(mining engineering) Extracting samples at evenly spaced periods or in fixed quantities from a unit of coal.
| Sci-Tech Dictionary: systematic sampling |
(mining engineering) Extracting samples at evenly spaced periods or in fixed quantities from a unit of coal.
| 5min Related Video: Systematic sampling |
| Accounting Dictionary: Systematic Sampling |
Sampling approach used in auditing. In a population of n units and a desired sample of s units, the auditor selects every rth unit (n/s) systematically beginning at a random point among the first r units in the population. In the case where a population is not in numerical sequence, it is easier to choose a systematic random sample instead of a pure random sample. If documents or transactions are unnumbered, no need exists with this approach to number them physically, as would be the case with random number table selection. Instead, with systematic sampling the auditor counts off the sampling interval to choose the documents. Some audit software packages have routines for systematic selection purposes. A problem with this sampling approach is that every rth unit may correspond to an existing sequence in the population, so sample items are continually selected from the same part of a recurring pattern. Assume the auditor is examining 500 paid checks from a total population of 15,000 checks. One random starting point is used. The auditor will select every 30th check (15,000/500). So that 500 checks may be chosen, the auditor goes upward or downward from their random starting point. Assume a random starting point of check number 80. Therefore, check numbers 50 (80 - 30) and 20 (80 - 60) are includable in the sample, as well as every 30th check number subsequent to number 80 (i.e., 110, 140, etc.). If the auditor chose 10 random starting points, 50 checks (500/10) would be chosen from each random start. Hence, the auditor would pick every 300th check number (15,000/50) prior to and subsequent to each of the random starting points.
| Wikipedia: Systematic sampling |
Systematic sampling is a statistical method involving the selection of elements from an ordered sampling frame. The most common form of systematic sampling is an equal-probability method, in which every kth element in the frame is selected, where k, the sampling interval (sometimes known as the 'skip'), is calculated as:[1]
Using this procedure each element in the population has a known and equal probability of selection. This makes systematic sampling functionally similar to simple random sampling. It is however, much more efficient (if variance within systematic sample is more than variance of population).
The researcher must ensure that the chosen sampling interval does not hide a pattern. Any pattern would threaten randomness. A random starting point must also be selected.
Systematic sampling is to be applied only if the given population is logically homogeneous, because systematic sample units are uniformly distributed over the population.
Example: Suppose a supermarket wants to study buying habits of their customers, then using systematic sampling they can choose every 10th or 15th customer entering the supermarket and conduct the study on this sample.
This is random sampling with a system. From the sampling frame, a starting point is chosen at random, and choices thereafter are at regular intervals. For example, suppose you want to sample 8 houses from a street of 120 houses. 120/8=15, so every 15th house is chosen after a random starting point between 1 and 15. If the random starting point is 11, then the houses selected are 11, 26, 41, 56, 71, 86, 101, and 116.
If, as more frequently, the population is not evenly divisible (suppose you want to sample 8 houses out of 125, where 125/8=15.625), should you take every 15th house or every 16th house? If you take every 16th house, 8*16=128, so there is a risk that the last house chosen does not exist. On the other hand, if you take every 15th house, 8*15=120, so the last five houses will never be selected. The random starting point should instead be selected as a noninteger between 0 and 15.625 (inclusive on one endpoint only) to ensure that every house has equal chance of being selected; the interval should now be nonintegral (15.625); and each noninteger selected should be rounded up to the next integer. If the random starting point is 3.6, then the houses selected are 4, 19, 35, 51, 66, 82, 98, and 113, where there are 3 cyclic intervals of 15 and 5 intervals of 16.
To illustrate the danger of systematic skip concealing a pattern, suppose we were to sample a planned neighbourhood where each street has ten houses on each block. This places houses #1, 10, 11, 20, 21, 30... on block corners; corner blocks may be less valuable, since more of their area is taken up by streetfront etc. that is unavailable for building purposes. If we then sample every 10th household, our sample will either be made up only of corner houses (if we start at 1 or 10) or have no corner houses (any other start); either way, it will not be representative.
Systematic sampling may also be used with non-equal selection probabilities. In this case, rather than simply counting through elements of the population and selecting every kth unit, we allocate each element a space along a number line according to its selection probability. We then generate a random start from a uniform distribution between 0 and 1, and move along the number line in steps of 1.
Example: We have a population of 5 units (A to #). We want to give unit A a 20% probability of selection, unit B a 40% probability, and so on up to unit E (100%). Assuming we maintain alphabetical order, we allocate each unit to the following interval:
A: 0 to 0.2 B: 0.2 to 0.6 (=0.2+0.4) C: 0.6 to 1.2 (=0.6+0.6) D: 1.2 to 2.0 (=1.2+0.8) E: 2.0 to 3.0 (=2.0+1.0)
If our random start was 0.156, we would first select the unit whose interval contains this number (i.e. A). Next, we would select the interval containing 1.156 (element C), then 2.156 (element E). If instead our random start was 0.350, we would select from points 0.350 (B), 1.350 (D), and 2.350 (E).
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)
| Block Sampling (in accounting) | |
| sampling (in archaeology) | |
| stratified sampling (in archaeology) |
| What is systematic sampling and situations it can be use? | |
| The disadvantages of systematic sampling? | |
| Advantage and disavantage of systematic sampling? |
Copyrights:
![]() | Sci-Tech Dictionary. McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Scientific and Technical Terms. Copyright © 2003, 1994, 1989, 1984, 1978, 1976, 1974 by McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Read more | |
![]() | Accounting Dictionary. Dictionary of Accounting Terms. Copyright © 2005 by Barron's Educational Series, Inc. All rights reserved. Read more | |
![]() | Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Systematic sampling". Read more |
Mentioned in