(statistics) The degree to which a distribution departs from symmetry about its mean value.
On this page
(statistics) The degree to which a distribution departs from symmetry about its mean value.
|
Featured Videos:
|
Investopedia Financial Dictionary:
Skewness |
Describe asymmetry from the normal distribution in a set of statistical data. Skewness can come in the form of "negative skewness" or "positive skewness", depending on whether data points are skewed to the left (negative skew) or to the right (positive skew) of the data average.
Investopedia Says:
Skewness is extremely important to finance and investing. Most sets of data, including stock prices and asset returns, have either positive or negative skew rather than following the balanced normal distribution (which has a skewness of zero). By knowing which way data is skewed, one can better estimate whether a given (or future) data point will be more or less than the mean.
Most advanced economic analysis models study data for skewness and incorporate this into their calculations. Skewness risk is the risk that a model assumes a normal distribution of data when in fact data is skewed to the left or right of the mean.
Related Links:
This technique can reduce uncertainty in estimating future outcomes. Bet Smarter With The Monte Carlo Simulation
Learn to predict future events through a series of random trials. Monte Carlo Simulation With GBM
When it comes to hedge funds, this measure is not reliable on its own. How The Sharpe Ratio Can Oversimplify Risk
CAPM helps you determine what return you deserve for putting your money at risk. The Capital Asset Pricing Model: An Overview
Similar metrics as those used for mutual funds apply, but hedge fund analysis requires additional depth. Quantitative Analysis Of Hedge Funds
Their inverse correlation with stocks and bonds make these alternative investments worth getting to know. A Primer On Managed Futures
These statistical measurements highlight how to mitigate risk and increase rewards. 5 Ways To Measure Mutual Fund Risk
Volatility is not the only way to measure risk. Learn about the "new science of risk management". An Introduction To Value at Risk (VAR)
Wikipedia on Answers.com:
Skewness |
In probability theory and statistics, skewness is a measure of the asymmetry of the probability distribution of a real-valued random variable. The skewness value can be positive or negative, or even undefined. Qualitatively, a negative skew indicates that the tail on the left side of the probability density function is longer than the right side and the bulk of the values (possibly including the median) lie to the right of the mean. A positive skew indicates that the tail on the right side is longer than the left side and the bulk of the values lie to the left of the mean. A zero value indicates that the values are relatively evenly distributed on both sides of the mean, typically but not necessarily implying a symmetric distribution.
|
Contents
|
Consider the distribution on the figure. The bars on the right side of the distribution taper differently than the bars on the left side. These tapering sides are called tails, and they provide a visual means for determining which of the two kinds of skewness a distribution has:
If the distribution is symmetric then the mean = median and there is zero skewness. (If, in addition, the distribution is unimodal, then the mean = median = mode.) This is the case of a coin toss or the series 1,2,3,4,... Note, however, that the converse is not true in general, i.e. zero skewness does not imply that the mean = median.
"Many textbooks," a 2005 article points out, "teach a rule of thumb stating that the mean is right of the median under right skew, and left of the median under left skew. [But] this rule fails with surprising frequency. It can fail in multimodal distributions, or in distributions where one tail is long but the other is heavy. Most commonly, though, the rule fails in discrete distributions where the areas to the left and right of the median are not equal. Such distributions not only contradict the textbook relationship between mean, median, and skew, they also contradict the textbook interpretation of the median."[2]
The skewness of a random variable X is the third standardized moment, denoted γ1 and defined as
![\gamma_1 = \operatorname{E}\Big[\big(\tfrac{X-\mu}{\sigma}\big)^{\!3}\, \Big]
= \frac{\mu_3}{\sigma^3}
= \frac{\operatorname{E}\big[(X-\mu)^3\big]}{\ \ \ ( \operatorname{E}\big[ (X-\mu)^2 \big] )^{3/2}}
= \frac{\kappa_3}{\kappa_2^{3/2}}\ ,](http://wpcontent.answcdn.com/wikipedia/en/math/7/9/1/79179c774e40d51df669e610d783c703.png)
where μ3 is the third moment about the mean μ, σ is the standard deviation, and E is the expectation operator. The last equality expresses skewness in terms of the ratio of the third cumulant κ3 and the 1.5th power of the second cumulant κ2. This is analogous to the definition of kurtosis as the fourth cumulant normalized by the square of the second cumulant.
The skewness is also sometimes denoted Skew[X].
The formula expressing skewness in terms of the non-central moment E[X3] can be expressed by expanding the previous formula,
![\gamma_1
= \operatorname{E}\bigg[\Big(\frac{X-\mu}{\sigma}\Big)^{\!3} \,\bigg]
= \frac{\operatorname{E}[X^3] - 3\mu\operatorname E[X^2] + 3\mu^2\operatorname E[X] - \mu^3}{\sigma^3}
= \frac{\operatorname{E}[X^3] - 3\mu\operatorname E[X^2] + 2\mu^3}{\sigma^3}\ .](http://wpcontent.answcdn.com/wikipedia/en/math/5/8/5/5859f0975af6ed8ff3f9b9e7fbec382f.png)
For a sample of n values the sample skewness is

where
is the sample mean, m3 is the sample third central moment, and m2 is the sample variance.
Given samples from a population, the equation for the sample skewness g1 above is a biased estimator of the population skewness. (Note that for a discrete distribution the sample skewness may be undefined (0/0), so its expected value will be undefined.) The usual estimator of population skewness is[citation needed]

where k3 is the unique symmetric unbiased estimator of the third cumulant and k2 is the symmetric unbiased estimator of the second cumulant. Unfortunately G1 is, nevertheless, generally biased (although it obviously has the correct expected value of zero for a symmetric distribution). Its expected value can even have the opposite sign from the true skewness. For instance a mixed distribution consisting of very thin Gaussians centred at −99, 0.5, and 2 with weights 0.01, 0.66, and 0.33 has a skewness of about −9.77, but in a sample of 3, G1 has an expected value of about 0.32, since usually all three samples are in the positive-valued part of the distribution, which is skewed the other way.
The variance of the skewness of a sample of size n from a normal distribution is[3]
6n ( n - 1 ) / [ ( n - 2 )( n + 1 )( n + 3 ) ]
An approximate alternative is 6/n but this is inaccurate for small samples.
Skewness can be infinite, as when
![\Pr \left[ X > x \right]=x^{-3}\mbox{ for }x>1,\ \Pr[X<1]=0](http://wpcontent.answcdn.com/wikipedia/en/math/b/1/2/b1212299616f2d94b3477c0373d30a78.png)
or undefined, as when
In this latter example, the third cumulant is undefined. One can also have distributions such as
![\Pr \left[ X > x \right]=x^{-2}\mbox{ for }x>1,\ \Pr[X<1]=0](http://wpcontent.answcdn.com/wikipedia/en/math/1/0/e/10e3862a622f8176bd880488d7ed9f19.png)
where both the second and third cumulants are infinite, so the skewness is again undefined.
If Y is the sum of n independent and identically distributed random variables, all with the distribution of X, then the third cumulant of Y is n times that of X and the second cumulant of Y is n times that of X, so
. This shows that the skewness of the sum is smaller, as it approaches a Gaussian distribution in accordance with the central limit theorem.
Skewness has benefits in many areas. Many models assume normal distribution; i.e., data are symmetric about the mean. The normal distribution has a skewness of zero. But in reality, data points may not be perfectly symmetric. So, an understanding of the skewness of the dataset indicates whether deviations from the mean are going to be positive or negative.
D'Agostino's K-squared test is a goodness-of-fit normality test based on sample skewness and sample kurtosis.
Karl Pearson suggested simpler calculations as a measure of skewness:[4] the Pearson mode or first skewness coefficient,[5] defined by
as well as Pearson's median or second skewness coefficient,[6] defined by
Starting from a standard cumulant expansion around a Normal distribution, one can actually show that skewness = 6 (mean − median) / standard deviation ( 1 + kurtosis / 8) + O(skewness2).[citation needed] One should keep in mind that above given equalities often don't hold even approximately and these empirical formulas are abandoned nowadays. There is no guarantee that these will be the same sign as each other or as the ordinary definition of skewness.
A skewness function

can be defined,[7][8] where F is the cumulative distribution function. This leads to a corresponding overall measure of skewness defined as the supremum of this over the range 1/2≤u<1,[7] while another measure can be obtained by integrating the numerator and denominator of this expression.[9] Galton's measure of skewness is γ(u) evaluated at u=3/4,[10] while other names for this same quantity are "Bowley Skewness",[11] "Yule-Kendall index"[12] and "quartile skewness". The function γ(u) satifies -1≤γ(u)≤1, and is well-defined without requiring the existence of any moments of the distribution.[9]
Kelley's measure of skewness uses u = 0.1.[citation needed]
Use of L-moments in place of moments provides a measure of skewness known as the L-skewness.
|
|
This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (July 2010) |
A simple skewness coefficient derived from the sample mean and individual observations:
The skewness coefficient a approaches to normal distribution. If data set has at least 45 values then a is nearly normal. Distribution of a if data are taken from normal or uniform distribution is the same. Behavior of a in other distributions is currently unknown. Although this measure is very easy to understand, analytic approach is difficult.
A value of skewness equal to zero does not imply that the probability distribution is symmetric. Thus there is a need for another measure of asymmetry which has this property: such a measure was introduced in 2000.[14] It is called distance skewness and denoted by dSkew. If X is a random variable which takes values in the d-dimensional Euclidean space, X has finite expectation, X' is an independent identically distributed copy of X and
denotes the norm in the Euclidean space then a simple measure of asymmetry is
and dSkew (X):= 1 for X = 0 (with probability 1). Distance skewness is always between 0 and 1, equals 0 if and only if X is diagonally symmetric (X and -X has the same probability distribution) and equals 1 if and only if X is a nonzero constant with probability one.[15] Thus there is a simple consistent statistical test of diagonal symmetry based on the sample distance skewness:
Groeneveld & Meeden have suggested ( μ – m ) / E| X – m | as an alternative measure.[16]
Pearson introduced the first measure of skewness in 1895 and used the (Mean - Mode) / (Standard Deviation).
Bowley introduced two additional measures in 1901: (Mean - Median) / (Standard deviation) and (Third central moment) / (Standard deviation)3.
Yule in 1911 introduced another: (qu + ql - 2 * mean)/(qu - ql) where qu + ql are the upper and lower quartiles respectively.
Doodson in 1917 examined the differences of the (Mode - Median) and the (Median - Mean) and used the (Mean - Mode) / (Standard Deviation).
Haldane in 1942 also investigated these relationships but instead used the (Third central moment) / (Standard deviation)3.
| Wikiversity has learning materials about Skewness |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)
| negative skewness (mathematics) | |
| skewed; skewness | |
| beta coefficient (statistics) |
| How do you compute for skewness? | |
| How do you compute the coefficient of skewness of the 132144127152101 and 165 coefficient of skewness? | |
| What are the kinds of skewness? |
Copyrights:
![]() |
![]() | McGraw-Hill Science & Technology Dictionary. McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Scientific and Technical Terms. Copyright © 2003, 1994, 1989, 1984, 1978, 1976, 1974 by McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Read more |
![]() | Investopedia Financial Dictionary. Copyright ©2010, Investopedia.com - Owned and Operated by Investopedia US, A Division of ValueClick, Inc. All rights reserved. Read more | |
![]() |
![]() | Wikipedia on Answers.com. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article Skewness. Read more |