Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Email
Answers.com

Universal Plug and Play

 
Wikipedia: Universal Plug and Play

Universal Plug and Play (UPnP) is a set of networking protocols promulgated by the UPnP Forum. The goals of UPnP are to allow devices to connect seamlessly and to simplify the implementation of networks in the home (data sharing, communications, and entertainment) and in corporate environments for simplified installation of computer components. UPnP achieves this by defining and publishing UPnP device control protocols (DCP) built upon open, Internet-based communication standards.

The term UPnP is derived from plug-and-play, a technology for dynamically attaching devices directly to a computer, although UPnP is not directly related to the earlier plug-and-play technology. UPnP devices are "plug-and-play" in that when connected to a network they automatically announce their network address and supported device and services types, enabling clients that recognize those types to immediately begin using the device.

The UPnP logo

Contents

Overview

The UPnP architecture allows peer-to-peer networking of PCs, networked home appliances, CE devices and wireless devices. It is a distributed, open architecture protocol based on established standards such as TCP/IP, UDP, HTTP, XML, and SOAP.

The UPnP architecture supports zero-configuration networking. A UPnP compatible device from any vendor can dynamically join a network, obtain an IP address, announce its name, convey its capabilities upon request, and learn about the presence and capabilities of other devices. DHCP and DNS servers are optional and are only used if they are available on the network. Devices can leave the network automatically without leaving any unwanted state information behind.

UPnP was published as a 73-part International Standard, ISO/IEC 29341, in December, 2008.[1][2][3]

Other UPnP features include:

Media and device independence
UPnP technology can run on many media that support IP including Ethernet, FireWire, IR (IrDA), home wiring (G.hn) and RF (Bluetooth, Wi-Fi). No special device driver support is necessary; common protocols are used instead.
User interface (UI) Control
UPnP architecture enables devices to present a user interface through a web browser (see Presentation below).
Operating system and programming language independence
Any operating system and any programming language can be used to build UPnP products. UPnP does not specify or constrain the design of an API for applications running on control points; OS vendors may create APIs that suit their customer's needs.
Programmatic control
UPnP architecture also enables conventional application programmatic control.
Extensibility
Each UPnP product can have device-specific services layered on top of the basic architecture. In addition to combining services defined by UPnP Forum in various ways, vendors can define their own device and service types, and can extend standard devices and services with vendor-defined actions, state variables, data structure elements, and variable values.

Protocol

Addressing

The foundation for UPnP networking is IP addressing. Each device must have a Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) client and search for a DHCP server when the device is first connected to the network. If no DHCP server is available, that is, the network is unmanaged, the device must assign itself an address. The process by which a UPnP device assigns itself an address is known within the UPnP Device Architecture as "AutoIP". In UPnP Device Architecture Version 1.0[4], AutoIP is defined within the specification itself; in UPnP Device Architecture Version 1.1[5], AutoIP references IETF RFC 3927[6]. If during the DHCP transaction, the device obtains a domain name, for example, through a DNS server or via DNS forwarding, the device should use that name in subsequent network operations; otherwise, the device should use its IP address.

Discovery

Given an IP address, the first step in UPnP networking is Discovery. The UPnP discovery protocol, defined in Section 1 of the UPnP Device Architecture, is known as the Simple Service Discovery Protocol (SSDP). When a device is added to the network, SSDP allows that device to advertise its services to control points on the network. Similarly, when a control point is added to the network, SSDP allows that control point to search for devices of interest on the network. The fundamental exchange in both cases is a discovery message containing a few, essential specifics about the device or one of its services, for example, its type, identifier, and a pointer to more detailed information.

Description

After a control point has discovered a device, the control point still knows very little about the device. For the control point to learn more about the device and its capabilities, or to interact with the device, the control point must retrieve the device's description from the URL provided by the device in the discovery message. The UPnP description for a device is expressed in XML and includes vendor-specific, manufacturer information like the model name and number, serial number, manufacturer name, URLs to vendor-specific web sites, etc. The description also includes a list of any embedded devices or services, as well as URLs for control, eventing, and presentation. For each service, the description includes a list of the commands, or actions, to which the service responds, and parameters, or arguments, for each action; the description for a service also includes a list of variables; these variables model the state of the service at run time, and are described in terms of their data type, range, and event characteristics.

Control

Having retrieved a description of the device, the control point can send actions to a device's service. To do this, a control point sends a suitable control message to the control URL for the service (provided in the device description). Control messages are also expressed in XML using the Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP). Much like function calls, the service returns any action-specific values in response to the control message. The effects of the action, if any, are modeled by changes in the variables that describe the run-time state of the service.

Event notification

The next step in UPnP networking is event notification, or "eventing". The event notification protocol defined in the UPnP Device Architecture is known as GENA, an acronym for "General Event Notification Architecture". A UPnP description for a service includes a list of actions the service responds to and a list of variables that model the state of the service at run time. The service publishes updates when these variables change, and a control point may subscribe to receive this information. The service publishes updates by sending event messages. Event messages contain the names of one or more state variables and the current value of those variables. These messages are also expressed in XML. A special initial event message is sent when a control point first subscribes; this event message contains the names and values for all evented variables and allows the subscriber to initialize its model of the state of the service. To support scenarios with multiple control points, eventing is designed to keep all control points equally informed about the effects of any action. Therefore, all subscribers are sent all event messages, subscribers receive event messages for all "evented" variables that have changed, and event messages are sent no matter why the state variable changed (either in response to a requested action or because the state the service is modeling changed).

Presentation

The final step in UPnP networking is presentation. If a device has a URL for presentation, then the control point can retrieve a page from this URL, load the page into a web browser, and depending on the capabilities of the page, allow a user to control the device and/or view device status. The degree to which each of these can be accomplished depends on the specific capabilities of the presentation page and device.

UPnP AV standards

UPnP AV stands for UPnP Audio and Video. On 12 July 2006 the UPnP Forum announced the release of version 2 of the UPnP Audio and Video specifications (UPnP AV v2), with new MediaServer version 2.0 and MediaRenderer version 2.0 classes. These enhancements are created by adding capabilities to the UPnP AV MediaServer and MediaRenderer device classes that allow a higher level of interoperability between MediaServers and MediaRenderers from different manufacturers. Some of the early devices complying with these standards were marketed by Philips under the Streamium brand name.

The UPnP AV standards have been referenced in specifications published by other organizations including Digital Living Network Alliance Networked Device Interoperability Guidelines[7], International Electrotechnical Commission IEC 62481-1 [8], and Cable Television Laboratories OpenCable Home Networking Protocol [9].

UPnP AV components

  • UPnP MediaServer DCP - which is the UPnP-server (a 'master' device) that media library information and streams media-data (like audio/video/picture/files) to UPnP-clients on the network.
  • UPnP MediaServer ControlPoint - which is the UPnP-client (a 'slave' device) that can auto-detect UPnP-servers on the network to browse and stream media/data-files from them.
  • UPnP MediaRenderer DCP - which is a 'slave' device that can render (play) content.
  • UPnP RenderingControl DCP - control MediaRenderer settings; volume, brightness, RGB, sharpness, and more).
  • UPnP Remote User Interface (RUI) client/server - which sends/receives control-commands between the UPnP-client and UPnP-server over network, (like record, schedule, play, pause, stop, etc.).
  • QoS (Quality of Service) - is an important (but not mandatory) service function for use with UPnP AV (Audio and Video). QoS (Quality of Service) refers to control mechanisms that can provide different priority to different users or data flows, or guarantee a certain level of performance to a data flow in accordance with requests from the application program. Since UPnP AV is mostly to deliver streaming media that is often near real-time or real-time audio/video data which it is critical to be delivered within a specific time or the stream is interrupted. QoS (Quality of Service) guarantees are especially important if the network capacity is limited, for example public networks, like the internet.
    • QoS (Quality of Service) for UPnP consist of Sink Device (client-side/front-end) and Source Device (server-side/back-end) service functions. With classes such as; Traffic Class that indicates the kind of traffic in the traffic stream, (for example, audio or video). Traffic Identifier (TID) which identifies data packets as belonging to a unique traffic stream. Traffic Specification (TSPEC) which contains a set of parameters that define the characteristics of the traffic stream, (for example operating requirement and scheduling). Traffic Stream (TS) which is a unidirectional flow of data that originates at a source device and terminates at one or more sink device(s).

NAT traversal

One solution for NAT (Network Address Translation) traversal, called the Internet Gateway Device (IGD) Protocol, is implemented via UPnP. Many routers and firewalls expose themselves as Internet Gateway Devices, allowing any local UPnP controller to perform a variety of actions, including retrieving the external IP address of the device, enumerate existing port mappings, and adding and removing port mappings. By adding a port mapping, a UPnP controller behind the IGD can enable traversal of the IGD from an external address to an internal client.

Problems with UPnP

Lack of Default Authentication

The UPnP protocol, as default, does not implement any authentication, so UPnP device implementations must implement their own authentication mechanisms, or implement the Device Security Service.[11] There also exists a non-standard solution called UPnP-UP (Universal Plug and Play - User Profile)[12] which proposes an extension to allow user authentication and authorization mechanisms for UPnP devices and applications.

Unfortunately, many UPnP device implementations lack authentication mechanisms, and by default assume local systems and their users are completely trustworthy.[13][14]

Most notably, routers and firewalls running the UPnP IGD protocol are vulnerable to attack since the framers of the IGD implementation omitted a standard authentication method. For example, Adobe Flash programs are capable of generating a specific type of HTTP request. This allows a router implementing the UPnP IGD protocol to be controlled by a malicious web site when someone with a UPnP-enabled router simply visits that web site.[15] The following changes can be made silently by code embedded in an Adobe Flash object hosted on a malicious website:[16]

  • Port forward internal services (ports) to the router external facing side (i.e. expose computers behind a firewall to the Internet).
  • Port forward the router's web administration interface to the external facing side.
  • Port forwarding to any external server located on the Internet, effectively allowing an attacker to attack an Internet host via the router, while hiding their IP address.
  • Change DNS server settings so that when victims believe they are visiting a particular site (such as an on-line bank), they are redirected to a malicious website instead.
  • Change the DNS server settings so that when a victim receives any software updates (from a source that isn't properly verified via some other mechanism, such as a checking a digital certificate has been signed by a trusted source), they download malicious code instead.
  • Change administrative credentials to the router/firewall.
  • Change PPP settings.
  • Change IP settings for all interfaces.
  • Change WiFi settings.
  • Terminate connections.

This only applies to the "firewall-hole-punching"-feature of UPnP; it does not apply when the IGD does not support UPnP or UPnP has been disabled on the IGD. Also, not all routers can have such things as DNS server settings altered by UPnP because much of the specification (including LAN Host Configuration) is optional for UPnP enabled routers[17].

Other Issues

  • UPnP uses HTTP over UDP (known as HTTPU and HTTPMU for unicast and multicast), even though this is not standardized and is specified only in an Internet-Draft that expired in 2001. [1]
  • UPnP does not have a lightweight authentication protocol, while the available security protocols are complex. As a result, some UPnP devices ship with UPnP turned off by default as a security measure.

Future developments

UPnP continues to be actively developed. In fall 2008, the UPnP forum ratified the successor to UPnP 1.0, UPnP 1.1[18]. See [19] for documents destribing the published standard. [Note: please do NOT remove the reference to UPnP 1.1 again as a "fixed grammar" update - such practice is what destroys the trust people have in Wikipedia]

The standard DPWS was a candidate successor for UPnP, but UPnP 1.1 was selected by the forum.

UPnP InternetGatewaydevice's[20] WANIPConnection service do have competitive solution known as NAT-PMP, is an IETF draft introduced by Apple Inc. in 2005. However, NAT-PMP is focused only in NAT traversal. UPnP InternetGatewayDevice is currently being evolved to version 2 which preliminary content can be found from [21]

See also

References

  1. ^ International Electrotechnical Commission "ISO/IEC standard on UPnP device architecture makes networking simple and easy", 2008-12-09. Retrieved on 2009-05-07.
  2. ^ International Organization for Standardization "ISO/IEC standard on UPnP device architecture makes networking simple and easy", 2008-12-10. Retrieved on 2009-05-07.
  3. ^ UPnP Forum "UPnP Specifications Named International Standard for Device Interoperability for IP-based Network Devices", 2009-02-05. Retrieved on 2009-05-07.
  4. ^ UPnP Forum, UPnP Device Architecture version 1.0, 2008-04-24
  5. ^ UPnP Forum, UPnP Device Architecture version 1.1, 2008-10-15
  6. ^ Cheshire, S., et al, IETF RFC 3927, "Dynamic Configuration of IPv4 Link-Local Addresses", May 2005
  7. ^ Digital Living Network Alliance, DLNA Networked Device Interoperability Guidelines, 2006-10
  8. ^ International Electrotechnical Commission, IEC 62481-1,"Digital living network alliance (DLNA) home networked device interoperability guidelines - Part 1: Architecture and protocols", 2007-08-30
  9. ^ Cable Television Laboratories, OpenCable Home Networking Protocol, 2006-06-30
  10. ^ "Web4CE (CEA 2014) for UPnP Remote UI (www.ce.org/standards)". http://www.ce.org/Standards/browseByCommittee_2757.asp. 
  11. ^ "Device Security and Security Console V 1.0". http://www.upnp.org/standardizeddcps/security.asp. 
  12. ^ "UPnP-UP - Universal Plug and Play - User Profile". http://www.upnp-up.org. 
  13. ^ "Shorewall firewall author on UPnP security". http://www.shorewall.net/UPnP.html. Retrieved 2007-09-30. 
  14. ^ "Linux-IGD authors on UPnP security". http://linux-igd.sourceforge.net/documentation.php#SECURITY. Retrieved 2007-09-30. 
  15. ^ "Flash UPnP attack". http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/hacking-the-interwebs. 
  16. ^ "Flash UPnP Attack FAQ". gnucitizen.org. January 14, 2008. http://www.gnucitizen.org/blog/flash-upnp-attack-faq. 
  17. ^ "Internet Gateway Device (IGD) V 1.0". UPnP Forum. November 12, 2001. http://www.upnp.org/standardizeddcps/igd.asp. 
  18. ^ "UPnP 1.1 - designing for performance & compatibility (Consumer Electronics, IEEE Transactions on)". http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?url=/iel5/30/30482/01405701.pdf?temp=x. 
  19. ^ http://www.upnp.org/resources/documents.asp
  20. ^ "UPnP InternetGateway:1". http://www.upnp.org/standardizeddcps/igd.asp. 
  21. ^ "UPnP Forum Gateway Working Committee: IGD:2 Improvements over IGD:1". http://www.upnp.org/resources/documents/UPnPIGD2vsIGD1d10032009.pdf. 

Books

  • Golden G. Richard: Service and Device Discovery : Protocols and Programming, McGraw-Hill Professional, ISBN 0-07-137959-2
  • Michael Jeronimo, Jack Weast: UPnP Design by Example: A Software Developer's Guide to Universal Plug and Play, Intel Press, ISBN 0-9717861-1-9

External links

Documentation

News

Software

  • Foo_UPnP, UPnP/DLNA client and server for Foobar2000
  • UPnP Port Works (alias UPnPPW) is a software implementation to configure UPnP IGD devices via commandline.
  • BRisa BRisa is written in Python for Internet Tablet OS or platforms. It enables to create UPnP devices and services, allowing users to share and search content from UPnP A/V devices. It offers a plugin architecture enabling new services such as Flickr to be added as UPnP services.
  • GUPnP is an object-oriented open source framework for creating UPnP devices and control points, written in C using GObject and libsoup.
  • Portable SDK for UPnP Devices provides an API and open source code for building control points, devices, and bridges compliant with UPnP Device Architecture Specification v1.0 and support operating systems like Linux, *BSD, Solaris and others.
  • Platinum SDK Cross-Platform SDK written in C++ for building UPnP Devices and Control Points.
  • Barracuda UPnP Device and Control Point SDK for embedded devices.
  • Unplug n' Pray Utility to disable unnecessary UPnP servers running on home Windows machines.
  • Coherence Some free DLNA/UPnP tools (MediaServer/MediaRender) with a python framework. Running on Linux/BSD/Windows
  • AdoubleU IntelligentShare UPnP SDK for J2SE / J2ME / MIDP 2.0 Running on Linux/BSD/Windows/Mobile Devices
  • J. River Media Center includes a UPnP server (aka UPnP Device) for its library.
  • MiniUPnP Project includes a UPnP IGD device implementation (ie server) and a library and tool to control UPnP IGD devices.
  • Jamcast is a UPnP AV MediaServer software implementation for Windows platforms.

Search unanswered questions...
Enter a question here...
Search: All sources Community Q&A Reference topics
 
 

 

Copyrights:

Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Universal Plug and Play" Read more