Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Email
Answers.com

taphonomy

 
Dictionary: ta·phon·o·my   (tə-fŏn'ə-mē) pronunciation

n.
  1. The study of the conditions and processes by which organisms become fossilized.
  2. The conditions and processes of fossilization.

[Greek taphē, grave + -NOMY.]

taphonomic taph'o·nom'ic (tăf'ə-nŏm'ĭk) adj.
taphonomist ta·phon'o·mist n.

Search unanswered questions...
Enter a question here...
Search: All sources Community Q&A Reference topics
Sci-Tech Encyclopedia: Taphonomy
Top

A subdiscipline of paleobiology that investigates the processes of preservation and their influence on information in the fossil record. Processes include events that affected the organism during life, the transferral of organic matter from the biosphere to the lithosphere, and physiochemical interactions from the time of burial until collection. Besides the conspicuous fossil characteristics that reveal the organism's morphological and anatomical features, there are often less prominent details that record the fossil's history. Analyses of these details allow paleontologists to understand the mode of death or disarticulation; biological processes that may have modified the remains before burial, including their use by hominids; the response of the part to transport by animals, water, or wind; the residency time in a depositional setting before final entombment; and the alterations of tissues or skeletal parts within a wide range of chemical environments. The processes of fossilization appear to be environmentally site specific, resulting in a mosaic of preservational traits in terrestrial and marine environs. Few fossil assemblages are exactly identical with regard to formative processes, but general patterns exist. An understanding of taphonomic assemblage features within the environmental context allows for a more accurate interpretation of the fossil record.

Fossilized organic remains have successfully passed through several taphonomic stages, including necrology, biostratinomy, and diagenesis. The first taphonomic stage, necrology, generally refers to the death of an organism, although in the case of plants this is not necessarily a precondition. Plants shed many different parts during their life cycle. Death or part loss may be induced either physiologically (old age, disease, or temporal or climatic shedding) or traumatically (sudden catastrophic death or part loss in response to natural perturbations). Organic remains that are composed of more resistant biochemicals or mineralized hard parts have a higher probability of surviving than those composed of more labile and easily degraded compounds.

Biostratinomy involves all the processes and interactions that follow the necrological stage until final burial. Biotic interactions may include the effects of scavenging on carcasses, the use of discarded parts as domiciles, or borings in resistant structural parts. Abiotic processes include mechanical and physical alteration or degradation under different transport conditions (fragmentation and rounding in river channels), orientation or concentration of resistant parts under varying hydrological regimes, or reexposure and reworking of previously buried remains in response to changing geological circumstances. The biostratinomic stage ends when organic remains are covered by or included within sediment such that they are effectively isolated from the effects of biological degradation.

The processes that affect organic remains following burial belong to the third stage, diagenesis. These processes involve the physical (compaction) and chemical (cementation, recrystallization) changes in the sediment before, during, and after lithification. See also Fossil; Paleobotany; Paleoecology; Paleontology; Trace fossils.


Archaeology Dictionary: taphonomy
Top

[Ge]

Literally, ‘the laws of burial’, in archaeology it is the study of the processes by which animal bones and other remains are transformed by human and natural processes during their incorporation into archaeological deposits, their subsequent long-term preservation within those deposits, and their recovery by archaeologists. The aim is to separate out and understand those characteristics of an assemblage that reflect past social actions in contrast to any patterning that might be the product of selective preservation or sampling biases.

Wikipedia: Taphonomy
Top
Sponge borings and serpulid worm encrusters on a modern shell of the bivalve Mercenaria in North Carolina.

Taphonomy[note 1] is the study of decaying organisms over time and how they become fossilized (if they do). The term taphonomy, (from the Greek taphos - τάφος meaning burial, and nomos - νόμος meaning law), was introduced to paleontology in 1940 by Russian scientist, Ivan Efremov, to describe the study of the transition of remains, parts, or products of organisms, from the biosphere, to the lithosphere, i.e. the creation of fossil assemblages.[1][2]

Taphonomists study such phenomena as biostratinomy, decomposition, diagenesis, and encrustation and bioerosion by sclerobionts.[3] (Sclerobionts are organisms which dwell on hard substrates such as shells or rocks.)

One motivation behind the study of taphonomy is to better understand biases present in the fossil record. Fossils are ubiquitous in sedimentary rocks, yet paleontologists cannot draw the most accurate conclusions about the lives and ecology of the fossilized organisms without knowing about the processes involved in their fossilization. For example, if a fossil assemblage contains more of one type of fossil than another, one can either infer that that organism was present in greater numbers, or that its remains were more resistant to decomposition.

During the late 20th century, taphonomic data began to be applied to other paleontological subfields such as paleobiology, paleoceanography, ichnology (the study of trace fossils) and biostratigraphy. By coming to understand the oceanographic and ethological implications of observed taphonomic patterns, paleontologists have been able to provide new and meaningful interpretations and correlations that would have otherwise remained obscure in the fossil record.

An articulated wombat skeleton in Imperial-Diamond cave (Jenolan Caves).
The La Brea tar pits represent an unusual depositional environment for their epoch (Pleistocene) and location (southern California).

Archaeologists study taphonomic processes in order to determine how plant and animal (as well as human) remains accumulate and differentially preserve within archaeological sites. This is critical to determining whether these remains are associated with human activity. In addition, taphonomic processes may alter biological remains after they are deposited at a site. Some remains survive better than others over time, and can therefore bias an excavated collection.

Experimental taphonomy testing usually consists of exposing the remains of organisms to various altering processes, and then examining the effects of the exposure.

Contents

Preservation of biopolymers

The taphonomic pathways involved in relatively inert substances such as calcite (and to a lesser extent bone) are relatively obvious, as such body parts are stable and change little through time. However, the preservation of "soft tissue" is more interesting, as it requires more peculiar conditions. While usually only biomineralised material survives fossilisation, the preservation of soft tissue is not as rare as sometimes thought.[4]

Although chitin exoskeletons of arthropods are subject to decomposition, they often maintain shape during permineralization, especially if they are already somewhat mineralized.

Both DNA and proteins are unstable, and rarely survive more than hundreds of thousands of years before degrading.[5] Polysaccharides also have low preservation potential, unless they are highly cross-linked;[5] this interconnection is most common in structural tissues, and renders them resistant to chemical decay.[5] Such tissues (resistant chemical in brackets) include wood (lignin), spores and pollen (sporopollenin), the cuticles of plants (cutan) and animals, the cell walls of algae (algaenan),[5] and potentially the polysaccharide layer of some lichens.[citation needed] This interconnectedness makes the chemicals less prone to chemical decay, and also means they are a poorer source of energy so less likely to be digested by scavenging organisms.[5] After being subjected to heat and pressure, these cross-linked organic molecules typically 'cook' and become kerogen or short (<17 C atoms) aliphatic/aromatic carbon molecules.[5] Other factors affect the likelihood of preservation; for instance scleritisation renders the jaws of polychaetes more readily preserved than the chemically equivalent but non-sclerotised body cuticle.[5]

It was thought that only tough, cuticle type soft tissue could be preserved by Burgess shale type preservation,[6] but an increasing number of organisms are being discovered that lack such cuticle, such as the probable chordate Pikaia and the shellless Odontogriphus.[7]

It is a common misconception that anaerobic conditions are necessary for the preservation of soft tissue; indeed much decay is mediated by sulfate reducing bacteria which can only survive in anaerobic conditions.[5] Anoxia does, however, reduce the probability that scavengers will disturb the dead organism, and the activity of other organisms is undoubtedly one of the leading causes of soft-tissue destruction.[5]

Plant cuticle is more prone to preservation if it contains cutan, rather than cutin.[5]

Plants and algae produce the most preservable compounds, which are listed according to their preservation potential by Tegellaar (see reference).[8]

Notes

  1. ^ From greek Taphos; literally meaning 'study of the grave'

References

  1. ^ [http://www.astro.spbu.ru/staff/serg/interests/literature/efremov/tapharticle1.html Efremov, I. A. (1940) "Taphonomy: a new branch of paleontology" Pan-American Geology 74: pp. 81-93]
  2. ^ Martin, Ronald E. (1999) "1.1 The foundations of taphonomy" Taphonomy: A Process Approach Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, p.1, ISBN 0-521-59833-8
  3. ^ See Taylor and Wilson, 2003[page needed]
  4. ^ Briggs, D.E.G.; Kear, A.J. (1993), "Decay and preservation of polychaetes; taphonomic thresholds in soft-bodied organisms", Paleobiology 19 (1): 107–135, http://paleobiol.geoscienceworld.org/cgi/content/abstract/19/1/107 
  5. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Briggs, D.E.G. (1999), "Molecular taphonomy of animal and plant cuticles: selective preservation and diagenesis", Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 354 (1379): 7–17, doi:10.1098/rstb.1999.0356, http://journals.royalsociety.org/index/7TTY8KM0Y9PADF1X.pdf 
  6. ^ Butterfield, N.J. (1990), "Organic preservation of non-mineralizing organisms and the taphonomy of the Burgess Shale", Paleobiology 16 (3): 272–286, http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/2400788.pdf 
  7. ^ Conway Morris, S. (2008), "A Redescription of a Rare Chordate, Metaspriggina walcotti Simonetta and Insom, from the Burgess Shale (Middle Cambrian), British Columbia, Canada", Journal of Paleontology 82 (2): 424–430, doi:10.1666/06-130.1, http://www.bioone.org/perlserv/?request=get-document 
  8. ^ Tegelaar, E.W.; De Leeuw, J.W.; Derenne, S.; Largeau, C. (1989), "A reappraisal of kerogen formation", Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 53 (3): 03–3106, doi:10.1016/0016-7037(89)90191-9, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989GeCoA..53.3103T 

Further reading

  • Emig, C. C. (2002). Death: a key information in marine palaeoecology. In: Current topics on taphonomy and fossilization, Valencia. Col.lecio Encontres, 5: 21-26.
  • Greenwood, D. R. (1991), The taphonomy of plant macrofossils. In, Donovan, S. K. (Ed.), The processes of fossilisation, p.141-169. Belhaven Press.
  • Lyman, R. L. (1994), Vertebrate Taphonomy. Cambridge University Press.
  • Shipman, P. (1981), Life history of a fossil: An introduction to taphonomy and paleoecology. Harvard University Press.
  • Taylor, P. D. and Wilson, M. A. (2003), Palaeoecology and evolution of marine hard substrate communities. Earth-Science Reviews 62: 1-103. [1]

External links


 
 
Learn More
Leonard R. Brand
Algaenan
Parmularius

Post a question - any question - to the WikiAnswers community:

 

Copyrights:

Dictionary. The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition Copyright © 2007, 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Updated in 2009. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.  Read more
Sci-Tech Encyclopedia. McGraw-Hill Encyclopedia of Science and Technology. Copyright © 2005 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.  Read more
Archaeology Dictionary. The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Archaeology. Copyright © 2002, 2003 by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.  Read more
Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Taphonomy" Read more