Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Email
Answers.com

will

 
Dictionary: will1   (wĭl) pronunciation
 
n.
    1. The mental faculty by which one deliberately chooses or decides upon a course of action: championed freedom of will against a doctrine of predetermination.
    2. The act of exercising the will.
    1. Diligent purposefulness; determination: an athlete with the will to win.
    2. Self-control; self-discipline: lacked the will to overcome the addiction.
  1. A desire, purpose, or determination, especially of one in authority: It is the sovereign's will that the prisoner be spared.
  2. Deliberate intention or wish: Let it be known that I took this course of action against my will.
  3. Free discretion; inclination or pleasure: wandered about, guided only by will.
  4. Bearing or attitude toward others; disposition: full of good will.
    1. A legal declaration of how a person wishes his or her possessions to be disposed of after death.
    2. A legally executed document containing this declaration.

v., willed, will·ing, wills.

v.tr.
  1. To decide on; choose.
  2. To yearn for; desire: “She makes you will your own destruction” (George Bernard Shaw).
  3. To decree, dictate, or order.
  4. To resolve with a forceful will; determine.
  5. To induce or try to induce by sheer force of will: We willed the sun to come out.
  6. To grant in a legal will; bequeath.
v.intr.
  1. To exercise the will.
  2. To make a choice; choose.
idiom:

at will

  1. Just as or when one wishes.

[Middle English, from Old English willa.]


will2 (wĭl) pronunciation
aux.v., Past tense would (wʊd).
  1. Used to indicate simple futurity: They will appear later.
  2. Used to indicate likelihood or certainty: You will regret this.
  3. Used to indicate willingness: Will you help me with this package?
  4. Used to indicate requirement or command: You will report to me afterward.
  5. Used to indicate intention: I will too if I feel like it.
  6. Used to indicate customary or habitual action: People will talk.
  7. Used to indicate capacity or ability: This metal will not crack under heavy pressure.
  8. Used to indicate probability or expectation: That will be the messenger ringing.
tr. & intr.v.

To wish; desire: Do what you will. Sit here if you will. See Usage Note at shall.

[Middle English willen, to intend to, from Old English willan.]


Search unanswered questions...
Enter a word or phrase...
All Community Q&A Reference topics
 

A legally enforceable declaration of how a person wishes his or her property to be distributed after death. In a will, a person can also recommend a guardian for his or her children. Also known as a "will and testament".

Investopedia Says:
Making a will is a very important component of estate planning. In it you declare who gets your belongings and assets when you die. If you do not have a will, the distribution of your property is left up to the government, and may even end up becoming state property. A will therefore helps ensure your wishes are carried out, and it can make things simpler and easier for your heirs.

Related Links:
What would happen if you were suddenly unable to manage your financial affairs? Preparation is the best protection. The Importance Of Estate And Contingency Planning
Make sure the needs of baby boomers and their parents are met - if not exceeded. Providing For Older Clients
With some preparation, you can save your heirs from paying a hefty estate tax. Here are some tips. Getting Started On Your Estate Plan
Life changes make it time to rewrite your plan's designations. Update Your Beneficiaries
Don't let bad estate planning lead to unnecessary costs and stress for your inheritors. Skipping-Out on Probate Costs
If you're a beneficiary of a retirement account, you should know your distribution options. Inherited Retirement Plan Assets - Part 1


 

Commercial term denoting agreement that buyer shall accept delivery of goods in the condition in which they are found on inspection prior to purchase, even if they are damaged or defective.

 

Formal document distributing the assets of an estate after the death of the person signing it-the Testator. A will is usually written, signed by the testator in the presence of two or more witnesses. Most states also allow handwritten or holographic wills if signed in the presence of the testator by two or more witnesses. Preparing a will has several advantages over leaving an estate Intestate: the testator can designate how the estate will be distributed and can establish a Testamentary Trust for the benefit of children. A will also allows property or real estate owned by the testator to be sold more easily. See alsoInter Vivos Trust; Trust.

 

Without guarantees as to condition, as in a sale. Premises are accepted by a buyer or tenant as they are, including physical defects except Latent Defects. See Caveat Emptor.
Example: Baker purchases a building from Abel with the understanding that the building is to be conveyed as is. When Baker discovers that the roof leaks, Abel is not legally responsible for repairs.

 
Thesaurus: will
Top

noun

  1. The mental faculty by which one deliberately chooses or decides: volition. See willing/unwilling.
  2. Unwavering firmness of character, action, or will: decidedness, decision, decisiveness, determination, firmness, purpose, purposefulness, resoluteness, resolution, resolve, toughness, willpower. See certain/uncertain, strong/weak.
  3. A desire for a particular thing or activity: fancy, liking, mind, pleasure. See like/dislike.
  4. Unrestricted freedom to choose: discretion, pleasure. See free/unfree.

verb

  1. To have the desire or inclination to: choose, desire, like1, please, want, wish. Idioms: have a mind, see fit. See desire.
  2. To give (property) to another person after one's death: leave1. Law bequeath, devise. See give/take/reciprocity, law.

 
Antonyms: will
Top

v

Definition: choose
Antonyms: neglect, pass

v

Definition: give, bequeath to another
Antonyms: keep, receive


 

In law, a formal declaration, usually in the form of an executed document, of a person's wishes regarding the disposal of his or her property after death. It is valid if it meets the formalities of the law, which usually requires that it be witnessed. It may be considered invalid if, among other instances, the testator was mentally incapable of disposing of his or her property, if it imposes unreasonable or cruel demands as a condition of inheritance, or if the testator did not have clear title to the bequeathed assets. Any party who contests a will must bring the claim within a time specified by statute and must bear the burden of proof in demonstrating that the will is faulty. See also probate.

For more information on will, visit Britannica.com.

 
Architecture: will
Top

The word will is used in connection with acts and actions required of the owner or of the architect/engineer; it is used by the owner or purchaser as a self-imposed requirement; denotes the information the owner will supply, documents the owner will review, and approvals the owner will issue––all at the proper time.


 

To have a will is to be able to desire an outcome and to purpose to bring it about. Strength of will, or firmness of purpose, is supposed to be good, and weakness of will or akrasia bad. See also free will, good will, volition.

 
in law
in philosophy and psychology

will, in law, document expressing the wishes of a person (known as a testator) concerning the disposition of her property after her death. If a person dies intestate, i.e., without a valid will, statutes determine how her property is divided up among her relatives; if no relatives can be found, the property escheats (i.e., goes to the government). Wills are made to vary the statutory scheme (e.g., to give a crippled child more money than a healthy child). The will may provide for outright grants or for the establishment of trusts. No particular form of words is necessary in a will, only a clear expression of intent. Statutes usually protect the surviving spouse and children, prescribing for them a set proportion of the estate whatever the provisions of the will. Wills ordinarily must be in writing, but in certain strictly defined circumstances (e.g., in the case of soldiers or sailors in combat) the law may recognize an oral will as reported by a witness. Written wills must be subscribed (i.e., signed below the complete text) by the testator and must bear the signatures of two (or, in some jurisdictions, three) people who witnessed the testator's signature. A person has capacity to make a will only when he is of sound mind and is not unduly influenced by an interested party. Persons below a certain age (usually ranging from 18 to 21) are deemed not to have the capacity. All objections to a will must be made at the probate, which precedes the distribution (administration) of the property. Real and personal property were once passed on by two different systems, but today only remnants of the division remain (e.g., in separate sets of terms). In England the Statute of Wills (1540) lifted many restrictions on the use of wills and permitted the testator to dispose of real property by will. See heir.

will, in philosophy and psychology, term used to describe that which is alleged to stimulate the motivation of purposeful activity. It is characteristic of the will that it can be observed only in oneself and can be attributed to others only by inference from their behavior. There is no generally accepted explanation in psychology for the apparent freedom people enjoy to do what they will, i.e., to originate the stimuli necessary to initiate a course of action. Until recently the psychological discussions of the will have been closely related to the philosophical. Disagreements have been extreme. One approach has been the doctrine of determinism, which denies the reality of the will. Another type simply accepts the will—the motive power of the personality—as the faculty or function of the person. This idea is generally based on intuitive grounds and is associated with Plato, Aristotle, Lucretius, St. Thomas Aquinas, René Descartes, and Immanuel Kant. Others have considered it the externalized result of the interaction of conflicting elements. These include Baruch Spinoza, G. W. von Leibniz, David Hume, J. G. Herbart, Wilhelm Wundt, Herbert Spencer, and Hugo Münsterberg. Still others have considered the will to be the manifestation of the personality striving to accomplish its purposes. Among these are St. Augustine, Duns Scotus, Thomas Hobbes, Arthur Schopenhauer, Friedrich Nietzsche, William McDougall, and John Dewey. Modern psychology has tended to consider the concept of the will as an unscientific principle. The problems involved in dealing with it are largely absorbed in other areas of investigation, such as the psychology of adjustment, the study of unconscious motivation, the concept of attention, and the influence of endocrine balance.


 
This entry contains information applicable to United States law only.

A document in which a person specifies the method to be applied in the management and distribution of his estate after his death.

A will is the legal instrument that permits a person, the testator, to make decisions on how his estate will be managed and distributed after his death. At common law, an instrument disposing of personal property was called a "testament," whereas a will disposed of real property. Over time the distinction has disappeared so that a will, sometimes called a "last will and testament," disposes of both real and personal property. If a person does not leave a will, or the will is declared invalid, the person will have died intestate, resulting in the distribution of the estate according to the laws of descent and distribution of the state in which the person resided. Because of the importance of a will, the law requires it to have certain elements to be valid. Apart from these elements, a will may be ruled invalid if the testator made the will as the result of undue influence, fraud, or mistake.

A will serves a variety of important purposes. It enables a person to select her heirs rather than allowing the state laws of descent and distribution to choose the heirs, who, although blood relatives, might be people the testator dislikes or with whom she is unacquainted. A will allows a person to decide which individual could best serve as the executor of her estate, distributing the property fairly to the beneficiaries while protecting their interests, rather than allowing a court to appoint a stranger to serve as administrator. A will safeguards a person's right to select an individual to serve as guardian to raise her young children in the event of her death.

The failure to execute a will might ultimately reduce the financial worth of the estate because additional legal fees and time delays usually ensue when a court must appoint an administrator or guardian or deal with a matter that could have been settled easily by a will.

The right to dispose of property by a will is controlled completely by statute. Since the 1970s, many states have adopted all or parts of the Uniform Probate Code, which attempts to simplify the laws concerning wills and estates. When a person dies, the law of her domicile (permanent residence) will control the method of distribution of her personal property, such as money, stock, or automobiles. The real property, such as farm or vacant land, will pass to the intended heirs according to the law of the state in which the property is located. Though a testator may exercise much control over the distribution of property, state laws protect spouses and children by providing ways of guaranteeing that a spouse will receive a minimum amount of property, regardless of the provisions of the will.

Requirements of a Will

A valid will cannot exist unless three essential elements are present. First, there must be a competent testator. Second, the document purporting to be a will must meet the execution requirements of statutes, often called the Statute of Wills, designed to ensure that the document is not a fraud but is the honest expression of the testator's intention. Third, it must be clear that the testator intended the document to have the legal effect of a will.

If a will does not satisfy these requirements, any person who would have a financial interest in the estate under the laws of descent and distribution can start an action in the probate court to challenge the validity of the will. The persons who inherit under the will are proponents of the will and defend it against such an attack. This proceeding is known as a will contest. If the people who oppose the admission of the will to probate are successful, the testator's estate will be distributed according to the laws of descent and distribution or the provisions of an earlier will, depending on the facts of the case.

Competent Testator

A competent testator is a person who is of sound mind and requisite age at the time that he makes the will, not at the date of his death when it takes effect. Anyone over a minimum age, usually eighteen, is legally capable of making a will as long as he is competent. A person under the minimum age dies intestate (regardless of efforts to make a will), and his property will be distributed according to the laws of descent and distribution.

An individual has testamentary capacity (sound mind) if he is able to understand the nature and extent of his property, the natural objects of his bounty (to whom he would like to leave the estate), and the nature of the testamentary act (the distribution of his property when he dies). He must also understand how these elements are related so that he can express the method of disposition of property.

A testator is considered mentally incompetent (incapable of making a will) if she has a recognized type of mental deficiency, such as mental retardation or severe mental illness. Mere eccentricities, such as the refusal to bathe, are not considered insane delusions, nor are mistaken beliefs or prejudices about family members. A person who uses drugs or alcohol can validly execute a will as long as she is not under the influence of drugs or intoxicated at the time she makes the will. Illiteracy, old age, or severe physical illness do not automatically deprive a person of a testamentary capacity, but they are factors to be considered along with the particular facts of the case.

Execution of Wills

Every state has statutes prescribing the formalities to be observed in making a valid will. The requirements relate to the writing, signing, witnessing, or attestation of the will in addition to its publication. These legislative safeguards prevent tentative, doubtful, or coerced expressions of desire from controlling the manner in which a person's estate is distributed.

Writing

Wills usually must be in writing but can be in any language and inscribed with any material or device on any substance that results in a permanent record. Generally, most wills are printed on paper to satisfy this requirement. Many states do not recognize as valid a will that is handwritten and signed by the testator. In states that do accept such a will, called a holographic will, it usually must observe the formalities of execution unless exempted by statute. Some jurisdictions also require that such wills be dated by the testator's hand.

Signature

A will must be signed by the testator. Any mark, such as an X, a zero, a check mark, or a name intended by a competent testator to be her signature to authenticate the will, is a valid signing. Some states permit another person to sign a will for a testator at the testator's direction or request or with her consent.

Many state statutes require that the testator's signature be at the end of the will. If it is not, the entire will may be invalidated in those states, and the testator's property will pass according to the laws of descent and distribution. The testator should sign the will before the witnesses sign, but the reverse order is usually permissible if all sign as part of a single transaction.

Witnesses

Statutes require a certain number of witnesses to a will. Most require two, although others mandate three. The witnesses sign the will and must be able to attest (certify) that the testator was competent at the time she made the will.

Though there are no formal qualifications for a witness, it is important that a witness not have a financial interest in the will. If a witness has an interest, his testimony about the circumstances will be suspect because he will profit by its admission to probate. In most states such witnesses must either " purge" their interest under the will ( forfeit their rights under the will) or be barred from testifying, thereby defeating the testator's testamentary plan. If, however, the witness also would inherit under the laws of descent and distribution should the will be invalidated, he will forfeit only the interest in excess of the amount he would receive if the will were voided.

Acknowledgment

A testator is usually required to publish the will — that is, to declare to the witnesses that the instrument is his will. This declaration is called an acknowledgment. No state requires, however, that the witnesses know the contents of the will.

Although some states require a testator to sign the will in the presence of witnesses, the majority require only an acknowledgment of the signature. If a testator shows the signature on a will that he has already signed to a witness and acknowledges that it is his signature, the will is thereby acknowledged.

Attestation

An attestation clause is a certificate signed by the witnesses to a will reciting performance of the formalities of execution that the witnesses observed. It usually is not required for a will to be valid, but in some states it is evidence that the statements made in the attestation are true.

Testator's Intent

For a will to be admitted to probate, it must be clear that the testator acted freely in expressing her testamentary intention. A will executed as a result of undue influence, fraud, or mistake can be declared completely or partially void in a probate proceeding.

Undue Influence

Undue influence is pressure that takes away a person's free will to make decisions, substituting the will of the influencer. A court will find undue influence if the testator was capable of being influenced, improper influence was exerted on the testator, and the testamentary provisions reflect the effect of such influence. Mere advice, persuasion, affection, or kindness does not alone constitute undue influence.

Questions of undue influence typically arise when a will deals unjustly with persons believed to be the natural objects of the testator's bounty. However, undue influence is not established by inequality of the provisions of the will, because this would interfere with the testator's ability to dispose of the property as she pleases. Examples of undue influence include threats of violence or criminal prosecution of the testator, or the threat to abandon a sick testator.

Fraud

Fraud differs from undue influence in that the former involves misrepresentation of essential facts to another to persuade her to make and sign a will that will benefit the person who misrepresents the facts. The testator still acts freely in making and signing the will.

The two types of fraud are fraud in the execution and fraud in the inducement. When a person is deceived by another as to the character or contents of the document she is signing, she is the victim of fraud in the execution. Fraud in the execution includes a situation where the contents of the will are knowingly misrepresented to the testator by someone who will benefit from the misrepresentation.

Fraud in the inducement occurs when a person knowingly makes a will but its terms are based on material misrepresentations of facts made to the testator by someone who will benefit from the testator's beliefs in such lies.

Persons deprived of benefiting under a will because of fraud or undue influence can obtain relief only by contesting the will. If a court finds fraud or undue influence, it may prevent the wrongdoer from receiving any benefit from the will and may distribute the property to those who contested the will.

Mistake

When a testator intended to execute his will but by mistake signed the wrong document, that document will not be enforced. Such mistakes often occur when a husband and wife draft mutual wills. The document that bears the testator's signature does not represent his testamentary intent, and therefore his property cannot be distributed according to its terms.

Special Types of Wills

Some states have statutes that recognize certain kinds of wills that are executed with less formality than ordinary wills when the wills are made under circumstances that reduce the possibility of fraud.

Holographic Wills

A holographic will is completely written and signed in the handwriting of the testator, such as a letter that specifically discusses his intended distribution of the estate after his death. Many states do not recognize the validity of holographic wills, and those that do require that the formalities of execution be followed.

Nuncupative Wills

A nuncupative will is an oral will. Most states do not recognize the validity of such wills because of the greater likelihood of fraud, but those that do impose certain requirements. The will must be made during the testator's last sickness or in expectation of imminent death. The testator must indicate to the witnesses that he wants them to witness his oral will. Such a will can dispose of only personal, not real, property.

Soldiers' and Sailors' Wills

Several states have laws that relax the execution requirements for wills made by soldiers and sailors while on active military duty or at sea. In these situations a testator's oral or handwritten will is capable of passing personal property. Where such wills are recognized, statutes often stipulate that they are valid for only a certain period of time after the testator has left the service. In other instances, however, the will remains valid.

Revocation of a Will

A will is ambulatory, which means that a competent testator may change or revoke it at any time before his death. Revocation of a will occurs when a person who has made a will takes some action to indicate that he no longer wants its provisions to be binding and the law abides by his decision.

For revocation to be effective, the intent of the testator, whether express or implied, must be clear, and an act of revocation consistent with this intent must occur. Persons who wish to revoke a will may use a codicil, which is a document that changes, revokes, or amends part or all of a validly executed will. When a person executes a codicil that revokes some provisions of a previous will, the courts will recognize this as a valid revocation. Likewise, a new will that completely revokes an earlier will indicates the testator's intent to revoke the will.

Statements made by a person at or near the time that he intentionally destroys his will by burning, mutilating, or tearing it clearly demonstrate his intent to revoke.

Sometimes revocation occurs by operation of law, as in the case of a marriage, divorce, birth of a child, or the sale of property devised in the will, which automatically changes the legal duties of the testator. Many states provide that when a testator and spouse have been divorced but the testator's will has not been revised since the change in marital status, any disposition to the former spouse is revoked.

Protection of the Family

The desire of society to protect the spouse and children of a decedent is a major reason both for allowing testamentary disposition of property and for placing limitations upon the freedom of testators.

Surviving Spouse

Three statutory approaches have developed to protect the surviving spouse against disinheritance: dower or curtesy, the elective share, and community property.

Dower or curtesy

At common law, a wife was entitled to dower, a life interest in one-third of the land owned by her husband during the marriage. Curtesy was the right of a husband to a life interest in all of his wife's lands. Most states have abolished common-law dower and curtesy and have enacted laws that treat husband and wife identically. Some statutes subject dower and curtesy to payment of debts, and others extend rights to personal property as well as land. Some states allow dower or curtesy in addition to testamentary provisions, though in other states dower and curtesy are in lieu of testamentary provisions.

Elective share

Although a testator can dispose of her property as she wishes, the law recognizes that the surviving spouse, who has usually contributed to the accumulation of property during the marriage, is entitled to a share in the property. Otherwise, that spouse might ultimately become dependent on the state. For this reason, the elective share was created by statute in states that do not have community property.

Most states have statutes allowing a surviving spouse to elect either a statutory share (usually one-third of the estate if children survive, one-half otherwise), which is the share that the spouse would have received if the decedent had died intestate, or the provision made in the spouse's will. As a general rule, surviving spouses are prohibited from taking their elective share if they unjustly engaged in desertion or committed bigamy.

A spouse can usually waive, release, or contract away her statutory rights to an elective share or to dower or curtesy by either an antenuptial (also called prenuptial) or postnuptial agreement, if it is fair and made with knowledge of all relevant facts. Such agreements must be in writing.

Community property

A community property system generally treats the husband and wife as co-owners of property acquired by either of them during the marriage. On the death of one, the survivor is entitled to one-half the property, and the remainder passes according to the will of the decedent.

Children

Generally parents can completely disinherit their children. A court will uphold such provisions if the testator specifically mentions in the will that he is intentionally disinheriting certain named children. Many states, however, have pretermitted heir provisions, which give children born or adopted after the execution of the will and not mentioned in it an intestate share, unless the omission appears to be intentional.

Other Limitations on Will Provisions

The law has made other exceptions to the general rule that a testator has the unqualified right to dispose of his estate in any way that he sees fit.

Charitable Gifts

Many state statutes protect a testator's family from disinheritance by limiting the testator's power to make charitable gifts. Such limitations are usually operative only where close relatives, such as children, grandchildren, parents, and spouse, survive.

Charitable gifts are limited in certain ways. For example, the amount of the gift can be limited to a certain proportion of the estate, usually 50 percent. Some states prohibit deathbed gifts to charity by invalidating gifts that a testator makes within a specified period before death.

Ademption and Abatement

Ademption is where a person makes a declaration in his will to leave some property to another and then reneges on the declaration, either by changing the property or removing it from the estate. Abatement is the process of determining the order in which property in the estate will be applied to the payment of debts, taxes, and expenses.

The gifts that a person is to receive under a will are usually classified according to their nature for purposes of ademption and abatement. A specific bequest is a gift of a particular identifiable item of personal property, such as an antique violin, whereas a specific devise is an identifiable gift of real property, such as a specifically designated farm.

A demonstrative bequest is a gift of a certain amount of property — $2,000, for example — out of a certain fund or identifiable source of property, such as a savings account at a particular bank.

A general bequest is a gift of property payable from the general assets of the testator's estate, such as a gift of $5,000.

A residuary gift is a gift of the remaining portion of the estate after the satisfaction of other dispositions.

When specific devises and bequests are no longer in the estate or have been substantially changed in character at the time of the testator's death, this is called ademption by extinction, and it occurs irrespective of the testator's intent. If a testator specifically provides in his will that the beneficiary will receive his gold watch, but the watch is stolen prior to his death, the gift adeems and the beneficiary is not entitled to anything, including any insurance payments made to the estate as reimbursement for the loss of the watch.

Ademption by satisfaction occurs when the testator, during her lifetime, gives to her intended beneficiary all or part of a gift that she had intended to give the beneficiary in her will. The intention of the testator is an essential element. Ademption by satisfaction applies to general as well as specific legacies. If the subject matter of a gift made during the lifetime of a testator is the same as that specified in a testamentary provision, it is presumed that the gift is in lieu of the testamentary gift where there is a parent-child or grandparent-parent relationship.

In the abatement process, the intention of the testator, if expressed in the will, governs the order in which property will abate to pay taxes, debts, and expenses. Where the will is silent, the following order is usually applied: residuary gifts, general bequests, demonstrative bequests, and specific bequests and devises.

See: Decedent; Demonstrative Legacy; Estate and Gift Taxes; Executors and Administrators; General Legacy; Holograph; Husband and Wife; Illegitimacy; Intestate Succession; Legacy; Living Will; Parent and Child; Postmarital Agreement; Premarital Agreement; Residuary Clause; Specific Legacy; Trust.

 

Will, a basic category in philosophy, emerged in the nineteenth century as a concern of psychical research, as attempts were made to prove that human will was a dynamic energy. The earliest experimental apparatus was constructed by M. E. Sa-vary d'Odiardy. An investigation of the instrument by the Society for Psychical Research, London (Proceedings, vol. 8, p. 249) dismissed his claims.

Another instrument was designed by Sydney Alrutz, of the University of Uppsala, Sweden. He called it a volometer or "will board." It comprised a small board resting on knife-edged pegs. The longer and heavier end was supported by means of a string attached to a letter scale and held the board in horizontal position. In this position the scale registered a pressure of five ounces. If the short end was depressed, the long end rose and the letter scale showed a decrease of weight.

The task put before the subjects of Alrutz's experiment was to fix their attention on the long end and will its depression. In a number of cases, 40-100 grams of pressure was thus obtained. Among those who attempted the experiment were many members of the Sixth Psychological Congress at Geneva in August, 1909.

Theodore Flournoy wrote after his own test: "I was able to prove conclusively, after three trials, and under conditions precluding all possibility of fraud or illusion, that the will of these ladies, concentrated upon a certain material object, with a desire to produce a movement in it, ended by producing this movement as if by means of a fluid or an invisible force obeying their mental command."

While these results were impressive, the experiment was flawed by severe methodological vagueness. The experiment demonstrated an unusual effect, but said nothing about the agency involved in causing the change. It could just as easily been an experiment to demonstrate "mesmeric fluid" or ectoplasmic emanations. The intrusion of concepts of "will" have been discarded by parapsychologists in the twentieth century.

 
Word Tutor: will
Top
pronunciation

IN BRIEF: Used when talking about future action.

pronunciation Tomorrow, I will be on time.

 
Wikipedia: Will (philosophy)
Top

Contents

Will, or willpower, is a philosophical concept that is defined in several different ways.

Will as internal drive

Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche defines will similarly to the "any internally motivated action" usage, but more narrowly. In this sense, will is more a "creative spark," a certain independence and stubbornness. A person who chooses not to steal because the Ten Commandments said so would be exercising free will, because it was their choice to follow the Ten Commandments. Someone who independently forms their own moral system or who composes a musical composition pleasing to themselves, however, would be exercising an act of will.

Idealism: Will as all

In idealist models of reality, the material world is either non-existent or is a secondary artifact of the "true" world of ideas. In such worlds, it can be said that everything is an act of will. Even if you are arrested by the police, this is actually an act of your will, too; if you didn't want it to happen, you could have decided otherwise. This line of thought is seen among proponents of a spiritual or mystical universe such as the New Thought writers Frank Channing Haddock (The Power of Will) and William Walker Atkinson (Personal Power Volume V: Will Power), and the occult writer Aleister Crowley.

Free Will

The standard use of this term is as a distinction between internally motivated and caused events and external events. Jumping off a cliff would be an act of free will; accidentally falling or being pushed off a cliff would not be an act of free will.

Spinoza argues that seemingly "free" actions aren't actually free, or that the entire concept is a chimera because "internal" beliefs are necessarily caused by earlier external events. The appearance of the internal is a mistake rooted in ignorance of causes, not in an actual volition, and therefore the will is always determined. Spinoza also rejects teleology, and suggests that the causal nature along with an originary orientation of the universe is everything we encounter. More contemporary materialists have introduced into Spinozan causality a notion of randomness, which further negates notions of free will.

For both classical and natural law thinkers, human nature can be divided into three parts, reason, will, and appetite. Reason can be divided into at least two categories, theoretical reason and practical reason. Will can also be divided into two categories, that which pushes away and that which pulls toward (anger and desire). A "free will" here is defined as a "rational appetite." In other words, when a person correctly identifies what "is" or "exists" through theoretical reason, and that person correctly discerns what is perfective and fulfilling of that which exists and therefore how to act according to practical reason, and then does that, one has a free will, or a will capable of overriding and reorganizing the appetite. The materialist view is criticized for being self-contradictory. In other words, the materialist or "naturalist" who does not believe in free will, must consider his actions and consciousness illusory. Since reason and action, under the materialist model are nothing more than what must happen due to cause-effect relationships.

Will as thing in itself

Kant's Transcendental Idealism claimed that "all objects are mere appearances [phenomena]."[1] He asserted that "nothing whatsoever can ever be said about the thing in itself that may be the basis of these appearances."[2] Kant's critics responded by saying that Kant had no right, therefore, to assume the existence of a thing in itself. Schopenhauer disagreed with Kant's critics and stated that it is absurd to assume that phenomena have no basis. Schopenhauer proposed that we cannot know the thing in itself as though it is a cause of phenomena. Instead, he said that we can know it by knowing our own body, which is the only thing that we can know at the same time as both a phenomenon and a thing in itself.

When we become conscious of ourself, we realize that our essential qualities are endless urging, craving, striving, wanting, and desiring. These are characteristics of that which we call our will. Schopenhauer affirmed that we can legitimately think that all other phenomena are also essentially and basically will. According to him, will "is the innermost essence, the kernel, or every particular thing and also of the whole. It appears in every blindly acting force of nature, and also in the deliberate conduct of man…."[3] Schopenhauer said that his predecessors mistakenly thought that the will depends on knowledge. According to him, though, the will is primary and uses knowledge in order to find an object that will satisfy its craving. That which, in us, we call will is Kant's thing in itself, according to Schopenhauer.

In related disciplines

Psychologists also deal with issues of will; some people are highly intrinsically motivated and do whatever seems best to them, while others are "weak-willed" and easily suggestible (extrinsically motivated) by society or outward inducement. Apparent failures of the will and volition have also been reported associated with a number of mental and neurological disorders.[4] [5] They also study the phenomenon of Akrasia, wherein people seemingly act against their best interests and know that they are doing so (for instance, restarting cigarette smoking after having intellectually decided to quit). Advocates of Sigmund Freud's psychology stress the importance of the influence of the unconscious mind upon the apparent conscious exercise of will.

The sociologist Ferdinand Tönnies, in analysing group psychology, distinguishes between will directed at furthering the interests of the group (Wesenwille or "essential will"), and will directed at furthering individual goals (Kürwille or "arbitrary will").

Further reading


References

Notes

  1. ^ Critique of Pure Reason, A 49. At end of "General Observations on Transcendental Aesthetic," p. 39 of Müller's translation. Also B 63: "…as the external sense gives us nothing but representations of relations, that sense can contain in its representations only the relation of an object to the subject, and not what is inside the object by itself. The same applies to internal intuition."
  2. ^ ibid.
  3. ^ The World as Will and Representation, vol. I, § 21
  4. ^ Berrios G.E. and Gili M. (1995) Will and its disorders. A conceptual history. History of Psychiatry 6: 87-104
  5. ^ Berrios G.E. and Gili M. (1995) Abulia and impulsiveness revisited. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 92: 161-167

Bibliography

External links



 
Misspellings: will
Top

Common misspelling(s) of will

  • iwll
  • wiull

 
Translations: Will
Top

Dansk (Danish)
1.
aux. v. - ville

2.
n. - vilje
v. tr. - ville, testamentere
v. intr. - ville

idioms:

  • a will of one's own    egen vilje, egensindet
  • as you will    som du ønsker
  • at will    tilfældigt, efter behag, efter ønske, efter forgodtbefindende
  • good will    venlighed, fredelig, godhjertet, goodwill
  • with a will    med fynd og klem, af hjertens lyst

Nederlands (Dutch)
wil, verlangen, testament, zullen, vermaken

Français (French)
1.
aux. v. - (auxil. verbal) du futur, bien sûr/volontiers (de consentement), vouloir (offre, invitation), pouvoir (ordre, demande), devoir (supposition), pouvoir (capacité)

idioms:

  • will do    faire l'affaire

2.
n. - volonté, désir, (Jur) testament
v. tr. - avoir l'intention de, souhaiter ardemment, supplier mentalement, vouloir, (Jur) léguer (à)
v. intr. - exercer la volonté, faire un choix définitif

idioms:

  • a will of one's own    (faire) ce qu'on a envie de faire
  • as you will    comme vous voudrez
  • at will    à volonté, comme vous voulez, quand vous voulez
  • good will    bonne volonté
  • if you will    si vous voulez
  • will power    volonté (de faire)
  • with a will    avec une force, avec une volonté

Deutsch (German)
1.
aux. v. - werden

idioms:

  • will do    wird gemacht, mach ich (ugs.)

2.
n. - Wille, Belieben, Testament
v. - werden, wollen, pflegen, würd(est/e/et/en) , hinterlassen

idioms:

  • a will of one's own    sein eigener Wille
  • as you will    wie du willst
  • at will    nach Belieben
  • good will    gute Absicht, guter Wille
  • if you will    wenn Sie wollen, bitte
  • will power    Selbstbeherrschung
  • with a will    mit großem Eifer

Ελληνική (Greek)
v. - θα, θέλω, (νομ.) διαθέτω, παραχωρώ με διαθήκη
n. - βούληση, θέληση, θέλημα, επιθυμία, (νομ.) διαθήκη

idioms:

  • a will of one's own    ελεύθερη θέληση
  • as you will    όπως επιθυμείτε
  • at will    κατά βούληση
  • good will    καλή προαίρεση, (οικον.) φήμη και πελατεία
  • with a will    (καθομ.) με ζέση ή προθυμία

Italiano (Italian)
'futuro del verbo', dovere, 'imperativo del verbo', lasciare, volontà, testamento

idioms:

  • a will of one's own    avere le proprie idee
  • at will    a volontà
  • with a will    risolutamente

Português (Portuguese)
v. - desejar, irá (verbo auxiliar usado para formar o futuro)
n. - desejo (m), propósito (m)

idioms:

  • a will of one's own    ser bastante voluntarioso
  • as you will    como quiser
  • at will    exatamente como ou quando alguém deseja
  • good will    boa vontade
  • with a will    com determinação

Русский (Russian)
воля, сила воли, желание, энтузиазм, интерес, завещание, последняя воля, проявлять волю, хотеть, заставлять внушать, завещать, сбившийся с пути, запутавшийся

idioms:

  • a will of one's own    сильная воля, своенравие, упрямство
  • as you will    как хотите
  • at will    как заблагорассудится, по усмотрению
  • good will    добрая воля, доброжелательность, искренность
  • with a will    охотно, добровольно, с энтузиазмом

Español (Spanish)
1.
aux. v. - v. aux. en segunda y tercera persona para forma declaración o pregunta en futuro simple o modo condicional, en primera persona para formar una declaración futura o condicional expresando intención o deseo

idioms:

  • will do    haremos, promesa

2.
n. - voluntad, albedrío
v. tr. - desear, tener el propósito de
v. intr. - tener o sentir deseo de

idioms:

  • a will of one's own    tener voluntad propia
  • as you will    como Ud. quiera
  • at will    a voluntad, a discreción
  • good will    buena voluntad
  • if you will    si Ud. quiere, si es lo que Ud. desea
  • will power    fuerza de voluntad
  • with a will    con ilusión, con entusiasmo, de buena gana

Svenska (Swedish)
v. - skola, vilja, kunna, bruka, befalla, förmå, påverka, testamentera
n. - vilja, beslutsamhet, testamente

中文(简体)(Chinese (Simplified))
决意, 立遗嘱, 愿, 下决心, 愿意, 将, 必须, 意志, 意向, 决心

idioms:

  • a will of one's own    固执
  • as you will    如你所愿
  • at will    随意, 任意
  • good will    亲善关系
  • with a will    努力

中文(繁體)(Chinese (Traditional))
1.
v. tr. - 渴望;想要;願
v. intr. - 下決心, 願意
n. - 意志;毅力

idioms:

  • a will of one's own    固執
  • as you will    如你所願
  • at will    隨意, 任意
  • good will    親善關係
  • with a will    努力

2.
aux. v. - 將

한국어 (Korean)
1.
aux. v. - ~할 작정이다, ~할 것이다

2.
n. - 의지, 결의
v. tr. - 바라다, 의지력으로 ~를 시키다, (재산 등을) 유언으로 남기다
v. intr. - 의지를 작용케 하다, 바라다

idioms:

  • a will of one's own    스스로의 의지
  • as you will    당신 뜻대로
  • at will    뜻대로, 마음 내키는 대로
  • with a will    진지하게 , 진심으로

日本語 (Japanese)
v. - 意図する, 決意する, 意志の力でさせる, 遺贈する, 意志をはたらかせる
n. - 男子名, 意志, 意志の力, 意図, 遺言, 遺言書

idioms:

  • a will of one's own    自己の意志
  • as you will    あなたの意志で
  • at will    意のままに
  • heads will roll    首切りがあるだろう
  • it will serve    役に立つ, 目的をかなえる
  • that will do    それで十分だ
  • will have none of    拒否する
  • will not hear of    ~を絶対に認めない
  • with a will    身を入れて

العربيه (Arabic)
‏(فعل) يرغب, يشاء, يريد, يوصي (الاسم) الإرادة, رغبه, ميل, شهوة, اختيار, شهيه, تصميم, مشيئه‏

עברית (Hebrew)
aux. v. - ‮פועל עזר לציון עתיד‬
n. - ‮רצון, רצייה, כוח-רצון, כוונה, צוואה‬
v. tr. - ‮רצה, חפץ, הפעיל בכוח הרצון, ציווה, הוריש, הנחיל‬
v. intr. - ‮רצה, חפץ‬


 
Best of the Web: will
Top

Some good "will" pages on the web:


American Sign Language
commtechlab.msu.edu
 
 
 
Learn More
Decedent
Demonstrative Legacy
Estate and Gift Taxes

Post a question - any question - to the WikiAnswers community:

 

Copyrights:

Dictionary. The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition Copyright © 2007, 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Updated in 2007. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.  Read more
Investment Dictionary. Copyright ©2000, Investopedia.com - Owned and Operated by Investopedia Inc. All rights reserved.  Read more
Business Dictionary. Dictionary of Business Terms. Copyright © 2000 by Barron's Educational Series, Inc. All rights reserved.  Read more
Banking Dictionary. Dictionary of Banking Terms. Copyright © 2006 by Barron's Educational Series, Inc. All rights reserved.  Read more
Real Estate Dictionary. Dictionary of Real Estate Terms. Copyright © 2004 by Barron's Educational Series, Inc. All rights reserved.  Read more
Thesaurus. Roget's II: The New Thesaurus, Third Edition by the Editors of the American Heritage® Dictionary Copyright © 1995 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.  Read more
Idioms. The American Heritage® Dictionary of Idioms by Christine Ammer. Copyright © 1997 by The Christine Ammer 1992 Trust. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.  Read more
Answers Corporation Antonyms. © 1999-2009 by Answers Corporation. All rights reserved.  Read more
Britannica Concise Encyclopedia. Britannica Concise Encyclopedia. © 2006 Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. All rights reserved.  Read more
Architecture. McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Architecture and Construction. Copyright © 2003 by McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.  Read more
Philosophy Dictionary. The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy. Copyright © 1994, 1996, 2005 by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.  Read more
Columbia Encyclopedia. The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition Copyright © 2003, Columbia University Press. Licensed from Columbia University Press. All rights reserved. www.cc.columbia.edu/cu/cup/  Read more
Law Encyclopedia. West's Encyclopedia of American Law. Copyright © 1998 by The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.  Read more
Occultism & Parapsychology Encyclopedia. Encyclopedia of Occultism and Parapsychology. Copyright © 2001 by The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.  Read more
Word Tutor. Copyright © 2004-present by eSpindle Learning, a 501(c) nonprofit organization. All rights reserved.
eSpindle provides personalized spelling and vocabulary tutoring online; free trial Read more
Wikipedia. This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Will (philosophy)" Read more
Answers Corporation Misspellings. © 1999-2009 by Answers Corporation. All rights reserved.  Read more
Translations. Copyright © 2007, WizCom Technologies Ltd. All rights reserved.  Read more