(mathematics) Complex functions used in the study of Riemann surfaces and of elliptic functions and elliptic integrals; they are:


where q = exp πiτ, and τ is a constant complex number with positive imaginary part.
| Sci-Tech Dictionary: theta functions |
(mathematics) Complex functions used in the study of Riemann surfaces and of elliptic functions and elliptic integrals; they are:


where q = exp πiτ, and τ is a constant complex number with positive imaginary part.
| 5min Related Video: Theta function |
| Wikipedia: Theta function |
In mathematics, theta functions are special functions of several complex variables. They are important in several areas, including the theories of abelian varieties and moduli spaces, and of quadratic forms. They have also been applied to soliton theory. When generalized to a Grassmann algebra, they also appear in quantum field theory, specifically string theory and D-branes.
The most common form of theta function is that occurring in the theory of elliptic functions. With respect to one of the complex variables (conventionally called z), a theta function has a property expressing its behavior with respect to the addition of a period of the associated elliptic functions, making it a quasiperiodic function. In the abstract theory this comes from a line bundle condition of descent.
The Jacobi theta function (named after Carl Gustav Jacob Jacobi) is a function defined for two complex variables z and τ, where z can be any complex number and τ is confined to the upper half-plane, which means it has positive imaginary part. It is given by the formula

If τ is fixed, this becomes a Fourier series for a periodic entire function of z with period 1; in this case, the theta function satisfies the identity

The function also behaves very regularly with respect to its quasi-period τ and satisfies the functional equation

where a and b are integers.
The Jacobi theta function may also be written with a double 0 subscript:

Three auxiliary (or half-period) theta functions are defined by
![\begin{align}
\vartheta_{01}(z;\tau)& = \vartheta\!\left(z+{\textstyle\frac{1}{2}};\tau\right)\\[3pt]
\vartheta_{10}(z;\tau)& = \exp\!\left({\textstyle\frac{1}{4}}\pi i \tau + \pi i z\right)
\vartheta\!\left(z + {\textstyle\frac{1}{2}}\tau;\tau\right)\\[3pt]
\vartheta_{11}(z;\tau)& = \exp\!\left({\textstyle\frac{1}{4}}\pi i \tau + \pi i\!\left(z+{\textstyle
\frac{1}{2}}\right)\right)\vartheta\!\left(z+{\textstyle\frac{1}{2}}\tau + {\textstyle\frac{1}{2}};\tau\right).
\end{align}](http://wpcontent.answers.com/math/b/2/c/b2ca6aa73fe0b2583ed853e80f4a419a.png)
This notation follows Riemann and Mumford; Jacobi's original formulation was in terms of the nome q = exp(πiτ) rather than τ. In Jacobi's notation the θ-functions are written like this:

The above definitions of the Jacobi theta functions are by no means unique. See Jacobi theta functions - notational variations for further discussion.
If we set z = 0 in the above theta functions, we obtain four functions of τ only, defined on the upper half-plane (sometimes called theta constants.) These can be used to define a variety of modular forms, and to parametrize certain curves; in particular, the Jacobi identity is

which is the Fermat curve of degree four.
Jacobi's identities describe how theta functions transform under the modular group, which is generated by τ ↦ τ+1 and τ ↦ -1/τ. We already have equations for the first transformation; for the second, let

Then
![\begin{align}
\vartheta_{00}\!\left({\textstyle\frac{z}{\tau}; \frac{-1}{\tau}}\right)& = \alpha\,\vartheta_{00}(z; \tau)\quad&
\vartheta_{01}\!\left({\textstyle\frac{z}{\tau}; \frac{-1}{\tau}}\right)& = \alpha\,\vartheta_{10}(z; \tau)\\[3pt]
\vartheta_{10}\!\left({\textstyle\frac{z}{\tau}; \frac{-1}{\tau}}\right)& = \alpha\,\vartheta_{01}(z; \tau)\quad&
\vartheta_{11}\!\left({\textstyle\frac{z}{\tau}; \frac{-1}{\tau}}\right)& = -\alpha\,\vartheta_{11}(z; \tau).
\end{align}](http://wpcontent.answers.com/math/0/d/d/0ddcb3ae575ce168891d166e29262a1d.png)
Instead of expressing the Theta functions in terms of
and
, we may express them in terms of arguments
and the nome q, where
and
. In this form, the functions become
![\begin{align}
\vartheta_{00}(w, q)& = \sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty (w^2)^n q^{n^2}\quad&
\vartheta_{01}(w, q)& = \sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty (-1)^n (w^2)^n q^{n^2}\\[3pt]
\vartheta_{10}(w, q)& = \sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty (w^2)^{\left(n+\frac{1}{2}\right)}
q^{\left(n + \frac{1}{2}\right)^2}\quad&
\vartheta_{11}(w, q)& = i \sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty (-1)^n (w^2)^{\left(n+\frac{1}{2}\right)}
q^{\left(n + \frac{1}{2}\right)^2}.
\end{align}](http://wpcontent.answers.com/math/b/d/1/bd1bdde5924f1aa2ca7bb7ef9a073317.png)
We see that the Theta functions can also be defined in terms of w and q, without a direct reference to the exponential function. These formulas can, therefore, be used to define the Theta functions over other fields where the exponential function might not be everywhere defined, such as fields of p-adic numbers.
The Jacobi triple product tells us that for complex numbers w and q with |q| < 1 and w ≠ 0 we have

It can be proven by elementary means, as for instance in Hardy and Wright's An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers.
If we express the theta function in terms of the nome q = exp(πiτ) and w = exp(πiz) then

We therefore obtain a product formula for the theta function in the form

Expanding terms out, the Jacobi triple product can also be written

which we may also write as

This form is valid in general but clearly is of particular interest when z is real. Similar product formulas for the auxiliary theta functions are



The Jacobi theta functions have the following integral representations:




See [1]

![\varphi(\frac{1}{e^{\pi}} ) = \frac{\sqrt[4]{\pi}}{\Gamma(\frac{3}{4})}](http://wpcontent.answers.com/math/4/0/3/40372d83352f6b6e6f409b2aa52afa9e.png)
![\varphi(\frac{1}{e^{2\pi}} ) = \frac{\sqrt[4]{2\pi+\sqrt2\pi}}{2\Gamma(\frac{3}{4})}](http://wpcontent.answers.com/math/0/a/3/0a3947d8ae13f40fd06a479ccd268ff2.png)
![\varphi(\frac{1}{e^{3\pi}}) = \frac{\sqrt[8]{1701{\pi}^2+972\sqrt3{\pi}^2}}{3\Gamma(\frac{3}{4})}](http://wpcontent.answers.com/math/c/0/7/c07671baafe537934709729376eac1ea.png)
![\varphi(\frac{1}{e^{4\pi}}) =\frac{\sqrt[4]{8\pi}+2\sqrt[4]{\pi}}{4\Gamma(\frac{3}{4})}](http://wpcontent.answers.com/math/5/f/7/5f7af03332f4e14a0672a498d69017d7.png)
![\varphi(\frac{1}{e^{5\pi}} ) =\frac{\sqrt[4]{225\pi+ 100\sqrt5 \pi}}{125\Gamma(\frac{3}{4})}](http://wpcontent.answers.com/math/1/a/6/1a6768bc6dc671095101160dfd29a925.png)
![\varphi(\frac{1}{e^{6\pi}}) = \frac{\sqrt[3]{3\sqrt{2}+3\sqrt[4]{3}+2\sqrt{3}-\sqrt[4]{27}+\sqrt[4]{1728}-4}\cdot \sqrt[8]{243{\pi}^2}}{6\sqrt[6]{1+\sqrt6-\sqrt2-\sqrt3}{\Gamma(\frac{3}{4})}}](http://wpcontent.answers.com/math/9/9/e/99e7bd7076c6501dcb5b1d4b0e99e893.png)
The relation

was used by Riemann to prove the functional equation for the Riemann zeta function, by means of the integral
![\Gamma\left(\frac{s}{2}\right) \pi^{-s/2} \zeta(s) =
\frac{1}{2}\int_0^\infty\left[\vartheta(0;it)-1\right]
t^{s/2}\frac{dt}{t}](http://wpcontent.answers.com/math/f/2/9/f294262e63d65276dffaaea1019d70f0.png)
which can be shown to be invariant under substitution of s by 1 − s. The corresponding integral for z not zero is given in the article on the Hurwitz zeta function.
The theta function was used by Jacobi to construct (in a form adapted to easy calculation) his elliptic functions as the quotients of the above four theta functions, and could have been used by him to construct Weierstrass's elliptic functions also, since

where the second derivative is with respect to z and the constant c is defined so that the Laurent expansion of
at z = 0 has zero constant term.
Let η be the Dedekind eta function. Then

The Jacobi theta function is the unique solution to the one-dimensional heat equation with periodic boundary conditions at time zero. This is most easily seen by taking z = x to be real, and taking τ = it with t real and positive. Then we can write

which solves the heat equation

That this solution is unique can be seen by noting that at t = 0, the theta function becomes the Dirac comb:

where δ is the Dirac delta function. Thus, general solutions can be specified by convolving the (periodic) boundary condition at t = 0 with the theta function.
The Jacobi theta function is invariant under the action of a discrete subgroup of the Heisenberg group. This invariance is presented in the article on the theta representation of the Heisenberg group.
If F is a quadratic form in n variables, then the theta function associated with F is

with the sum extending over the lattice of integers Zn. This theta function is a modular form of weight n/2 (on an appropriately defined subgroup) of the modular group. In the Fourier expansion,

the numbers RF(k) are called the representation numbers of the form.
Let

be set of symmetric square matrices whose imaginary part is positive definite. Hn is called the Siegel upper half-space and is the multi-dimensional analog of the upper half-plane. The n-dimensional analogue of the modular group is the symplectic group Sp(2n,Z); for n = 1, Sp(2,Z) = SL(2,Z). The n-dimensional analog of the congruence subgroups is played by
.
Then, given
, the Riemann theta function is defined as

Here,
is an n-dimensional complex vector, and the superscript T denotes the transpose. The Jacobi theta function is then a special case, with n = 1 and
where
is the upper half-plane.
The Riemann theta converges absolutely and uniformly on compact subsets of 
The functional equation is

which holds for all vectors
, and for all
and
.
The Poincaré series generalizes the theta series to automorphic forms with respect to arbitrary Fuchsian groups.
This article incorporates material from Integral representations of Jacobi theta functions on PlanetMath, which is licensed under the GFDL.
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)
| Best of the Web: Theta function |
Some good "Theta function" pages on the web:
Math mathworld.wolfram.com |
| theta | |
| Q-theta function | |
| Elliptic gamma function |
| Does 4 cosine theta sine theta equal sine 4 theta? | |
| What does 'theta' mean? | |
| What precedes theta? |
Copyrights:
![]() | Sci-Tech Dictionary. McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Scientific and Technical Terms. Copyright © 2003, 1994, 1989, 1984, 1978, 1976, 1974 by McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Read more | |
![]() | Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Theta function". Read more |
Mentioned in