answersLogoWhite

0

AllQ&AStudy Guides
Best answer

The name Theudas is pronounced as thee-yoo-das. The first syllable sounds like the word "thee," and the second syllable rhymes with "you" and "doe." The emphasis is on the second syllable.

This answer is:
Related answers

The name Theudas is pronounced as thee-yoo-das. The first syllable sounds like the word "thee," and the second syllable rhymes with "you" and "doe." The emphasis is on the second syllable.

View page

The author of Acts of the Apostles did not use the writings of Josephus as his main source, but did rely on them for historical background. Many parallels have been found between the works of Josephus and some representative examples follow: * Josephus used the term sects or 'philosophical schools' (Greek: haireseis), to describe the Pharisees, Sadducees and Essenes. Luke was the only other author known to have described the Pharisees, Sadducees and Essenes this way (Acts 5:17, 15:5, 26:5), and he also referred to Christianity as another philosophical school of the Jews (Acts 24:5, 28:22). * Moreover, Luke had Paul call the Pharisees the 'most precise school' among the Jews in the reference at 26:5. Only Josephus and Luke referred to the Pharisees as the 'most precise school'. * Luke had Gamaliel speak about an uprising that had taken place under Theudas, placing this speech in Acts 5:36, before the martyrdom of Stephen. In the next verse, Luke said that after this man, Judas of Galilee rose up. The uprising by Theudas occurred within the procuratorship of Fadus, who was procurator in the years 44-46 CE. However, Acts 11:25-28, tells us that Paul was already a Christian before the famine that also started around the same time as this uprising. It is evident that Luke knew nothing of Theudas from Christian sources, but inserted mention of him into the account as a piece of useful history that Luke learnt from Josephus, and no where else. We can establish that because, when Josephus mentioned Theudas, he immediately followed with commentary on the sons of Judas and then took the opportunity to describe the much earlier actions of Judas himself. Luke repeated the incorrect sequence of Theudas and Judas, which only makes sense in the context of Josephus' narrative - a clear sign that Luke relied on information from Josephus. * Luke, writing in Greek, used the term sicarii, a Latin word for assassins. Josephus, who also wrote in Greek, seems to have been the first to use this foreign word as a term for Jewish rebels who carried out assassinations under cover of urban crowds. * Both Josephus and Luke mentioned three specific rebel leaders, and no other, even though Josephus says there were numerous such men. These rebels were Theudas, Judas and 'the Egyptian'. Luke had the chief captain ask Paul whether he was the Egyptian who led four thousand sicarii (KJV translated as 'murderers') into the desert (Acts 21:38). Far from leading anyone into the desert, 'the Egyptian' wanted to bring down the walls of Jerusalem by a miracle. Ancient writers did not acknowledge their sources using footnotes in the style of modern academic authors, but they did have another way of acknowledge their sources, known as mimesis. This was an intellectually amusing technique that required placing a clue, or flag, within the text, enabling others to identify the source. But the flag must not be obvious - it had to be a clue that needed to be searched for and identified. Josephus had dedicated Jewish Antiquities to Epaphroditus, a real name that meant 'Touched by Aphrodite'. Luke dedicated both the Gospel and Acts to Theophilus, which means 'Friend of God'. This could be a real name but is an apparent transvaluation of Epaphroditus.

View page

There was total of 30 years of history covered by the Acts of the Apostles.
Not as many as you might think; less than 25
It covers 30 years of history.
The actual value varies, but most people generally agree that it covers from about 29 A.D. to about 64 A.D., meaning that it covers around 35 years worth of history.
Acts covers the period from approximately 33AD to 62AD.

View page

In Acts 5:34-39 Gamaliel's principle can be found. After Stephen defends himself before the Sanhedrin Gamaliel decides that "For if their purpose or activity is of human origin, it will fail. If, on the other hand, it is from God, you will not be able to stop these men; you will only find yourselves fighting against God."(39)

Although at the time it did convince the Sanhedrin to let Stephen go, the crowd went on to stone him to death. At the time the principle held true in the court room, but it can not always be said to be reliable.

View page

Oddly enough, the evidence emanates from the book of "Acts."

Paul and the other apostles were being arrested, persecuted, imprisoned and beaten... supposedly suffering daily for the name of a person who, as alleged by some, never existed.

On one occasion of Peter and other apostles' arrest and hearing proceedings for their "teaching in Jesus' name":

"...a Pharisee named Gamaliel, a teacher of the law, who was honored by all the people, stood up in the Sanhedrin and ordered that the men (Peter and the apostles) be put outside for a little while.. Then he addressed them (the Sanhedrin): 'Men of Israel, consider carefully what you intend to do to these men.

"Some time ago Theudas appeared, claiming to be somebody, and about four hundred men rallied to him. He was killed, and all his followers were dispersed, and it all came to nothing. After him, Judas the Galilean appeared in the days of the census and led a band of people in revolt. He too was killed, and all his followers were scattered.

"Therefore, in the present case I advise you: Leave these men alone! Let them go! For if their purpose or activity is of human origin, it will fail. But if it is from God, you will not be able to stop these men; you will only find yourselves fighting against God.'" (Acts 5:34-39 NIV)

There is the evidence. If the "causes" of the revolutionaries, Theudas and Judas the Galilean, who did exist, died off with their deaths, along with their names - how could a nonexistent person with the name of Jesus Christ have endured more than 2000 years... unless He is quite real... and "is from God?"

The Jewish Sanhedrin wasn't questioning Peter and the apostles regarding the existence of Jesus... but because:

"...'We gave you strict orders not to teach in this name,' he said. 'Yet you have filled Jerusalem with your teaching and are determined to make us guilty of this man's blood.'" (Acts 5:28 NIV)

There was no accusation that Peter and the apostles "made Jesus up." If they had... there surely would be no "Christianity" in the world to this day.

View page
Featured study guide
📓
See all Study Guides
✍️
Create a Study Guide
Search results