attacked in the following spring by a coalition assembled by the Austrian Chancellor Wenzel Anton von Kaunitz, which aimed to recover the former Habsburg province of Silesia, seized by Prussia during the War of the Austrian Succession. This powerful alliance now contained not only Austria but France and Russia, and would subsequently be extended to include the declining second-rank state of Sweden and contingents of soldiers provided by the Holy Roman Empire. In the period before the Seven Years War Frederick's foreign policy was pacific; he believed that any further conflict could only imperil his possession of the rich and well-populated territory of Silesia. But he recognized the military threat posed by Saxony, which could serve as a bridgehead for an invasion of Brandenburg, the core of the Hohenzollern monarchy. The river Elbe bisected both territories and would be used to move supplies, while his capital Berlin was only some 50 miles (80 km) from the exposed frontier with the Saxon electorate. Though ostensibly neutral, the electorate was firmly in the political orbit of Austria and France and a Saxon princess was married to the heir to the French throne. Believing he would inevitably be attacked by Austria and Russia in the spring of 1757, Frederick took the initiative and invaded Saxony at the very end of August 1756.
The Seven Years War, 1756-63, and related actions worldwide. This 'world war' overlapped with continuing British-French colonial conflicts in America (top) and India (right), but at its centre was the Prussia of Frederick the Great and its fight for survival (bottom).
(Click to enlarge)
Click to enlarge
His action was, at first sight, successful. The Saxon army was speedily surrounded and disarmed. Its officers were permitted to go into exile with the ruler and his court, which moved to Warsaw (the Elector Augustus was also king of Poland), and the rank and file was incorporated into Prussian regiments, though most of these unwilling recruits subsequently deserted. An attempted Habsburg counter-attack was repulsed, confirming Frederick in his disdainful view of Austrian military power. The political repercussions of his invasion were more serious. It ensured that France would fight actively to defeat Prussia, and enabled Kaunitz to transform his defensive alliance into an offensive coalition, which confronted Frederick in the campaign of 1757.
Encouraged by his early success and anxious for a short war (because of Prussia's very limited resources, particularly when measured against the overwhelming advantage which his enemies seemed to enjoy), Frederick went on the offensive in this first campaign. He invaded Bohemia, winning a hard-fought victory at Prague (6 May) but suffering a severe reverse at Kolin (18 June), in a battle which forced him to acknowledge the progress which the Austrian army had made since the defeats of the 1730s and 1740s. Simultaneously the Russians advanced upon isolated East Prussia, the source of the Hohenzollern royal title but cut off from the dynasty's heartlands by several hundred miles of Polish territory. Two months after the reverse at Kolin, Russia's troops inflicted a serious defeat on the Prussians at Gross Jägersdorf (30 August). Prussia's first crisis of the Seven Years War in autumn 1757 was overcome by Frederick's comprehensive victory at Rossbach over a Franco-imperial force twice his own strength and, a month later, by an even more impressive success over the Austrians at Leuthen.
Rossbach was the war's most decisive battle, because of its enormous repercussions within France. Louis XV's monarchy was Europe's leading military power and had not expected such a shattering reverse, particularly at the hands of an upstart such as Prussia. It was also involved in a worldwide struggle with the rising British empire, its colonial and commercial competitor throughout the 18th century. The outbreak of the colonial war was far less clear-cut than the European. Britain and France were neighbours as well as rivals in North America, and the peace settlement which had ended the previous conflict, that over the Austrian succession, at Aix-la-Chapelle (1748), had been only a truce. The two colonial powers competed for territory and influence, especially in the Ohio river valley, and the French and Indian war had been underway throughout the 1750s. Britain's actions in sending a force under Gen Braddock in December 1754 to punish the French for an earlier attack and her seizure of French ships on the high seas in 1755, signalled a sharp deterioration in relations, though these initiatives were viewed in London as responses to earlier provocations. After the French destroyed Braddock on the Monongahela the two states were openly at war, even if it was not formally declared until May 1756.
The Anglo-French war in Europe began with important French victories, especially the capture of Britain's Mediterranean base of Minorca in June 1756, her defeat in Germany at Hastenbeck (26 July 1757), and the capitulation by Cumberland at Klosterseven (10 September). This proved a false dawn for France. The rout at Rossbach in November destroyed French military power for a generation and undermined the confidence of her generals and statesmen. Throughout the 18th century France's strategic Achilles' heel had been that even the great resources available to her were insufficient to support two simultaneous wars: that with the Habsburgs on the continent and with Britain overseas. The rivalry with Austria had apparently been ended by the first Treaty of Versailles signed in May 1756, one purpose of which had been to enable French resources to be concentrated on the overseas struggle, now widely seen in France as the greater priority. Frederick's invasion of Saxony had frustrated this intention, and Rossbach demonstrated the disastrous consequences of attempting to fight two wars. Thereafter France's commitment to the continental struggle was scaled down, being formally reduced by the third Treaty of Versailles (March 1759), after which French troops fought only in Westphalia, where they engaged in indecisive operations against the so-called Army of Observation. This treaty was concluded by the Duc de Choiseul, who had become foreign minister in December 1758 and who was determined to concentrate available resources on the colonial struggle with Britain.
France's changed priorities proved decisive in the continental war. Prussia's desperate struggle was reduced in scale, becoming primarily a war against Austria and, increasingly, Russia. Sweden, though a member of the anti-Prussian coalition, contributed little to the struggle and her military effort was viewed disdainfully by Frederick. Meanwhile Britain, where William Pitt ‘the Elder’ had secured real authority in 1757 after the early defeats, moved to support Prussia effectively. From 1758-61 London provided an annual subsidy of £670, 000, which contributed almost one-fifth of the total costs of Prussia's war effort, and more practical help in the shape of the so-called ‘Army of Observation’ which protected Prussia's vulnerable western flank for the remainder of the war and which was financed and in part manned by Britain. The stalemate on the Westphalian front, together with the ineffective Swedish military effort, significantly reduced the threat of encirclement which Frederick had faced in 1756-8.
The war now became a less unequal struggle than it had been initially. Frederick's exposed geographical position did not become a strategic liability. The provinces of the Hohenzollern monarchy sprawled across northern Europe, from the Rhineland in the west to the Niemen far to the east. Territorial dispersal had long been a problem facing rulers in Berlin. During the Seven Years War the king abandoned the outlying possessions: those in Westphalia were under French occupation from the first campaign of the struggle, while East Prussia was occupied by the Russians from January 1758 onwards. Instead he concentrated upon his compact central position, adopting a strategy of interior lines and fighting the war in Brandenburg, Saxony, Silesia, and Bohemia. The Prussian offensive in 1757 had, for a time, seemed likely to end in disaster. Thereafter Frederick adopted a strategy of attrition, striking first against one opponent and then against another, with the aim of preventing his enemies, with their massively superior resources, from uniting and delivering the decisive blow which he feared. This was successful, though along the way he lost as many battles as he won: his towering military reputation after the war reflected more his survival, in the face of overwhelming odds, than his battlefield successes.
This survival owed much to non-military factors. The Prussian home front proved stronger than that of its enemies. Despite its officials being unpaid for extended periods during the war, Prussia's famed administration was able to scrape together the men, money, and matériel needed to sustain the struggle. Though the quality of recruits declined during the second half of the war, the canton system of territorial recruitment proved more able to provide soldiers than its Austrian counterpart. The brutal and haphazard conscription of the Russian empire provided more soldiers than were available to Frederick, and the continental war became a life-and-death struggle between Prussia and her powerful rival in north-eastern Europe.
In its middle years no clear decision was evident in the war for Silesia. Despite a series of reverses, particularly at the hands of the Russians—a bloody tactical draw at Zorndorf on 25 August 1758, serious defeats at Kay (Paltzig) on 23 July 1759 and especially at Kundersdorf on 12 August of that year—Frederick retained the ability to win sufficient victories to keep the struggle going. Though he had lost Hochkirch to the Austrians (14 October 1758), decisive victories at Liegnitz (15 August 1760) and Torgau (3 November) broke Habsburg will to sustain the conflict. In 1761 Austria was forced to reduce the size of her army, though the fighting continued, and embark upon the further administrative changes which were essential. Vienna had contributed to its own failure. Though Austrian troops had fought bravely, earning Frederick's respect, Habsburg generalship was at best mediocre and frequently did not rise to that level. The French alliance had not produced the expected contribution, in men and money, to the war effort, while Russia was too much of a political rival in eastern Europe ever to be a comfortable partner: the military co-operation of the two powers, upon which so much rested particularly during the second half of the war, was beset by mutual suspicion and distrust.
The indecisive, though bloody, struggle in central Europe was in sharp contrast to the clear-cut outcome overseas. France's concentration on the war against Britain from 1759 onwards did not bring success: on the contrary defeats soon began to mount up in this theatre as the British war effort, now directed by William Pitt, gained purpose and momentum. Britain was far superior at sea, and this was underlined by decisive victories in European waters during 1759 at Lagos (July) and in Quiberon Bay (November). Maritime supremacy was the basis of a series of British successes which destroyed 18th-century French imperial power for ever. The losses in the French and Indian war were particularly striking. There Britain's objective in 1758-60 was the conquest of the French colony of Canada, and this was achieved in stages. The vital base of Louisbourg on Cape Breton island in the Gulf of St Lawrence was captured in July 1758, and Fort Duquesne (renamed Fort Pitt, now Pittsburgh) in December. In the following year Quebec was taken, after the dramatic scaling of the Heights of Abraham by Wolfe. The British conquest of Canada was completed by the seizure of Montreal in September 1760. In the Indian subcontinent France's position was undermined by a series of British successes. Victory by Clive in the small-scale but decisive battle of Plassey gave Britain, or rather her East India Company, control of Bengal, while subsequent successes at Wandiwash (January 1760) and Pondicherry (January 1761) weakened the French position on the Carnatic coast in the south-east. Other colonial trophies were seized from the near-prostrate French monarchy, above all the West Indian Islands of Guadeloupe (May 1759) and Martinique (February 1762).
As Britain's gains mounted up in the annus mirabilis of 1759, Horace Walpole famously remarked that so numerous were the successes the church bells were worn out ringing for victories. Whether these gains were the result of a clear-cut strategy, so much as superior naval power and war finance, better generals and admirals, and experience of previous successful struggles with France, must be doubted. Pitt was an energetic and, more important, a lucky war leader, rather than a strategist of genius. His reputation, at the time and since, owes much to the skilful way he was careful to exploit the successes and ring the bells of victory: his greatness rested on his undoubted abilities as a propagandist.
By 1760 Britain had comprehensively won the Anglo-French Seven Years War. The scale of that victory was reduced by a series of events during the next two years. George III's accession in October 1760, and the coming to power of his minister-favourite, the Earl of Bute, in the following year seriously reduced British willingness to pay for a ‘German war’ which appeared to be deadlocked and, more important, did not appear to be contributing to Britain's struggle with France. Anglo-French peace negotiations in 1761 failed to produce a settlement. Choiseul, from that year Louis XV's leading minister, now broadened the war by signing the so-called Bourbon Family Compact with Spain. During the reign of Ferdinand VI (1746-59) Madrid had remained neutral, but the accession of the anti-British Charles III (1759-88) opened the way for a Franco-Spanish alliance, concluded in August 1761. Pitt favoured an immediate attack upon Spain and its vulnerable empire and, when his cabinet colleagues refused support, resigned (October 1761). Spain entered the Anglo-French war in January 1762, but this only enabled the victorious British forces to win a further series of victories, especially the capture of Havana and of Manila later in that year.
The continental war was effectively decided by the death of Frederick's implacable foe, the Russian Empress Elizabeth, in January 1762. Her successor was the pro-Prussian Peter III, who immediately concluded first an armistice and then a peace treaty with his Prussian hero. Austria continued to fight for one further campaign, in the course of which Frederick won a final tactical victory at Burkersdorf (July 1762). Though preparations for the next campaign went ahead, neither state had either the will or the human and material resources to continue fighting. Peace negotiations between Austria and Prussia began on 30 December 1762, and were quickly concluded. By the peace of Hubertusburg (15 February 1763), signed at the Saxon elector's hunting lodge, the continental war was ended on the basis of the territorial status quo. Seven years of intensive and at times desperate fighting had produced a settlement which merely restored the position which had prevailed before the war began. Frederick famously compared his own predicament during the conflict to that of a trapeze artist who was always one step from disaster. By 1763 he had safely reached the end of the high wire, an outcome which had been in doubt for much of the struggle.
The Anglo-Bourbon peace settlement took far longer to conclude, though it was signed in the same month. During complex and prolonged negotiations in 1762-3 Choiseul's skilful diplomacy, together with Britain's war-weariness, limited Bourbon losses: the final settlement was more generous to France and Spain than the prevailing military situation might have required. Yet the terms of the Peace of Paris (10 February 1763) were still a serious defeat for the Bourbon allies. France was excluded from the North American mainland, retaining only a precarious foothold in the Newfoundland fisheries through the possession of the islands of St Pierre and Miquelon, while her position in the Indian subcontinent was effectively destroyed. Her ally Spain handed over Florida to Britain, subsequently receiving Louisiana from France in compensation. The Seven Years War had thus established Britain's maritime and colonial dominance over her Bourbon rivals, and after 1763 she was clearly Europe's leading commercial and imperial power. Within Europe, by contrast, no such clear-cut result was apparent. Yet the political consequences of the continental fighting were in some ways even more momentous. The survival of Prussia and the military victories won by Russia established these two states as continental great powers. France by contrast had been defeated in both struggles, while the war's enormous cost was a major source of the massive financial problems of the Bourbon monarchy during the next generation which made a major contribution to the outbreak of the French Revolution of 1789.
Bibliography
- Dorn, W. L., Competition for Empire, 1740-1763 (New York, 1940).
- Duffy, Christopher, Frederick the Great: A Military Life (London, 1985).
- Middleton, Richard, The Bells of Victory: The Pitt-Newcastle Ministry and the Conduct of the Seven Years' War, 1757-1762 (Cambridge, 1985).
- Peters, Marie, The Elder Pitt (London, 1998).
- Showalter, Dennis E., The Wars of Frederick the Great (London, 1996)
— Hamish Scott
