Something that serves as indisputable evidence or proof, especially of a crime. For example, There is no smoking gun in the Oval Office; the President had no role in tampering with the evidence. This expression alludes to the smoke coming from a recently discharged firearm, a normal occurrence until the invention of smokeless powder. [Mid-1900s]
Something that serves as indisputable evidence or proof, especially of a crime.
Investopedia Says:
Here is an example used in everyday language from CNN.com on Feb 6, 2002:
"Maybe there was no proof before, but there is now; a secret memo - personally handed to [U.S. Vice-President Dick] Cheney by Ken Lay [ex-Enron chairman and CEO], which helps explain why the White House is so skittish about Enron and why Cheney and [U.S. President George W.] Bush stubbornly refuse to release the records of those energy task force meetings. The memo was obtained by the San Francisco Chronicle and reported exclusively there last week. This is the Enron smoking gun."
Related Links:
From godfathers to perps, familiarize yourself with the "criminal elements" creeping around Wall Street. Handcuffs And Smoking Guns: The Criminal Elements Of Wall Street
Where there is money, there are swindlers. Protect yourself by learning how investors have been betrayed in the past. The Biggest Stock Scams Of All Time
Learn the legwork involved in finding out whether your investment can weather a storm. Playing The Sleuth In A Scandal Stock
Discover the most common problems retirees face, and what they can do to solve them. The Top 3 Retiree Worries (And What To Do About Them)
Spot a rotten investment before you get seduced by its sweet promise of profit. Are Structured Retail Products Too Good To Be True?

The term "smoking gun" was originally, and is still primarily, a reference to an object or fact that serves as conclusive evidence of a crime or similar act. In addition to this, its meaning has evolved in uses completely unrelated to criminal activity: for example, scientific evidence that is highly suggestive in favor of a particular hypothesis is sometimes called smoking gun evidence. Its name originally came from the idea of finding a smoking (i.e., very recently fired) gun on the person of a suspect wanted for shooting someone, which in that situation would be nearly unshakable proof of having committed the crime. A piece of evidence that falls just short of being conclusive is sometimes referred to as a "smoldering gun."
The phrase originated in the Sherlock Holmes story, The Gloria Scott (1893). The origin and development of "smoking gun" was described by William Safire[1] in his column, "On Language," as follows:
When did that phrase first become the favorite figure of speech meaning incontrovertible incrimination? The answer is elementary, Watson. In an 1893 Sherlock Holmes story, The Gloria Scott, Arthur Conan Doyle wrote of a grisly murder by a sham chaplain aboard a prison ship: We rushed into the captain's cabin . . . there he lay with his brains smeared over the chart of the Atlantic . . . while the chaplain stood with a smoking pistol in his hand at his elbow. A good copy editor would have fixed Doyle's awkward in his hand at his elbow, and Sir Arthur chose pistol rather than gun, but that Holmes citation seems to be the start of the cliché that grips us today.
It was made famous during the Golden Age of Political Coinage. The Watergate era coined or popularized Saturday night massacre, stonewalling, cover-up, dirty tricks, straight arrow, expletive deleted, third-rate burglary, plumbers, Deep Throat, Big Enchilada, enemies list and twisting slowly in the wind. That was when Doyle's smoking pistol, which had changed in occasional usage over 80 years to smoking gun, blazed its way into dictionaries.
It first appeared in The New York Times on July 14, 1974, in an article by Roger Wilkins: The big question asked over the last few weeks in and around the House Judiciary Committee's hearing room by committee members who were uncertain about how they felt about impeachment was 'Where's the smoking gun?' The question was rooted in a Nixon defense strategy, to narrow the grounds for impeachment to a provable crime. On July 31, Representative Jack Brooks of Texas told the impeachment panel that he thought Nixon was guilty of income-tax evasion: Millions of Americans will view this evidence as a so-called smoking gun. With insufficient proof, that charge did not stick.
On Aug. 5, the committee released a transcript of a recording of the meeting held two years earlier, on June 23, 1972, in which the White House chief of staff, H.R. Haldeman, asked President Nixon, You think the thing to do is to get them, the F.B.I., to stop? and Nixon replied, Right, fine. Representative Barber Conable of New York promptly said that looked like a smoking gun, and the recording became known as the smoking-gun tape.
| Look up smoking gun in Wiktionary, the free dictionary. |
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)