(ad 4th or 5th cent.) Indian philosopher, eventually of the Yogacara school of Buddhism. He taught a kind of idealism, arguing from illusion that mental images are the sole reality known to us.
| Philosophy Dictionary: Vasubandhu |
| Buddhism Dictionary: Vasubandhu |
The half-brother of Asaṇga, he was probably born during the late 4th century ce in north-west India where he initially studied Sarvāstivādin Abhidharma as presented in the Mahāvibhāṣā. Dissatified with those teachings, he wrote an important summary and critique of the Mahāvibhāṣā from the Sautrāntrika viewpoint. Later in his life he is said to have converted to Mahāyāna and become one of the most influential founders of the Yogācāra school. He wrote two key works summarizing Yogācāra doctrines, the Viṃśatikā and the Triṃśikā as well as several major commentaries on works by Asaṇga and Maitreyanātha. Some modern scholars, notably Frauwallner, have sought to distinguish two Vasubandhus, one the Yogācārin and the other the Sautrāntika, but this view should probably be rejected now on the basis of the anonymous Abhidharma-dīpa which clearly identifies Vasubandhu as the sole author of both groups of writings.
| Wikipedia: Vasubandhu |
| Lands |
| India • China • Japan Korea • Vietnam Taiwan • Mongolia Tibet • Bhutan • Nepal |
| Doctrine |
| Bodhisattva • Upāya Samādhi • Prajñā Śunyatā • Trikāya |
| Mahāyāna Sūtras |
| Prajñāpāramitā Sūtras Lotus Sūtra Nirvāṇa Sūtra Saṃdhinirmocana Sūtra Avataṃsaka Sūtra Śūraṅgama Sūtra |
| Mahāyāna Schools |
| Mādhyamaka Yogācāra Esoteric Buddhism Pure Land • Zen Tiantai • Nichiren |
| History |
| Silk Road • Nāgārjuna Asaṅga • Vasubandhu Bodhidharma |
| Portal |
Vasubandhu (fl. 4th c.) was, according to Mahayana Buddhist tradition, an Indian Buddhist scholar-monk, and along with his half-brother Asanga, one of the main founders of the Indian Yogācāra school. However, some scholars consider Vasubandhu to be two distinct people. Vasubandhu is one of the most influential figures in the entire history of Buddhism. In the Jodo Shinshu branch of Buddhism, he is considered the Second Patriarch. In Zen, he is 21st Patriarch.
Contents |
Born a brahmin[1] Vasubandhu was said to have been the half brother of Asanga, another key personage in the founding of the Yogacara School. He resided at Kausambhi in Gandhāra (near modern Allahabad) where he was trained in the orthodox Sarvastivada Order of Buddhism, which had its seat at Kausambhi. He was contemporaneous with King Chandragupta I, the father of Samudragupta. This information temporally places this Vasubandhu in the fourth century CE.[2]
Vasubandu is said to have trained in the Vaibhashika-Sarvāstivādin when he initially studied Vaibhashika-Sarvāstivādin Abhidharma, as presented in the Mahā-vibhāsa. Dissatified with those teachings, he wrote a summary of the Vaibhashika perspective in the Abhidharmakośa in verse and an auto-commentary, the Abhidharmakośa-bhāsya, which summarized and critiqued the Mahāvibhāsa from the Sautrāntrika viewpoint.
He is later said to have converted to the Mahāyāna tradition under the influence of his brother, whereupon he composed a number of voluminous treatises, especially on Yogācāra doctrines. Most influential in the East Asian Buddhist tradition was probably the Triṃśikā-vijñaptimātratā, the Thirty Verses on Representation-only and its companion Vimśatikā, but he also wrote a large number of other works, including:
Vasubandhu contributed to Buddhist logic and is held to have been the origin of 'formal logic' in the Dharmic logico-epistemological tradition. Vasubandhu was particularly interested in 'logic' to fortify his contributions to the traditions of dialectical contestability and debate.
Anacker (2005: p.31) holds that:
A Method for Argumentation (Vāda-vidhi) is the only work on logic by Vasabandhu which has to any extent survived. It is the earliest of the treatises known to have been written by him on the subject. This is all the more interesting because Vāda-vidhi marks the dawn of Indian formal logic. The title, "Method for Argumentation", indicates that Vasabandhu's concern with logic was primarily motivated by the wish to mould formally flawless arguments, and is thus a result of his interest in philosophical debate.[3]
Erich Frauwallner, a mid-twentieth century Buddhologist, sought to distinguish two Vasubandhus, one the Yogācārin and the other a Sautrāntika, but this view has largely fallen from favor in part on the basis of the anonymous Abhidharma-dīpa, a critique of the Abhidharmakośa which clearly identifies Vasubandhu as the sole author of both groups of writings. According to Dan Lusthaus, "Since the progression and development of his thought ... is so strikingly evident in these works, and the similarity of vocabulary and style of argument so apparent across the texts, the theory of Two Vasubandhus has little merit."[4] There is no scholarly consensus on this question at present.[5]
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)
| Saṃghabhadra | |
| Mahāyāna-sūtrālaṃkāra | |
| Sthiramati |
Copyrights:
![]() | Philosophy Dictionary. The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy. Copyright © 1994, 1996, 2005 by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. Read more | |
![]() | Buddhism Dictionary. A Dictionary of Buddhism. Copyright © 2003, 2004 by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. Read more | |
![]() | Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Vasubandhu". Read more |