Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Email
Answers.com

Transylvania

 
Dictionary: Tran·syl·va·nia   (trăn'sĭl-vān'yə, -vā'nē-ə) pronunciation


A historical region of western Romania bounded by the Transylvanian Alps and the Carpathian Mountains. Part of the Roman province of Dacia after A.D. 107, it was later overrun by Germanic peoples and came under Hungarian rule in 1003. Transylvania passed to various powers over the following centuries and finally became part of modern-day Romania after World War II.

Transylvanian Tran'syl·va'ni·an adj. & n.

 

Search unanswered questions...
Enter a question here...
Search: All sources Community Q&A Reference topics
Transylvania
Historic region, northwestern and central Romania. It comprises a plateau surrounded by the Carpathian Mountains and the Transylvanian Alps. It formed the nucleus of the Dacian kingdom and was included in the Roman province of Dacia in the 2nd century AD. The Magyars (Hungarians) conquered the area at the end of the 9th century. When Hungary was divided between the Habsburgs and the Turks in the 16th century, Transylvania became an autonomous principality within the Ottoman Empire. It was attached to Habsburg-controlled Hungary at the end of the 17th century. Transylvania was the scene of severe fighting in the Hungarian revolution against Austria in 1848. When Austria-Hungary was defeated in World War I, the Romanians of Transylvania proclaimed the land united with Romania. Hungary regained the northern portion during World War II, but the entire region was ceded to Romania in 1947.

For more information on Transylvania, visit Britannica.com.

 
Columbia Encyclopedia:

Transylvania

Top
Transylvania (trăn'sĭlvā'nyə), Rom. Transilvania or Ardeal, Hung. Erdély, Ger. Siebenbürgen, historic region and province (21,292 sq mi/55,146 sq km), central Romania. A high plateau, Transylvania is separated in the S from Walachia by the Transylvanian Alps and in the E from Moldavia and Bukovina by the Carpathian Mts. (of which the Transylvanian Alps are a continuation). In the north and west Transylvania borders on Crişana-Maramureş and in the SW on the Banat. The Transylvanian plateau, 1,000 to 1,600 ft (305-488 m) high, is drained by the Mureşul River and other tributaries of the Danube. Cluj-Napoca is the chief city; other major urban centers are Braşov, Sibiu, and Tîrgu-Mureş.

Economically and culturally one of the most advanced regions of Romania, Transylvania is rich in mineral resources, notably lignite, iron, lead, manganese, gold, copper, natural gas, salt, and sulfur. There are large iron and steel, chemical, and textile industries. Stock raising, agriculture, wine production, and fruit growing are important occupations. Timber is another valuable resource. Sizable Hungarian and German minorities, as well as Gypsies, live in Transylvania.

History

The area now constituting Transylvania became part of the Roman Empire in A.D. 107. After the withdrawal (A.D. 271) of the Romans from the region it was overrun, between the 3d and 10th cent., by the Visigoths, the Huns, the Gepidae, the Avars, and the Slavs. The Magyar tribes first entered the region in the 5th cent., but they did not fully control it until 1003, when King Stephen I placed it under the Hungarian crown. The valleys in the east and southeast were settled by the Székely, a people akin to the Magyars. It is not known, however, whether they came into Transylvania with or before the Magyars.

In the 12th and 13th cent. the areas in the south and northeast were settled by German colonists called (then and now) Saxons. Siebenbürgen, the German name for Transylvania, derives from the seven principal fortified towns founded there by the Saxons. The German influence became more marked when, early in the 13th cent., King Andrew II of Hungary called on the Teutonic Knights to protect Transylvania from the Cumans, who were followed (1241) by the Mongol invaders. Large numbers of Romanians, called Vlachs or Walachians, were in the region by 1222, although the exact date that their penetration began is disputed. Originally seminomadic shepherds, the Vlachs soon settled down to agriculture.

The administration of Transylvania was in the hands of a royal governor, or voivode, who by the mid-13th cent. controlled the whole region. Society was divided into three privileged "nations," the Magyars, the Székely, and the Saxons. These "nations," however, corresponded to social rather than strictly ethnic divisions. Although the nonprivileged class of serfs consisted mostly of Vlachs, it also included some people of Saxon, Székely, and Magyar origin. A few Vlachs, notably John Hunyadi, hero of the Turkish wars, joined the ranks of the nobility. After the suppression (1437) of a peasant revolt the three "nations" solemnly renewed their union; the rebels were cruelly repressed, and serfdom became more firmly entrenched than ever.

When the main Hungarian army and King Louis II were slain (1526) in the battle of Mohács, John Zapolya, voivode of Transylvania, took advantage of his military strength and put himself at the head of the nationalist Hungarian party, which opposed the succession of Ferdinand of Austria (later Emperor Ferdinand I) to the Hungarian throne. As John I he was elected king of Hungary, while another party recognized Ferdinand. In the ensuing struggle Zapolya received the support of Sultan Sulayman I, who after Zapolya's death (1540) overran central Hungary on the pretext of protecting Zapolya's son, John II. Hungary was now divided into three sections: W Hungary, under Austrian rule; central Hungary, under Turkish rule; and semi-independent Transylvania, where Austrian and Turkish influences vied for supremacy for nearly two centuries.

The Hungarian magnates of Transylvania resorted to a policy of duplicity in order to preserve independence. The Báthory family, which came to power on the death (1571) of John II, ruled Transylvania as princes under Ottoman, and briefly under Hapsburg, suzerainty until 1602, but their rule was interrupted by the incursion of Michael the Brave of Walachia and by Austrian military intervention. In 1604, Stephen Bocskay led a rebellion against Austrian rule, and in 1606 he was recognized by the emperor as prince of Transylvania. Under Bocskay's successors-especially Gabriel Bethlen and George I Rákóczy-Transylvania had its golden age. The principality was the chief center of Hungarian culture and humanism, the main bulwark of Protestantism in E Europe, and the only European country where Roman Catholics, Calvinists, Lutherans, and Unitarians lived in mutual tolerance. Orthodox Romanians, however, were denied equal rights.

After the Turkish defeat near Vienna (1683), Transylvania vainly battled the growing Austrian influence, and its alliance with Turkey under Emeric Thököly and with France under Francis II Rákóczy proved fatal to its independence. In 1711, Austrian control was definitely established over all Hungary and Transylvania, and the princes of Transylvania were replaced by Austrian governors. The proclamation (1765) of Transylvania as a grand principality was a mere formality. The pressure of Austrian bureaucratic rule gradually eroded the traditional independence of Transylvania. In 1791 the Romanians petitioned Leopold II of Austria for recognition as the fourth "nation" of Transylvania and for religious equality. The Transylvanian diet rejected their demands, restoring the Romanians to their old status.

In 1848 the Magyars proclaimed the union of Transylvania with Hungary, promising the Romanians abolition of serfdom in return for their support against Austria. The Romanians rejected the offer and instead rose against the Magyar national state. In the fighting that followed (1849) between the Hungarians and the Austro-Russian forces (supported by the Romanians and most of the Saxons), the Hungarian republic of Louis Kossuth was suppressed. The ensuing period of Austrian military government (1849-60) was disastrous for the Magyars but greatly benefited the Romanian peasants, who were given land and otherwise favored by the Austrian authorities. However, in the compromise (Ausgleich) of 1867, which established the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy, Transylvania became an integral part of Hungary, and the Romanians, having tasted equality, were once more subjected to Magyar domination.

After World War I the Romanians of Transylvania proclaimed at a convention at Alba Iulia (1918) their union with Romania. Transylvania was then seized by Romania and was formally ceded by Hungary in the Treaty of Trianon (1920). The expropriation of the estates of Magyar magnates, the distribution of the lands to the Romanian peasants, and the policy of cultural Romanianization that followed were major causes of friction between Hungary and Romania. It was now the turn of the Magyar and German nationalists to complain of Romanian oppression. During World War II, Hungary annexed (1940) N Transylvania, which was, however, returned to Romania after the war. Many of the Saxons of Transylvania fled to Germany before the arrival of the Soviet army, and more followed after the fall of the Communist government in 1989.

Bibliography

See K. Verdery, Transylvanian Villagers: Three Centuries of Political, Economic, and Ethnic Change (1983); M. G. Lehrer, Transylvania: History and Reality (1987).


The Vampire Book:

Transylvania

Top

Transylvania (literally, the land beyond the forest) is the area of north central Romania most identified in the public mind with vampires. Its reputation derives from being designated as the home of Dracula in Bram Stoker's novel. At the beginning of Dracula Jonathan Harker traveled from Budapest, Hungary into northern Transylvania, then a part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. He described the land as one of great beauty but a wild and little known place. His final destination was Castle Dracula, a location not noted on any map. Although Harker's destination was a fictional site, the land he moved through was very real. Stoker had never been to Transylvania but had read about it in books at the British Museum, particularly Emily Gerard's Land Beyond the Forest.

Transylvania was the center of a powerful state in the first century C.E. The territory was partially conquered by Trajan in 106 C.E. Over the next several centuries, the merger of the Roman and native people created the distinctive people known today as the Romanians. Christianity of a Roman Latin variety made its initial entrance into the area at this time, although over the centuries the Romanians aligned themselves with the Eastern Orthodox Church headquartered in Constantinople. The area was subject to numerous invasions, more or less successful, by a variety of nomadic people. Most importantly, in the tenth century, incursions and eventually conquest by the Hungarians began. By the thirteenth century, Hungary claimed hegemony in Transylvania, although the various divisions continued to be ruled by the local territorial lords, the voevades.

The Hungarians engaged in several acts of social engineering. First, they persuaded the Szekely people of western Transylvania to move into the mountainous area in the east and assume the task of border control. The Szekelys emerged as great warriors. Secondly, to improve the economy, the Hungarians invited Germans into southern Transylvania and gave them generous tax benefits. Although they originated from throughout Germany , these people became known as the Saxons. They were most prominent in the towns that controlled the mountain passes between Transylvania and Wallachia, located immediately south of the Carpathians. (Today, many of the towns of Transylvania have three names-one each in German, Hungarian, and Romanian.)

By the fourteenth century, there were four main groups in Transylvania: Hungarians, Hungarian-speaking Szekelys, Saxons, and Romanians. The Romanians, although a majority of the population, were the conquered people, and measures to suppress them began in earnest. The Roman Catholic Hungarians launched systematic conversion efforts directed at the Orthodox population. Specific laws were passed to disenfranchise the Romanians, culminating in the 1366 ruling that called into question the traditional status of any Romanian aristocracy who refused to become Roman Catholic and whose loyalty to the Hungarian crown was questionable. Hungary's increasingly oppressive control led many Romanians to cross the mountains into Moldavia and Wallachia.

The migration south promoted the organization of an independent central government in Wallachia in the fourteenth century, although by the next century, it found itself in a constant battle with the Hungarians to the north and the Turks to the south, both of whom wanted to control it. It was in that tension that Vlad Dracul came to the Wallachian throne in 1436. He came to the throne at the same time that John Hunyadi, an outstanding Romanian, emerged in Transylvania. Hunyadi became the governor of Transylvania and his power rivaled that of the king. Hunyadi's reputation promoted the cause of his son, Matthais who, at a point of weakness in the Hungarian royal family, became king of Hungary in 1458. Vlad Dracul opposed Hunyadi and was killed in 1447.

Prior to ascending to the throne, Vlad Dracul was the commander of the guard in Transylvania. He settled in Sighisoara around 1430 and, a short time after his arrival, his son (also named Vlad) was born. The son, later to become known as Vlad the Impaler, was too young to succeed his father in 1447, but eventually gained the throne within months of Hunyadi's death in 1456. As the ruler of Wallachia he claimed the Transylvanian districts of Amlas and Fagaras. More importantly, he moved against the Saxon merchants of Sibiu (for housing his relatives who were claimants to his throne) and Brasov (whose mercantile policies worked against Vlad's attempt to build the Wallachian economy).

Vlad the Impaler, the historical Dracula, was Wallachian (although he was born in Transylvania), and most of the activities he was famous for occurred there. Bram Stoker placed the fictional Count Dracula in northeastern Transylvania. To arrive at Castle Dracula, Jonathan Harker passed through Klausenburgh (Clug-Napoca) and traveled to Bistritz (Bistrita). This section of Transylvania was correctly identified as territory traditionally ruled by the Szekelys and thus he identified Count Dracula as a member of the traditional ruling class. The issue was confused as Stoker attempted to merge the fictional Count Dracula with Vlad the Impaler, the man known for his battles against the Turks and the "bravest of the sons of the `land beyond the forest.'"

Stoker also identified Dracula as the arch vampire. Transylvanian vampire lore was merely a variation of the vampire beliefs found throughout Romania and shared by neighboring groups of Slavs and Gypsies . Historically, the land had no particular reputation as a home to vampires.

Today, Transylvania has become a major tourist attraction, drawing people not only for skiing in the Carpathian Mountains and the wine, but for Dracula buffs. There is now a Count Dracula Hotel at the middle of the Borgo Pass that hosts a variety of tours and events annually. The Golden Krone (Crown) Hotel in Bistriz serves the same meal eaten by Jonathan Harker in Dracula. Vlad the Impaler's birthplace in Sighisoara and his palace in Tirgoviste provide stopping places for tourists heading northward from Bucharest, and further development seems inevitable.

Bodea, Cornelia, and Virgil Candea. Transylvania in the History of the Romanians. New York: Columbia University Press, 1982. 181 pp.
Florescu, Radu R., and Raymond T. McNally. Dracula: Prince of Many Faces. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company, 1989. 261 pp.
Mackenzie, Andrew. Dracula Country. London: Arthur Barker, 1977. 176 pp.
Mehedinti, S. What Is Transylvania? Miami Beach, FL: Romanian Historical Studies, 1986. 121 pp.
Miller, Elizabeth. "Typing Trannsylvania." In Elizabeth Miller. Reflections on Dracula: Ten Essays. White Rock, BC: Transylvania Press, 1997, pp. 47en>68.
Walker, Gerald, and Lorraine Wright. "Locating Dracula: Contextualizing the Geography of Trannsylvania." In Carold Margaret Davison, ed. Bram Stoker's Dracula: Sucking through the Century, 1897-1997. Toronto: Durndun Press, 1997, pp. 49-74.


Holocaust:

Transylvania

Top

Region in Central Europe that belonged to Hungary until 1920, at which time it was given to Romania. On August 30, 1940, Northern Transylvania was transferred back to Hungary, as a reward for siding with Germany.

Northern Transylvania had a population of 2.5 million, including 165,000 Jews. Most lived in the areas of Dej, Cluj, Sighet Marmatiei, Tirgu Mures, Oradea, and Satu-Mare. Many Transylvanian Jews were happy to join Hungary after 20 years under Romania; however, they were soon subjected to Hungary's anti-Jewish regulations.

The Germans occupied Hungary in March 1944, and quickly began readying the Jews for the "final solution." They divided Northern Transylvania into two districts. Jews were not allowed to travel or communicate with Jews in other areas, so each community was left isolated. The only way to make contact was through the Jewish Council of budapest, which usually just passed on instructions from the German and Hungarian authorities. On May 2 Jews were forbidden to leave their homes, except for one short hour in the morning to shop. The next day, the Nazis began transferring Jews to ghettos; the operation ran smoothly and took only 10 days. There was hardly any resistance. Some Jews did not realize what was going to happen to them, others thought they were being sent away to work, and some hoped the Allies would soon win the war. In the villages and smaller towns, the Jews were gathered in their synagogues and community buildings; after a few days, they were moved to the ghettos located in larger cities. In Dej, the Jews were moved to the forest. Each ghetto had its own judenrat, which carried out the instructions given them by the main Jewish Council or by the Hungarian or German authorities. Each ghetto also had a building, nicknamed the "mint," where Jews were tortured into revealing the whereabouts of their valuables.

The Jews did not stay long in the ghettos---131,641 Jews were soon deported to auschwitz. The transports lasted from May 16 to June 27, 1944. Only the Jews working in labor units and a few exemptions were left behind.

Romania retained control of Southern Transylvania. In 1941 there were 40,937 Jews living there. During the reign of the "National Legionary Government" in 1940, local authorities terrorized the Jews of Southern Transylvania. Their property was systematically looted and they were kicked out of their homes. Hundreds of Jews were tortured into "selling" their property to the authorities. However, when the Legionary government toppled in January 1941, the situation improved slightly. The conditions in the forced labor units were somewhat alleviated, and few Southern Transylvanian Jews were sent to labor battalions.

During the summer of 1941, Ion antonescu, the head of the Romanian government, ordered all Romanian Jews---including those in Southern Transylvania---expelled from their villages and towns. The operation was executed haphazardly, causing the Jews much distress. During the expulsion, the authorities found that the large cities where they had planned to station the Jews were not suitable. Thus, in late 1941 and early 1942, the Jews who had already been sent to the larger towns were now moved to makeshift ghettos. By the summer of 1942 they were faced with another threat: deportation. Southern Transylvanian Jewish leaders traveled to bucharest to enlist the help of Romanian Jewish leader Wilhelm filderman.

By the summer of 1943, the Jews' situation had improved somewhat. In 1944 they themselves were able to rescue thousands of Jews from Northern Transylvania and Hungary, where Jews were being arrested and deported. However, the circumstances of the Jews of Southern Transylvania changed in September 1944, soon after the Romanian army surrendered to the Soviets. The Hungarian army occupied an area along the northern border of Southern Transylvania. Most Jews fled the region, but the Hungarians murdered any they could find. The area was liberated that month, but when the Romanian army reoccupied most of Southern Transylvania, no Jews were left.

Wikipedia:

Transylvania

Top
Transylvania highlighted on a map of Romania, with the counties' boundaries. The light yellow areas correspond to the core territory of the historical Voivodeship. The regions marked in dark yellow, corresponding to Maramureş, Crişana and the Romanian Banat, are sometimes considered part of Transylvania.
Location of Transylvania (including Banat, Crişana and Maramureş) in Europe.

Transylvania (Romanian: Ardeal or Transilvania; Hungarian: Erdély; German: About this sound Siebenbürgen , see also other denominations) is a historical region in the central part of Romania. Bounded on the east and south by the Carpathian mountain range, historical Transylvania extended in the west to the Apuseni Mountains; however, the term frequently encompasses not only Transylvania proper, but also the historical regions of Crişana, Maramureş, and (Romanian) Banat.

Transylvania was once the nucleus of the Kingdom of Dacia (82 BC–106 AD). In 106 AD the Roman Empire conquered the territory and after that its wealth was systematically exploited. After the Roman legions withdrew in 271 AD, it was overrun by a succession of tribes, which subjected it to various influences. During this time areas of it were under the control of the Carpi (Dacian tribe), Visigoths, Huns, Gepids, Avars and Bulgars. Thereafter the Romanized Dacian inhabitants either moved into the mountains and preserved their culture or migrated southward. It is likely that elements of the mixed Daco–Roman population held out in Transylvania.[1] There is an ongoing scholarly debate over the population of Transylvania before the Hungarian conquest[2] (see Origin of the Romanians).

The Magyars conquered the area at the end of the 9th century and firmly established their control over it in 1003, when their king Stephen I, according to legend, defeated the native prince entitled or named Gyula.[3][4][5][6] Between 1003 and 1526, Transylvania was a voivodeship of the Kingdom of Hungary, led by a voivod appointed by the Hungarian King. After the Battle of Mohács in 1526 Transylvania became effectively an independent principality ruled primarily by Calvinist Hungarian princes. Afterward, in 1566, Hungary was divided between the Habsburgs and the Turks, with the Transylvanian principality maintaining autonomy as an Ottoman subject.

The Habsburgs acquired the territory shortly after the Battle of Vienna in 1683. The Habsburgs, however, recognized the Hungarian sovereignty over Transylvania,[1][dubious ] while the Transylvanians recognized the suzerainty of the Habsburg emperor Leopold I (1687), and the region was officially attached to the Habsburg Empire, separated in all but name[7][8] from Habsburg controlled Hungary[9][10][11] and subjected to the direct rule of the emperor’s governors.[12] In 1699 the Turks legally conceded their loss of Transylvania in the Treaty of Karlowitz; however, anti-Habsburg elements within the principality only submitted to the emperor in the 1711 Peace of Szatmár. After the Ausgleich of 1867 the region was fully reabsorbed into Hungary [4][6] as a part of the newly established Austro-Hungarian Empire.

Following defeat in World War I, Austria-Hungary began to disintegrate. The ethnic Romanian majority elected representatives, who then proclaimed union with Romania on December 1, 1918. The "Proclamation of Union" of Alba Iulia was adopted by the Deputies of the Romanians from Transylvania, and supported one month later by the vote of the Deputies of the Saxons from Transylvania. In 1920, the Allies confirmed the union in the Treaty of Trianon. Hungary protested against the detach, as over 1,600,000 Hungarian people[13] were living in the area in question, mainly in Szekler Land of Eastern Transylvania, and along the newly created border, which was drawn through areas with Hungarian majority. In August 1940, in the midst of World War II, Hungary regained about 40% of Transylvania by the Vienna Award, with the aid of Germany and Italy. The territory, however, reverted to Romania in 1945; this was confirmed in the 1947 Paris Peace Treaties[4].

In distant regions, Transylvania is also often associated with Dracula[14][15][16] (Bram Stoker's novel and its film adaptations), and the horror genre in general, while in countries of Central and Eastern Europe the region is known for the scenic beauty of its Carpathian landscape and its rich history.

Contents

Etymology

  • Transylvania was first referred to in a Medieval Latin document in 1075 as ultra silvam, meaning "beyond the forest" (ultra (+accusative) meaning "beyond" or "on the far side of" and the accusative case of sylva (sylvam) meaning "wood or forest"). Transylvania, with an alternative Latin prepositional prefix, means "on the other side of the woods". Hungarian historians claim that the Medieval Latin form Ultrasylvania, later Transylvania, was a direct translation from the Hungarian form Erdő-elve (not the Hungarian was derived from the Latin).[17]
  • The German name Siebenbürgen means "seven fortresses", after the seven (ethnic German) Transylvanian Saxons' cities in the region (Kronstadt, Schäßburg, Mediasch, Hermannstadt, Mühlbach, Bistritz and Klausenburg). This is also the origin of many other languages' names for the region, such as the Polish Siedmiogród.
  • The Hungarian form Erdély was first mentioned in the 12th century Gesta Hungarorum as "Erdeuleu".
  • The first known written occurrence of the Romanian name Ardeal appeared in a document in 1432 as Ardeliu.[18]

History

In its early history, the territory of Transylvania belonged to a variety of empires and states, including Dacia, the Roman Empire, the Hun Empire and the Gepid Kingdom.[19] There were also periods when autonomous political entities arose under the control of the Byzantine and the Bulgarian Empire[20].

In the 11th century Hungary took possession of Transylvania, a territory that probably had a mixed but basically Romanian population.[21] After the occupation the Hungarian crown encouraged immigration in order to strengthen against outside invasion. Most important was the settlement of the Szeklers and the Germans, who came in the 12th century. As a political entity, (Southern) Transylvania is mentioned from the 12th century as a county (Alba) of the Kingdom of Hungary (M. princeps ultrasilvanus - comes Bellegratae). Transylvania's seven counties were brought under the voivode's (count of Alba Iulia) rule in 1263. Although Transylvania was part of the Kingdom of Hungary, it retained wide autonomous privileges[22] and status[23] and after 1526 became a fully autonomous principality[23] under nominal Ottoman suzerainty.

A few centuries later, in 1688, it was added to the expanding territories of Habsburg Monarchy, then became again a part of the Kingdom of Hungary within the newly established Austro-Hungarian Empire in 1867. Since World War I, it has been part of Romania, apart from a brief period of Hungarian occupation during World War II.

Cluj-Napoca is today considered to be the region's spiritual capital, although Transylvania was also ruled from Alba Iulia during its period as an autonomous principality within the Ottoman Empire, and from Sibiu, where the Habsburg governor was located from 1711 to 1848. The seat of the Transylvanian Diet was itself moved to Sibiu for some time in the 19th century.

Since medieval times, the population of the region has been a mixture of ethnic Romanians (historically known as Vlachs), Hungarians, the ethnic Hungarian[24] Székely people, Germans (known as Saxons), Bulgarians (see Şchei, Şcheii Braşovului, Banat Bulgarians), Armenians (especially in Gherla (Armenopolis), Gheorgheni and Tarnaveni), Jews and Roma (known as Gypsies or "tatars" - Tatern in Transylvanian Saxon or tătăraşi in Romanian).

The Roman province of Dacia

The Kingdom of Dacia was in existence at least as early as the beginning of the 2nd century BC when, Rubobostes, a Dacian king from the territory of present-day Transylvania, undertook the control of the Carpathian basin by defeating the Celts who previously held the power in the region.

Transylvania within the Dacian Kingdom, during the rule of Burebista, 82 BC, stretching from the Black Sea to the Adriatic and from the Balkan Mountains to Bohemia.[25]

Dacia reached its maximum extent under the rule of Burebista. The area now constituting Transylvania was the political center of the ancient Kingdom of Dacia, where several important fortified cities were built; among them was the capital Sarmizegetusa, located near the current Romanian town of Hunedoara.

In 101-102 and 105-106 AD, Roman armies under the Emperor Trajan fought a series of military campaigns to subjugate the wealthy Dacian Kingdom. The Romans under Trajan succeeded by 106 to subdue the south and the center regions of Dacia. After the conquest, the Romans seized an enormous amount of wealth (the Dacian Wars were commemorated on Trajan's Column in Rome) and immediately started to exploit the Dacian gold and salt mines located in today territory of Transylvania. Roman influence was broadened by the construction of modern roads, and some existing major cities, like Sarmizegetusa and Dierna (today Orsova) were made colonies. The new province was divided under Hadrian: Dacia Superior, that corresponded roughly to Transylvania and Dacia Inferior, similar to the region of South Romania (Walachia)[citation needed]. During Antoninus Pius (138-161) the same territory was included in the provinces Dacia Porolissensis (capital at Porolissum) and Dacia Apulensis (capital at Apulum, today Alba-Iulia city in Romania). The Romans built new mines, roads and forts in the province. Colonists from other Roman provinces were brought in to settle the land and found cities like Apulum (now Alba Iulia), Napoca (now Cluj-Napoca), Ulpia Traiana Sarmizegetusa and Aquae. During the Roman administration also Christianity entered in the current territory of Transylvania from the neighboring Roman provinces where, according to the tradition of the Romanian Orthodox Church, St. Peter preached.

Due to increasing pressure from the Visigoths,[26] the Romans abandoned the province during the reign of the Emperor Aurelian in 271. As across much of Europe, a period of chaos and conquests followed after the collapse of Roman rule. However, as shown by the archeological research, many of the Roman cities continued to exist, building fortifications. Also Christianity survived as proved by the many artifacts discovered. Among the most famous is the donarium from Biertan (4th century) having the inscription 'Ego Zenovius votvm posui' (I, Zenovie, offered this). The territory fell under the control of the Visigoths and Carpians until they were in turn displaced and subdued by the Huns in 376, under the leadership of their infamous warlord Attila. After the disintegration of Attila's empire, the Huns were succeeded by Gepids of Eurasian Avar descent. The region was also influenced during this period by massive Slavic immigration.

At the beginning of the 9th century, Transylvania, along with eastern Pannonia, was under the control of the First Bulgarian Empire[citation needed]. After a brief period of Bulgarian rule, the territory, was partially under Byzantine control.

Conquest of Transylvania and integration into the Kingdom of Hungary

Based on primary sources

The presence of Romanians in Transylvania before the arrival of the Magyar tribes is mentioned in the Hungarian chronicle Gesta Hungarorum. According to this document, Transylvania was inhabited by Romanians/Vlachs and Slavs at the time of the Magyar conquest and was ruled by the Vlach prince Gelou. After Gelou was killed by the Hungarians in a battle near the River Someş, his subjects elected Tuhutum as their prince.[27]

Some historians consider the Gesta Hungarorum an unreliable source.[28] For example the author thought Kende had been the father of Kurszán.[29] In fact "kende" was a title of a Hungarian dignitary, probably the sacral ruler.[29] It is also worth mentioning that the Gesta was written about 300 years after the Hungarians entered Transylvania. The author of Gesta also talks about Cuman people at the time of the arrival of the Hungarians in Transylvania, though their first appearance in the ancient homeland of the Hungarians (between the Lower Danube and the Don) is dated to the eleventh century.[30]

The account of the Gesta Hungarorum is however repeated by Simon of Kéza who writes that the Vlachs remained after Attila left in Pannonia and Transylvania,[31] and also that the Székely were settled "among the Vlachs" (sed cum Blakis) in the mountains.[32] These words are repeated in the Chronicon Dubnicense, Chronicon Posoniense[33] Anna Komnenos also mentions "Dacians" (Vlachs) North of the Danube in her Alexiad.[34] Likewise, John Kinnamos writes in 1176 on the expedition of emperor Vatzates that there were Vlachs North of the Danube and that "it is said they are colonists arrived long ago from Italy."[35] These statements are repeated by all humanist authors like Antonio Bonfini[36] or Filip Callimachus[37] who state the Vlachs were descendants of the Roman colonists in Transylvania. With the exception of Istvan Szamoskozy, it was not until the late 18th century that any historian cast doubt on the continuity of the Romanians in Dacia.[38]

Based on Library of Congress

The Library of Congress in its country study about Romania: "Romanians descend from the Dacians, an ancient people who fell under Rome's dominance in the first century A.D., intermarried with Roman colonists, and adopted elements of Roman culture, including a Vulgar Latin that evolved into today's Romanian."[39]. However, according to the same source, when the Magyars arrived in the Pannonian Basin (896 ad), they met local population: "A century later their king, Stephen I, integrated Transylvania into his Hungarian kingdom. The Hungarians constructed fortresses, founded a Roman Catholic bishopric, and began proselytizing Transylvania's indigenous people. There is little doubt that these included some Romanians who remained faithful to the Eastern Orthodox Church after the East-West Schism."[40] Though, the US Library of Congress in its country study about Hungary simply points out that "Romanian and Hungarian historians disagree about the ethnicity of Transylvania's population before the Magyars' arrival [...]The Romanians assert that their Latin ancestors inhabited Transylvania and survived there through the Dark Ages [...] The Hungarians maintain that, when Hungarians conquered it in the 11th century, Transylvania was inhabited not by the ancestors of the Romanians but by Slavs".[2]

These facts have fueled a centuries-long feud between Romanian and Hungarian historians over Transylvania.[40]

The Romanian historians assert that their ancestors remained in Transylvania after Rome's exodus and that Romanians constitute the region's aboriginal inhabitants.<[39]

Hungarians assert, among other things, that the Roman population quit Dacia completely in 271, that the Romans could not have made a lasting impression on Transylvania's aboriginal population in only two centuries,[40] and that Transylvania's Romanians descended from Balkan nomads who crossed northward over the Danube in the thirteenth century and flowed into Transylvania in any significant numbers only after Hungary opened its borders to foreigners.[40] The Hungarians maintain that Transylvania was inhabited not by the ancestors of the Romanians but by Slavs and point out that the first mention of the Romanians' ancestors in Hungarian records, which appeared in the thirteenth century, described them as drifting herders.[2]

The Hungarian conquest according to Gesta Hungarorum

Map of Europe showing Transylvania as part of the Kingdom of Hungary (around 1097 AD)

At the beginning of the 9th century the Hungarian tribes were located in the north of the Black Sea. In 895 as a result of a planned 'conquest' and a massive withdrawal caused by a Bulgarian-Pecheneg attack they established in the Upper-Tisza region and Transylvania and started to expand their territories towards west only in 899. According to the Gesta Hungarorum describing among others the conquest of Transylvania, three statal structures ruled by[41] Menumorut, Glad and Gelu, the most powerful local leaders who opposed the Magyars[41] were encountered and defeated. The privileged position of these figures tended to put brakes on the normal exercise of Romanian critical historiography.[42]

Magyars in Transylvania (10-11th century)[43]

Gelou (Gelu in Romanian, Gyalu in Hungarian) Duke of the Vlachs[44] (ancient Romanians)[41] and Slavs[41] in Transylvania was ruling over the Middle part of Transylvania[41] and had his capital at Dabaca. He was defeated by the warriors of the Magyar chieftain Tétény (also called Töhötöm; in the original Latin: Tuhutum) sometime during the 10th century.

Glad (Bulgarian and Serbian Cyrillic: Глад) ruled over the South-West of Transylvania,[41] having authority over the Slavs and Vlachs, which consisted most of the population of mentioned regions at the time. He was, according to the Gesta Hungarorum, a voivod (duke) from Bundyn (Vidin), ruler of the territory of Banat, during the 9th and 10th centuries. He also ruled part of south Transylvania, and Vidin region, and was a local governor or vassal of the First Bulgarian Empire under Bulgarian tsar Simeon. Glad was defeated by the Hungarians during the 10th century.[41] One of his descendants, Ahtum, was a duke of Banat and the last ruler[41] who opposed the establishment of the Hungarian Kingdom in the 11th century, but he too was defeated by the Hungarian Crown.

Menumorut, a vassal of Byzantium[41] ruled the lands between the River Tisza and the Ygfon Forest[41] in the direction of Transylvania, from the Mureş river to the Someş river. He declined the request of the Magyar ruler Árpád (907) to cede his territory between the Someş river and the Meseş Mountains, and in the negotiations with the ambassadors Usubuu and Veluc of Árpád he invoked the sovereignty of the Byzantine Emperor Leo VI the Wise. The Magyars first besieged the citadel of Zotmar (Romanian: Satu Mare, Hungarian: Szatmár) and then Menumorut's castle in Bihar, and were able to defeat him. The Gesta Hungarorum then retells the story of Menumorut[41] . In the second telling, he married his daughter into the Árpád dynasty. Her son Taksony, the grandson of Menumorut[41] , became ruler of the Magyars and father of Mihály and Géza, whose son Vajk became the first King of Hungary in 1001 under the Christian baptismal name Stephen (István). The early 11th century was marked by the conflict between King Stephen I of Hungary and his uncle Gyula, the ruler of Transylvania. The Hungarian ruler was successful in these wars, and Transylvania was incorporated into the Christian Kingdom of Hungary. The Transylvanian Christian bishopric and the comitatus system were organised. By the early 11th century the ethnic Hungarian Székely were established in southeastern Transylvania[45] as a border population of ready warriors, and in the 12th and 13th centuries, the areas in the south and northeast were settled by German colonists called Saxons.[45] Romanians maintained control over a few autonomous regions called 'terrae': Fagaras, Amlas. Hateg, Maramures, Lapus. However, the autonomy was taken by the end of Árpád dynasty in 1301.

Medieval period

In 1241-1242, during the Mongol invasion of Europe, Transylvania was among the territories devastated by the Golden Horde. A large portion of the population perished. This was followed by a second Mongol invasion in 1285, led by Nogai Khan. To escape the deprecations, Wallachian (Romanian) settlers moved into the mountain fastness of the Carpathians.[1] The rulers of the Kingdom of Hungary established programs of colonization in eastern and southern Hungary. Saxon Germans, Szeklers, Slavs, and Wallachians settled in the peripheral areas which had suffered so greatly from the Mongol invasion.[1]

Diocesan division of Transylvania in the 13th century within the Kingdom of Hungary

Following this devastation, Transylvania was reorganized according to a class system of Estates, which established privileged groups (universitates) with power and influence in economic and political life, as well as along ethnic lines. The first Estate was the lay and ecclesiastic aristocracy, ethnically heterogeneous, but undergoing a process of homogenization around its Hungarian nucleus. The other Estates were Saxons, Szeklers and Romanians (or Vlachs - Universitas Valachorum), all with an ethnic and ethno-linguistic basis (Universis nobilibus, Saxonibus, Syculis et Olachis). The general assembly (congregatio generalis) of the four Estates had few genuine legislative powers in Transylvania, but it sometimes took measures regarding order in the country.

After the Decree of Turda (1366), which openly called for "to expel or to exterminate in this country malefactors belonging to any nation, especially Romanians" in Transylvania,[46] the only possibility for Romanians to retain or access nobility was through conversion to Roman Catholicism. Some Orthodox Romanian nobles converted, being integrated in the Hungarian nobility, but the most of them declined, thus losing their status and privileges.[47]

In some regions in the north (Maramureş) and south (Ţara Haţegului, Fagaras, Banat) where Romanians formed a majority of the population,[48] the Orthodox Romanian ruling class of nobilis kenezius (classed as lesser and middle nobility in the Kingdom as a whole) enjoyed a period of prosperity at the end of the 14th and the beginning of the 15th century, reflected in the reconstruction and decoration of some Orthodox churches. A Romanian archbishop is mentioned in 1377 in Transylvania; other Orthodox hierarchs were established in St. Michael's monastery at Feleac, near Cluj and Peri.[48] Nevertheless, because of the gradual loss of a nobility of its own, Romanians were no longer able to keep their Universitas Valachorum.

A key figure to emerge in Transylvania in the first half of the 15th century was John Hunyadi/János Hunyadi[49][50]/Iancu de Hunedoara, a native of Transylvania, born in a family of Romanian origins.[48] (According to the usage of Hungarian noblemen of the time, Iancu/John/János took his family name after his landed estate.[49]) He was one of the greatest military figures of the time, being Hungarian general, voivode of Transylvania[49] and then governor of the Kingdom of Hungary[48][49] from 1446 to 1452. He was a Transylvanian noble of Romanian origin[48] some sources indicating him as the son of Voicu/Vajk, a Romanian boyar from Wallachia[51] though other sources are telling that his father was a native Transylvanian .[52] Hungarian historians claim that his mother was Erzsébet Morzsinay the daughter of a Hungarian noble family.[53] His fame was built in the effective wars of defence against the Turkish attacks, waged from 1439. With his private mercenary army John rapidly rose to the heights of power. His military campaigns against the Ottoman Empire brought him the status of Transylvanian governor in 1446 and papal recognition as the Prince of Transylvania in 1448. Continuing his military activity, he won an important victory at Belgrade in 1456, which halted the Ottomans' advance for several decades, but died shortly afterwards during an epidemic.

After the suppression of the Budai Nagy Antal-revolt in 1437, the political system was based on Unio Trium Nationum (The Union of the Three Nations). According to the Union, which was explicitly directed against serfs and other peasants, society was ruled by three privileged Estates of the nobility (mostly ethnic Hungarians), the Székelys, also an ethnic Hungarian people who primarily served as warriors, and the ethnic German, Saxon burghers.

The only possibility for Romanians to retain or access nobility in Hungarian Transylvania was through conversion to Catholicism. Some Orthodox Romanian nobles converted, becoming integrated into the Hungarian nobility. These circumstances marked the beginning of a conflict between ethnic Hungarian Catholics and ethnic Romanian Orthodox (and ethnic Romanian Greek Catholics also) in the territory of Transylvania which in some regions remains unresolved to this very day.[54]

Transylvania as an independent principality

The Kingdom of Hungary was divided into three parts after the Battle of Mohács, (1526) which led to the formation of the Independent Principality     Transylvania

The 16th century in Southeastern Europe was marked by the struggle between the Muslim Ottoman Empire and the Catholic Habsburg Empire. After the Hungarian defeat at Mohacs, Hungary was divided between the Ottoman and Habsburg empires.[55]

Principality of Transylvania

Transylvania became an Ottoman vassal state, where native princes, who paid the Turks tribute, ruled with considerable autonomy.[55] Austrian and Turkish influences vied for supremacy for nearly two centuries. It is this period of independence and Turkish influence that contributed to Transylvania being seen as exotic in the eyes of Victorians such as Bram Stoker, whose novel Dracula was published in 1897.[56]

Michael the Brave entering Alba Iulia

Because Transylvania was now beyond the reach of Catholic religious authority, Protestant preaching such as Lutheranism and Calvinism were able to flourish in the region. In 1568 the Edict of Turda proclaimed four religious expressions in Transylvania - Latin Rite or Eastern Rite Catholicism, Lutheranism, Calvinism and Unitarianism (Unitarian Church of Transylvania), while Eastern Orthodoxy, which was the confession of almost the entire ethnic Romanian part of the population, was proclaimed as "tolerated" (tolerata).

The three principalities were united under Romanian rule from 1599 to 1600

The Báthory, a Hungarian noble family, began to rule Transylvania as princes under the Ottomans in 1571, and briefly under Habsburg suzerainty until 1600. The latter period of their rule saw a four-sided conflict in Transylvania involving the Transylvanian Báthorys, the emerging Austrian Empire, the Ottoman Empire, and the Romanian voivoideship (province) of Wallachia. This included a one year period of Romanian rule after the conquest of the territory by Wallachian voivod Michael the Brave. As he subsequently extended his rule over Moldavia, Michael the Brave unified all the territories where Romanians lived, rebuilding the mainland of the ancient Kingdom of Dacia[57]

The Calvinist magnate of Bihar county Stephen Bocskai managed to obtain, through the Peace of Vienna (June 23, 1606), religious liberty and political autonomy for the region, the restoration of all confiscated estates, the repeal of all "unrighteous" judgments, as well as his own recognition as independent sovereign prince of an enlarged Transylvania. Under Bocskai's successors, most notably Gabriel Bethlen and George I Rákóczi, Transylvania passed through a golden age for many religious movements and for the arts and culture. Transylvania became one of the few European States where Roman Catholics, Calvinists, Lutherans and Unitarians lived in peace, although Orthodox Romanians continued to be denied equal recognition.

This golden age and relative independence of Transylvania ended with the reign of George II Rákóczi. The prince, coveting the Polish crown, allied with Sweden and invaded Poland in spite of the Turkish Porte clearly prohibiting any military action. Rákóczi's defeat in Poland, combined with the subsequent invasions of Transylvania by the Turks and their Crimean Tatar allies, the ensuing loss of territory (most importantly, the loss of the most important Transylvanian stronghold, Oradea) and diminishing manpower led to the complete subordination of Transylvania, which now became a powerless vassal of the Ottoman Empire.

Within the Habsburg Empire

After the defeat of the Ottomans at the Battle of Vienna in 1683, the Habsburgs gradually began to impose their rule on the formerly autonomous Transylvania. Apart from strengthening the central government and administration, the Habsburgs also promoted the Roman Catholic Church, both as a uniting force and also as an instrument to reduce the influence of the Protestant nobility. In addition, they tried to persuade Romanian Orthodox clergymen to join the Greek (Byzantine Rite) Catholic Church in union with Rome. As a response to this policy, several peaceful movements of the Romanian Orthodox population advocated for freedom of worship for all the Transylvanian population, most notably being the movements led by Visarion Sarai, Nicolae Oprea Miclăuş and Sofronie of Cioara. Additional Germans settled in the principality under official colonization schemes and a large number of Romanians, fleeing the Turkish rule in their own principalities, also moved in to occupy vacant lands.[1]

The Transylvanian Principality in 1857
Administrative map of Hungary, Galicia and Transylvania in 1862

From 1711 onward, the princes of Transylvania were replaced with imperial governors[8][12] and in 1765 Transylvania was declared a Grand Principality, further consolidating its special separate status within the Habsburg Empire established by the Diploma Leopoldinum in 1691.[11] The Hungarian historiography sees this as a mere formality.[58][59] Within the Habsburg-controlled Kingdom of Hungary there was a separate administrative Hungary and Transylvania.

The revolutionary year 1848 was marked by a great struggle between the Hungarians, the Romanians and the Habsburg Empire. The Hungarians promised for Romanians the abolition of serfdom for their support against Austria.[45] The Romanians rejected the offer and instead rose against the Hungarian national state.[45] Warfare erupted in November with both Romanian and Saxon troops, under Austrian command, battling the Hungarians led by the Polish born general Józef Bem in Transylvania. He carried out a sweeping offensive through Transylvania,[citation needed] and Avram Iancu managed to retreat to the harsh terrain of the Apuseni Mountains, mounting a guerrilla campaign on Bem's forces. After the intervention by the armies of Tsar Nicholas I of Russia, Bem's army was defeated decisively at the Battle of Timişoara (Temesvár, Hun.) on 9 August 1849.

Having quashed the revolution, Austria imposed a repressive regime on Hungary, ruled Transylvania directly through a military governor and granted citizenship to the Romanians.[citation needed]

The 300-year long special separate status came to an end by the Austro-Hungarian Compromise of 1867, which established the dual monarchy and reincorporated Transylvania into Hungary. On 20 June 1867, the Diet was dissolved by royal decree, and an ordinance abrogated the legislative acts of the Cluj-Napoca provincial assembly. The department of the interior inherited the responsibilities of the Transylvanian Gubernium, and the government reserved the right to name Transylvania's royal magistrates as well as the Saxon bailiff of the Universitas Saxorum. Hungarian legislation also came to supersede the Austrian code of civil procedure, penal law, commercial law, and regulations for bills of exchange.

The new unity of Austria-Hungary created a process Magyarization affecting Transylvania's Romanians[60] and German Saxons.[61] After the Ausgleich of 1867, when an autonomous government for the Kingdom of Hungary was formed within Austria-Hungary, the importance of Transylvania as a core territory was once again illustrated when Hungarian leaders successfully demanded and secured Transylvania's return to the Hungarian Kingdom. By the 1890s, the Hungarians government began implementing vigurous Magyarization policies in an attempt to integrate the territories of the Hungarian Kingdom. Those Magyarization policies were primarily directed at Transylvania.[62] In an important sense, Transylvania was the historical breeding ground of Hungarian romantic nationalism. Its Magyar-led anti-Hapsburg struggles preceded the popular nationalism that emerged among the Pannonian Magyars in the early nineteenth century. Even after the revolution of 1848 and the 1867 Ausgleich separating Austria from Hungary, Transylvanian aristocrats continued to exert a high degree of power since Hungary adopted what some historians call an official nationalism.[63]

The signers of the Transylvanian Memorandum

Although Romanians formed the majority of Transylvania's population (59%), they had not been awarded legal status as a nation. In 1892 the leaders of the Romanians of Transylvania sent a Memorandum to the Austro-Hungarian Emperor-King Franz Joseph, asking for equal ethnic rights with the Hungarians, and demanding an end to persecutions and Magyarization attempts. Franz Josef forwarded the memorandum to Budapest, and the authors were tried for "homeland betrayal" in May 1894, being sentenced to long prison terms.

Part of Romania

The National Assembly in Alba Iulia (December 1, 1918)

As Austria-Hungary disintegrated at the end of World War I, the nationalities living there proclaimed their independence from the empire. The 1228-member National Assembly of Romanians of Transylvania and Hungary, headed by leaders of Transylvania's Romanian National Party and Social Democratic Party, passed a resolution calling for unification of all Romanians in a single state on 1 December in Alba Iulia.[64] This was approved by the National Council of the Germans from Transylvania and the Council of the Danube Swabians from the Banat, on 15 December in Mediaş. In response, the Hungarian General Assembly of Cluj reaffirmed the loyalty of Hungarians from Transylvania to Hungary on December 22, 1918. (See also: Union of Transylvania with Romania) The Treaty of Versailles placed Transylvania under the sovereignty of Romania, an ally of the Triple Entente, and the Treaty of St. Germain (1919) and the Treaty of Trianon (signed in June 1920) further elaborated the status of Transylvania and defined the new border between the states of Hungary and Romania.[65][66] King Ferdinand I of Romania and Queen Maria of Romania were crowned at Alba Iulia in 1922 as King and Queen of all Romania.

Greater Romania Historical Provinces after WWI

The new regime's objective became to effectively Romanianize Transylvania in a social-political fashion, after centuries of Hungarian rule.[67] The regime's goal was to create a Romanian middle and upper class that would assume power in all fields. The Hungarian language was expunged from official life that it solely occupied before, and all place-names were Romanianized.[68] About 197,000 Transylvanian Hungarians fled to Hungary between 1918 and 1922,[69] and a further group of 169,000 emigrated over the remainder of the interwar period.[68] In 1930, Romanians formed the majority of the Transylvanian population (58.2%, up from 53.8% in 1910), while Magyars (26.7%, down from 31.6% in 1910), Germans (9.8%) and Jews (3.2%) were minority groups.[70] The expropriation of the estates of Magyar magnates, the distribution of the lands to the Romanian peasants, and the policy of cultural Romanianization that followed were major causes of friction between Hungary and Romania.[45]

In August 1940, the second Vienna Award granted the northern half of Transylvania to Hungary. After the Treaty of Paris (1947), at the end of World War II, the territory was returned to Romania. The post-WWII borders with Hungary, agreed on at the Treaty of Paris, were identical with those set out in 1920.

After World War II and especially after the fall of Communism, Transylvania lost almost all of the German-speaking population, most of them left for Germany.

After the Romanian Revolution of 1989, a Hungarian minority group is pressing for greater autonomy in the Szekler Region (the counties of Harghita and Covasna and part of Mures County) where its members outnumber Romanians.[71][72] There have been tensions in Transylvania between Romanians and ethnic Hungarians who want autonomy.[72][73] The Hungarians said they were the target of attacks by Romanian politicians and news organizations.[73] They say the aim is to forcibly assimilate the Hungarian minority of 1.43 million people, or 6.6% the Romanian population. Romanians chided the Hungarians for refusing to integrate and in some cases for their ignorance of the Romanian language.[73]

In 1996 Romania and Hungary signed a Basic Treaty on Understanding, Cooperation, and Good-Neighborliness, one of the aims being protection and development of ethnic, cultural, linguistic and religious identity of the Hungarian minority in Romania and the Romanian minority in Hungary[74] receiving good feedback from US and EU members in the context of NATO enlargement.[75][76]

Hungarian minority in Transylvania

In 2003, the Szekler National Council was founded - a local Hungarian group with autonomy as its stated goal.[72] Unlike the Kosovars, the Szeklers are asking for autonomy within Romania rather than complete independence, leaving foreign policy and national defense in the hands of the government in Bucharest.[72]

A new and more radical organization, the Hungarian Civic Party, has risen to challenge the establishment Hungarian party and has advocated for the autonomy of the Szekler region.[72] The Hungarian politician, László Tőkés, one of the party leaders, is pressing for greater autonomy, saying that Romanian and Hungarian authorities have to reach an agreement regarding the statute of the Hungarian community, the Szeckler county respectively.[77]

However, relations between Romania and Hungary have improved significantly.[78] The governments of Hungary and Romania held their second annual joint session in 2006. The main objective is convergence of Hungarian and Romanian National Development Plans. In particular they are keen to increase co-operation aimed at improving their absorption capacity of EU funds and to ensure development in line with EU standards. The two countries are also working closely on policies to promote the welfare of ethnic Romanians living in Hungary and ethnic Magyar (Hungarians) in Romania.[78]

Geography and ethnography

Romanian ethnographic regions (Transylvania-red; Maramureş-blue; Sǎtmar-green; Crişana-yellow; Banat-purple)
Hungarian ethnographic regions (King's Pass - yellow; Western Transylvania - green; Eastern Transylvania - blue)

The Transylvanian plateau, 300 to 500 metres (1,000-1,600 feet) high, is drained by the Mureş, Someş, Criş, and Olt rivers, as well as other tributaries of the Danube. This core of historical Transylvania roughly corresponds with nine counties of modern Romania. Other areas to the west and north, which also united with Romania in 1918 (inside the border established by peace treaties in 1919-20), are since that time widely considered part of Transylvania.

See also Administrative divisions of the Kingdom of Hungary. In common reference, the Western border of Transylvania has come to be identified with the present Romanian-Hungarian border, settled in the Treaty of Trianon, although geographically the two are not identical.

Administrative divisions

The historical region granted to Romania in 1920 covered 23 counties including nearly 102,200 km² (102,787 - 103,093 in Hungarian sources and 102,200 in contemporary Romanian documents) now due to the several administrative reorganisations Transylvania covers 16 present-day counties (Romanian: judeţ) which include nearly 99,837 km² of central and northwest Romania. The 16 counties are:

The most populous cities are:

Population

Historical definitions of Transylvania vary geographically. The 2002 Romanian census classified Transylvania as the entire region of Romania west of the Carpathians. This region has a population of 7,221,733, with a large Romanian majority (75.9%). There are also sizeable Hungarian (20%), Roma (3.3%), German (0.7%) and Serb (0.1%) communities.[79][80] The ethnic Hungarian population of Transylvania, largely composed of Székely, form a majority in the counties of Covasna and Harghita.

Population in Tranylvania at the time of the Treaty of Trianon.

The percentage of Romanian majority has increased since the union of Transylvania with Romania after World War I in 1918 (the 1910 Census indicates a total population of 5,262,495, Romanians 53.8%; Hungarians 31.6%; Germans 10.7%), it should be noted however that the number of Hungarians grew at twice the rate of the overall population, mostly due to pre-WWI policies of Magyarization.[81]

The expropriation of the estates of Magyar magnates, the distribution of the lands to the Romanian peasants, and the policy of cultural Romanianization that followed the Treaty of Trianon were major causes of friction between Hungary and Romania.[82] Other factors include the emigration of non-Romanian peoples, assimilation and internal migration within Romania (estimates show that between 1945 and 1977, some 630,000 people moved from the Old Kingdom to Transylvania, and 280,000 from Transylvania to the Old Kingdom, most notably to Bucharest).[83]

Economy

Transylvania is rich in mineral resources, notably lignite, iron, lead, manganese, gold, copper, natural gas, salt and sulfur.

There are large iron and steel, chemical, and textile industries. Stock raising, agriculture, wine production and fruit growing are important occupations. Timber is another valuable resource.

Transylvania accounts for around 35% of Romania's GDP, and has a GDP per capita (PPP) of around $11,500, around 10% higher than the Romanian average.

Tourist attractions

Historical coat of arms of Transylvania

The historical arms of Transylvania (1659).

The first heraldic representations of Transylvania date from the 16th century. One of the predominant early symbols of Transylvania was the coat of arms of Sibiu city. In 1596 Levinus Hulsius created a coat of arms for the imperial province of Transylvania, consisting of a shield party per fess, with a rising eagle in the upper field and seven hills with towers on top in the lower field. He published it in his work "Chronologia", issued in Nurnberg the same year. The seal from 1597 of Sigismund Bathory, prince of Transylvania, reproduced the new coat of arms with some slight changes: in the upper field the eagle was flanked by a sun and a moon and in the lower field the hills were replaced by simple towers.[87]

The seal of Michael the Brave from 1600 depicts the territory of the former Dacian kingdom: Wallachia, Moldavia and Transylvania:[88]

  • The black eagle (Wallachia)
  • The aurochs's head (Moldavia)
  • The seven hills (Transylvania).
  • Over the hills there were two rampant lions affrotns, supporting the trunk of a tree, as a symbol of the reunited Dacian kingdom.[88]

The Diet of 1659 codified the representation of the privileged nations in Transylvania's coat of arms. It depicted a black turul on a blue background, representing the nobility, a Sun and the Moon representing the Székelys, and seven red towers on a yellow background representing the seven fortified cities of the Transylvanian Saxons. The red dividing band was originally not part of the coat of arms.

Currently, unlike the counties included in it, the region of Transylvania does not have its own official coat of arms. Nonetheless, the historical coat of arms is currently present in the coat of arms of Romania, alongside the traditional coats of arms of the rest of Romanian's historical regions.

Gallery

Transylvania in fiction

Following the publication of Emily Gerard's The Land Beyond the Forest (1888), Bram Stoker wrote his gothic horror novel Dracula in 1897, using Transylvania as a setting. Due to the success of the latter work, Transylvania became associated in the English-speaking world with vampires. Since then it has been represented in fiction and literature as a land of mystery and magic. For example, in Paulo Coelho's novel The Witch of Portobello, the main character, Sherine Khalil, is described as a Transylvanian orphan with a Romani mother, in an effort to add to the character's exotic mystique. The so-called Transylvanian trilogy of historical novels by Miklos Banffy, The Writing on the Wall, is an extended treatment of the 19th and early 20th century social and political history of the country.

References

  1. ^ a b c d e "International Boundary Study - No. 47 – April 15, 1965 - Hungary – Romania (Rumania) Boundary". US Bureau of Intelligence and Research. http://www.law.fsu.edu/library/collection/LimitsinSeas/IBS047.pdf. 
  2. ^ a b c "Early history". A Country Study: Hungary. Federal Research Division, Library of Congress. http://memory.loc.gov/frd/cs/hutoc.html. Retrieved 2008-12-02. 
  3. ^ Gyula - it is possible that during the 10th century some of the holders of the title of gyula also used Gyula as a personal name, but the issue has been confused because the chronicler of one of the most important primary sources (the Gesta Hungarorum) has been shown to have used titles or even names of places as personal names in some cases.
  4. ^ a b c "Transylvania". Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc.. 2008. http://britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/603323/Transylvania. Retrieved 2008-08-01. 
  5. ^ Engel, Pal; Andrew Ayton (2005). The Realm of St Stephen. London: Tauris. p. 27. ISBN 185043977X. http://books.google.com/books?id=vEJNBqanT_8C&pg=PA27. 
  6. ^ a b "Transylvania," Microsoft® Encarta® Online Encyclopedia 2008 http://encarta.msn.com © 1997-2008 Microsoft Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
  7. ^ http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/1459175/Diploma-Leopoldinum
  8. ^ a b http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/603323/Transylvania
  9. ^ Peter F. Sugar. Southeastern Europe Under Ottoman Rule, 1354-1804 (History of East Central Europe), University of Washington Press, July 1983, page 163, http://books.google.com/books?id=LOln4TGdDHYC&pg=PA163&dq=independent+principality+that+was+not+reunited+with+Hungary&lr=
  10. ^ John F. Cadzow, Andrew Ludanyi, Louis J. Elteto, Transylvania: The Roots of Ethnic Conflict, Kent State University Press, 1983, page 79, http://books.google.com/books?id=fX5pAAAAMAAJ&q=diploma+leopoldinum+transylvania&dq=diploma+leopoldinum+transylvania&lr=&pgis=1
  11. ^ a b Paul Lendvai, Ann Major. “The Hungarians: A Thousand Years of Victory in Defeat” C. Hurst & Co. Publishers, 2003, page 146; http://books.google.com/books?id=9yCmAQGTW28C&pg=PA146&dq=diploma+leopoldinum+transylvania&lr=
  12. ^ a b http://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Grand+Principality+of+Transylvania
  13. ^ (in Hungarian) Történelmi világatlasz [World Atlas of History]. Cartographia. 1998. ISBN 9633525195CM. 
  14. ^ Transylvania Society of Dracula Information
  15. ^ Travel Advisory Lure of Dracula In Transylvania - New York Times
  16. ^ Romania Transylvania
  17. ^ Engel, Pál (2001). Realm of St. Stephen: History of Medieval Hungary, 895–1526 (International Library of Historical Studies), page 24, London: I.B. Taurus. ISBN 1-86064-061-3
  18. ^ Pascu, Ştefan (1972), Voievodatul Transilvaniei, I, pp. 22 
  19. ^ Béla Köpeczi (editor). "History of Transylvania". Atlantic Research and Publications, Inc.. http://mek.oszk.hu/03400/03407/html/33.html. Retrieved 2007-01-29. 
  20. ^ 6. SOUTHERN TRANSYLVANIA UNDER BULGAR RULE
  21. ^ Barbara Jelavich. "History of the Balkans: Eighteenth and nineteenth centuries". Cambridge University Press, 1983 ISBN 0521274583, 9780521274586. p. 20. http://books.google.ro/books?id=qR4EeOrTm-0C&pg=PA20&dq=Transylvania+a+territory+that+probably+had+a+mixed+but+basically+Romanian&lr=&as_brr=3. 
  22. ^ Barbara Jelavich (1983). History of the Balkans: Eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. Cambridge University Press. p. 21. ISBN 0521274583. http://books.google.ro/books?id=qR4EeOrTm-0C&pg=PA20&dq=Transylvania+a+territory+that+probably+had+a+mixed+but+basically+Romanian&lr=&as_brr=3. 
  23. ^ a b Bernard A. Cook (10 January 2001). Europe Since 1945: An Encyclopedia (1st ed.). Routledge. ISBN 978-0815313366. http://books.google.com/books?id=hafLHZgZtt4C&pg=PA1259&dq=Transylvania+%22autonomous+status+within%22&lr=. 
  24. ^ "Szekler". Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc.. 2008. http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/579333/Szekler. Retrieved 2008-06-30. 
  25. ^ "Britannica Encyclopedia, History of Romania - Antiquity - The Dacians". http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/508461/Romania/214504/History#ref=ref476941. 
  26. ^ Encyclopædia Britannica, Eleventh Edition
  27. ^ Pal Engel, Tamas Palosfalvi, Andrew Ayton (2005). "The Last Arpadians". The Realm of St Stephen: A History of Medieval Hungary, 895-1526. Central European University Press. p. 117. ISBN 9639116971. http://books.google.com/books?id=vEJNBqanT_8C&pg=PA117&dq=Transylvania+Vlachs&lr=#PPA117,M1. Retrieved 2008-11-28. 
  28. ^ Magocsi, Paul Robert (1978). The Shaping of a National Identity: Subcarpathian Rus', 1848-1948.. Harvard University Press. pp. 107. ISBN 0-674-80579-8. 
  29. ^ a b Kézai Simon; László Veszprémy, Frank Schaer, Jenő Szűcs (1999). Gesta Hungarorum. Central European University Press. pp. 84. ISBN 9639116319. http://books.google.com/books?id=a72xT1YubqAC&pg=PA84. 
  30. ^ Engel, Pal; Tamas Palosfalvi, Andrew Ayton (2005). The Realm of St Stephen: A History of Medieval Hungary, 895-1526. I.B.Tauris. pp. 90. ISBN 185043977X. http://books.google.com/books?id=vEJNBqanT_8C&pg=PA90. 
  31. ^ I. A. POP, Românii si maghiarii în secolele IX-XIV. Geneza statului medieval în Transilvania, Cluj-Napoca, 1996
  32. ^ Elemér, Illyés (1992). Ethnic Continuity in the Carpatho-Danubian Area. Hunyadi OCS. pp. 90. ISBN 0880331461. 
  33. ^ Armbruster, Adolf. Romanitatea Romanilor, Chapter 2.2
  34. ^ Komnenos, Anna. Alexiad. Book III. Pp. 87-88.
  35. ^ loannes Cinnamus, Epitome rerum ab Ioanne et Alexio Comnenis gestarum, VI, ed. Bonn. p. 260 Latin: Qui Italorum coloni quondam fuisse perhibentur
  36. ^ A. Bonfinius, Rerum Ungaricarum decades qvatvor cvm dimidia, Basileae, 1568. II, lib. 7, ed. cit., p. 304-305
  37. ^ Ph. Callimachus, Vita et mores Sbignei cardinalis, ed. Irmina Lichonska, Varsoviae, 1962, p. 26
  38. ^ >Georgescu, Vlad (1992). The Romanians: A History. Ohio State University Press. pp. 318. 
  39. ^ a b A Country Study: Romania. Federal Research Division, Library of Congress. http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/r?frd/cstdy:@field(DOCID+ro0011). 
  40. ^ a b c d "The Magyars' Arrival in Transylvania". A Country Study: Romania. Federal Research Division, Library of Congress. http://lcweb2.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/r?frd/cstdy:@field(DOCID+ro0017). Retrieved 2008-12-01. 
  41. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Matei Cazacu. "Transylvania". in Andre Vauchez, Richard Barrie Dobson, Adrian Walford, Michael Lapidge. Encyclopedia of the Middle Ages. p. 1457. http://books.google.hu/books?id=om4olQhrE84C&printsec=frontcover&dq=gelou+transylvania&lr=&hl=ro&source=gbs_summary_r&cad=0#PPA1457,M1. Retrieved 2008-07-31. 
  42. ^ Boia, Lucian (2001). "The Romanian state during the "Dark Millennium"". History and Myth in Romanian Consciousness. Central European University Press. p. 222. ISBN 9639116971. http://books.google.hu/books?id=RM6MRPWXxQYC&printsec=frontcover#PPA125,M1. Retrieved 2008-08-01. 
  43. ^ Bóna, István; Translation by Péter Szaffkó (2001). The Settlement of Transylvania in the 10th and 11th Centuries. Columbia University Press, New York,. ISBN 0-88033-479-7. http://mek.niif.hu/03400/03407/html/54.html. 
  44. ^ Anonymous notary of King Bela, translation by Martyn Rady. "Gesta Hungarorum - Deeds of the Hungarians". http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&ct=res&cd=11&ved=0CAcQFjAAOAo&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ssees.ucl.ac.uk%2Fprospect%2FGestaHungarorum.pdf&ei=nYVYS68xh6qaA76D8ZAD&usg=AFQjCNERBePyFztb_o3wFz04NQR0rjHjAg. Retrieved 2010-01-21. 
  45. ^ a b c d e The Columbia Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition. Transylvania. Columbia University Press. 2007. http://www.bartleby.com/65/tr/Transylv.html. Retrieved 2009.05.21.. 
  46. ^ I. Dani, K. Gündish et al. (eds.) Documenta Romaniae Historica, vol. XIII, Transilvania (1366-1370), Editura Academiei Române, Bucharest 1994, p. 161-162
  47. ^ Pop I.-A., Nations and Denominations in Transylvania (13th - 16th Century) In Tolerance and Intolerance in Historical Perspective, edited by Csaba Lévai et al., Edizioni PLUS, Università di Pisa, 2003, p. 111 – 125
  48. ^ a b c d e Matei cazacu. "Transylvania". in Andre Vauchez, Richard Barrie Dobson, Adrian Walford, Michael Lapidge. Encyclopedia of the Middle Ages. Routledge, 2000 ISBN 1579582826, 9781579582821. http://books.google.ro/books?id=om4olQhrE84C&pg=PA1458&dq=maramures+nobility&lr=&as_brr=3&as_pt=ALLTYPES. 
  49. ^ a b c d "János Hunyadi". Encyclopædia Britannica Inc.. 2008. http://britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/277182/Janos-Hunyadi. Retrieved 2008-07-31. 
  50. ^ "János Hunyadi". Encarta. 2008. http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761557950/Janos_Hunyadi.html. Retrieved 2008-08-01. 
  51. ^ Enea Silvius Piccolomini, (Pope Pius II), In Europa - Historia Austrialis, BAV, URB, LAT. 405, ff.245, IIII kal. Aprilis MCCCCLVIII, Ex Urbe Roma
  52. ^ "Jean W. Sedlar, East Central Europe in the Middle Ages, 1000-1500, University of Washington Press, 1994". http://books.google.hu/books?id=ANdbpi1WAIQC&pg=PA41&dq=%22Transylvanian+Vlach%22&hl=ro&sig=ACfU3U3Y-_A50x6WX4HqGLL-fyfHUI-4oA. Retrieved 2008-07-31. 
  53. ^ "A Hunyadiaktól karácsonyig" (in Hungarian). Zoltán Balassa. http://web.axelero.hu/kesz/jel/01_12/hunyadiak.htm#10. Retrieved 2008-04-25. 
  54. ^ Romania Confronts Transylvanian Separatism
  55. ^ a b A Country Study: Hungary. Federal Research Division, Library of Congress. http://lcweb2.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/r?frd/cstdy:@field(DOCID+hu0021). Retrieved 2009-01-11. 
  56. ^ ELENI COUNDOURIOTIS, Dracula and the Idea of Europe
  57. ^ Rezachevici, Constantin, Mihai Viteazul et la "Dacie" de Sigismund Báthory en 1595, Ed. Argessis, 2003, 12, p.155-164
  58. ^ "JOHN HUNYADI: Hungary in American History Textbooks". Andrew L. Simon. Corvinus LIbrary Hungarian History. http://www.hungarian-history.hu/lib/hunyadi/hu03.htm. Retrieved 7 July 2009. 
  59. ^ The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia® Copyright © 2007, Columbia University Press. Licensed from Columbia University Press. All rights reserved. www.cc.columbia.edu/cu/cup/[1]
  60. ^ Robert Bideleux and Ian Jeffries, A History of Eastern Europe: Crisis and Change, Routledge, 1998. ISBN 0-415-16111-8 hardback, ISBN 0-415-16112-6 paper, p. 368–375.
  61. ^ Barbara Jelavich. "History of the Balkans". http://books.google.com/books?id=Hd-or3qtqrsC&pg=PA72&dq=Transylvania+Magyarization+saxons&lr=. 
  62. ^ George W. White, Nationalism and territory, p. 99
  63. ^ Brett Neilson, Free trade in the Bermuda Triangle and other tales of counterglobalization, 2003, p.63
  64. ^ "December 1 - Romania National Day". Honorary Consul of Romania in Boston. http://www.roconsulboston.com/Pages/InfoPages/History/December1.html. Retrieved 2008-01-12. 
  65. ^ Bachman, Robert D. (1989). "Romania: A Country Study". http://countrystudies.us/romania/20.htm. Retrieved 2008-01-12. 
  66. ^ "Trianon, Treaty of". Encyclopædia Britannica. http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9073332/Treaty-of-Trianon. Retrieved 2008-01-12. 
  67. ^ Bugajski, Janusz (1995). Ethnic Politics in Eastern Europe: A Guide to Nationality Policies, Organizations, and Parties. M.E. Sharpe (Washington, D.C.). ISBN 1563242834, 9781563242830. 
  68. ^ a b Kovrig, Bennett (2000), Partitioned nation: Hungarian minorities in Central Europe, in: Michael Mandelbaum (ed.), The new European Diasporas: National Minorities and Conflict in Eastern Europe, New York: Council on Foreign Relations Press, pp. 19-80.
  69. ^ Raffay Ernő: A vajdaságoktól a birodalomig. Az újkori Románia története (From voivodeships to the empire. The modern history of Romania). Publishing house JATE Kiadó, Szeged, 1989, pp. 155-156)
  70. ^ Livezeanu, Irina (2000). Cultural Politics in Greater Romania. Cornell University Press. pp. 135. ISBN 0801486882, 9780801486883. 
  71. ^ "BREAKAWAY ROLE MODEL - Romania: The Magyars in Székely Land". Der Spiegel. 2008-02-22. http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/0,1518,537008-2,00.html. Retrieved 2008-07-29. 
  72. ^ a b c d e "Kosovo’s Actions Hearten a Hungarian Enclave". The New York Times. 2008-04-07. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/07/world/europe/07hungarians.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=Szekler&st=nyt&oref=slogin. Retrieved 2008-06-30. 
  73. ^ a b c "Hungarians and Romanians At Odds in Transylvania". The New York Times. 1997-12-26. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C02E4DB1E3EF935A15751C1A961958260. Retrieved 2008-08-01. 
  74. ^ "TREATY between the Republic of Hungary and Romania on Understanding, Cooperation and Good Neighbourhood". http://hungaryemb.ines.ro/en/tratat.html. 
  75. ^ "U.S. Department Of State, Press Statement:Romania and Hungary Sign Treaty". http://dosfan.lib.uic.edu/ERC/briefing/press_statements/9609/960916ps1.html. 
  76. ^ "UK House Of Commons praises the Treaty between Romania and Hungary". http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm199697/cmhansrd/vo961101/text/61101w13.htm. 
  77. ^ "Magyar Autonomy, An Issue Romania Needs To Deal With". Mediafax. http://www.mediafax.ro/engleza/magyar-autonomy-an-issue-romania-needs-to-deal-with-official.html?6966;2411796. Retrieved 2008-02-24. 
  78. ^ a b "Foreign and Commonwealth Office, Romania, Country profile". http://www.fco.gov.uk/en/about-the-fco/country-profiles/europe/romania?profile=intRelations&pg=4. 
  79. ^ 2002 Census official results
  80. ^ Ethnocultural Diversity Resource Centre database
  81. ^ Varga, E. Árpád, Hungarians in Transylvania between 1870 and 1995, Translation by Tamás Sályi, Budapest, March 1999 , p. 27
  82. ^ "Transylvania". Columbia Encyclopedia. http://www.bartleby.com/65/tr/Transylv.html. Retrieved 2008-11-18. 
  83. ^ Varga, E. Árpád, Hungarians in Transylvania between 1870 and 1995, Translation by Tamás Sályi, Budapest, March 1999 , p. 31
  84. ^ http://www.romanianmonasteries.org/other-monasteries/densus
  85. ^ http://sibiupeople.ro/en/reports/732
  86. ^ a b http://www.itsromania.com/apuseni-caves.html
  87. ^ Dan Cernovodeanu, Ştiinţa şi arta heraldică în România, Bucharest, 1977, p. 130
  88. ^ a b "Coat of arms of Dacia (medieval)". http://www.fotw.net/flags/ro-dacia.html. 

Further reading

External links


 
 

 

Copyrights:

Dictionary. The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition Copyright © 2007, 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Updated in 2007. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.  Read more
Britannica Concise Encyclopedia. Britannica Concise Encyclopedia. © 1994-2009 Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. All rights reserved.  Read more
Columbia Encyclopedia. The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition Copyright © 2003, Columbia University Press. Licensed from Columbia University Press. All rights reserved. www.cc.columbia.edu/cu/cup/ Read more
The Vampire Book. The Vampire Book. 1999 ©Visible Ink Press. All rights reserved.  Read more
Holocaust. Encyclopedia of the Holocaust. Copyright © H.H. The Jerusalem Publishing House, Ltd. © Yad Vashem, the Holocaust Martyrs' and Heroes' Remembrance Authority. All rights reserved.  Read more
Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Transylvania" Read more

 

Mentioned in