answersLogoWhite

0

AllQ&AStudy Guides
Best answer

In Dante's "Inferno," Tarpeia is not featured as a character. She is a figure from Roman mythology, known for her betrayal of Rome. In Dante's work, characters are primarily drawn from Christian theology and classical literature, rather than Roman myths like Tarpeia.

This answer is:
Related answers

In Dante's "Inferno," Tarpeia is not featured as a character. She is a figure from Roman mythology, known for her betrayal of Rome. In Dante's work, characters are primarily drawn from Christian theology and classical literature, rather than Roman myths like Tarpeia.

View page

She was the daughter of the commander of the Roman citadel who tried to sell Rome out to a conquering enemy. All she asked for in return was what the soldiers wore on their left wrist, meaning their bejeweled gauntlets. They interpreted this as her wanting their shields so they threw them on her and she was crushed to death. They threw her body off a cliff which became known as the Tarpeian rock where Rome would later cast the bodies of only the most treacherous of people to sea.

View page

According to early Roman histories, when the Sabine ruler Titus Tatius attacked Rome after the Rape of the Sabines (8th century BC), the Vestal Virgin Tarpeia, daughter of Spurius Tarpeius, governor of the citadel on the Capitoline Hill, betrayed the Romans by opening the city gates for the Sabines in return for 'what they bore on their arms.' She believed that she would receive their golden bracelets. Instead, the Sabines crushed her to death with their shields, and her body was buried in the rock that now bears her name.[2]

About 500 BC, Lucius Tarquinius Superbus, the seventh legendary king of Rome, leveled the top of the rock, removing the shrines built by the Sabines, and built the Temple of Jupiter Capitolinus on the intermontium - the area between the two summits of the hill. The rock itself survived this remodelling, being used for executions well into Sulla's time[3] (early 1st century BC).

Note the Latin phrase, Arx tarpeia Capitoli proxima ("The Tarpeian Rock is close to the Capitol"): one's fall from grace can come swiftly.

To be hurled off the Tarpeian Rock was, in some sense, a fate worse than death, because it carried with it a stigma of shame. The standard method of execution in ancient Rome was by strangulation in the Tullianum. Rather, the rock was reserved for the most notorious traitors, and as a place of unofficial, extra-legal executions (for example, the near-execution of then-Senator Gaius Marcius

View page

No, this form of capital punishment did not exist.

The most gruesome forms of capital punishment were scourging (being beaten to death) ad bestia (devoured by animals) which was a sentence to the arena where you were left at the mercy of predator animals, and poena cullei (penalty of the sack). The person was sown into a leather sack together with a dog, a monkey and a cockerel. This was the worse penalty because it stripped dignity more than the others and because you would not be given proper burial.

Other forms of capital punishment were; beheading (percussio securi), this was the most common form, burning at the stake (this was for arson, slaves who conspired against their masters, deserters and enemies of the state) strangling in prison (strangulatio) throwing a person from the part of the prison called Robur (precipitatio de robore) throwing a person from the Tarpeian rock (dejectio e rupe Tarpeia) and throwing a person into the river (projectio in profluentem). For slaves and non-Romans there was also Crucifixion (in crucem actio). Roman citizens could not be crucified.

Most people who were sentenced to death, especially for the most gruesome forms of punishment, were poor people. The rich mostly found ways of getting out of it or were treated leniently, except for cases of parricide, where even the most gruesome forms of death were not spared.

The Vestal virgins (the priestesses of the goddess Vesta) who were caught breaking their vow of chastity were buried alive.

There was also free decision of death (liberum mortis arbitrium) where you were allowed to choose the method of execution. This was in essence an order to commit suicide, which was preferable to other sentences because it spared the humiliation of a public execution, your property was not confiscated, and you would be given a proper burial.

View page

Anything. Being a patriarchal society, Roman men had absolute power over their children, wives, and sometimes even extended family in certain cases. They could kill them if they liked, though that was looked down on. So were many harsher punishments; you must remember that these children (the boys, at least,) would grow into the next tier of Roman aristocracy in many cases. They weren't mistreated too often or severely.

Striking a child would be a simple and common punishment. We don't have exact records on Roman society, I'm getting this last punishment from a passage regarding a group of rowdy children refusing to do their schoolwork. Most of our ideas on Rome are from reliefs and writings, and people don't often carve pictures of them beating up kids. Unless you're Caligula, in which case graffiti might depict something similar. But I digress.

I hope I answered your question.

View page
Featured study guide
📓
See all Study Guides
✍️
Create a Study Guide
Search results