Nasty little printer's devils spew forth from the Hoe press in this
Puck cartoon
of Nov. 21, 1888.
Yellow journalism is a pejorative reference to journalism that features
scandal-mongering, sensationalism, jingoism or other unethical or unprofessional practices by news media organizations or journalists. It has been
loosely defined as "not quite libel".
The term originated during the Gilded Age when the circulation battles between
Joseph Pulitzer's New York World and
William Randolph Hearst's New York
Journal. They ran from 1895 to about 1898 and can refer specifically to this period. Both papers were accused by critics
of sensationalizing the news in order to drive up circulation, although the newspapers did serious reporting as well. The
New York Press coined the term yellow
kid journalism in early 1897 after a then-popular comic strip to describe the down-market papers of Pulitzer and
Hearst, which both published versions of it during a circulation war.[1] This was soon shortened to yellow journalism: "We called them Yellow because they are
Yellow."[2]
Origins: Pulitzer v. Hearst
Joseph Pulitzer purchased the World in 1882 after making the
St. Louis Post-Dispatch the dominant daily in that city. The publisher
had gotten his start editing a German-language publication in St. Louis, and saw a great untapped market in the nation's
immigrant classes. Pulitzer strove to make The World an entertaining read, and
filled his paper with pictures, games and contests that drew in readers, particularly those who used English as a second
language. Crime stories filled many of the pages, with headlines like "Was He A Suicide?" and "Screaming for Mercy."[3] In addition, Pulitzer only charged readers two cents per issue
but gave readers eight and sometimes 12 pages of information (the only other two-cent paper in the city never exceeded four
pages).[4]
While there were many sensational stories in the World, they were by no means the only pieces, or even the dominant
ones. Pulitzer believed that newspapers were public institutions with a duty to improve society, and he put the World in
the service of social reform. During a heat wave in 1883, World reporters went into the Manhattan's tenements, writing
stories about the appalling living conditions of immigrants and the toll the heat took on the children. Stories headlined "How
Babies Are Baked", "Burning Babies Fall From The Roof" and "Lines of Little Hearses" spurred reform and drove up the
World's circulation.[5]
Just two years after Pulitzer took it over, the World became the highest circulation newspaper in New York, aided in
part by its strong ties to the Democratic Party.[6] Older publishers, envious of Pulitzer's success, began criticizing the
World, harping on its crime stories and stunts while ignoring its more serious reporting — trends which influenced the
popular perception of yellow journalism, both then and now. Charles Dana, editor
of the New York Sun, attacked The World and said Pulitzer was "deficient in
judgment and in staying power."[7]
Pulitzer's approach made an impression on William Randolph Hearst, a mining
heir who acquired the San Francisco Examiner from his father in 1887.
Hearst read the World while studying at Harvard University and resolved to
make the Examiner as bright as Pulitzer's paper.[8]. Under his leadership, the Examiner devoted 24 percent of its space to crime, presenting the
stories as morality plays, and sprinkled adultery and "nudity" (by 19th century standards)
on the front page.[9] A month after taking over the paper,
the Examiner ran this headline about a hotel fire:
- HUNGRY, FRANTIC FLAMES. They Leap Madly Upon the Splendid Pleasure Palace by the Bay of Monterey, Encircling Del Monte in
Their Ravenous Embrace From Pinnacle to Foundation. Leaping Higher, Higher, Higher, With Desperate Desire. Running Madly Riotous
Through Cornice, Archway and Facade. Rushing in Upon the Trembling Guests with Savage Fury. Appalled and Panic-Striken the
Breathless Fugitives Gaze Upon the Scene of Terror. The Magnificent Hotel and Its Rich Adornments Now a Smoldering heap of Ashes.
The "Examiner" Sends a Special Train to Monterey to Gather Full Details of the Terrible Disaster. Arrival of the Unfortunate
Victims on the Morning's Train — A History of Hotel del Monte — The Plans for Rebuilding the Celebrated Hostelry — Pariculars and
Supposed Origin of the Fire.[10]
Hearst could go overboard in his crime coverage; one of his early pieces, regarding a "band of murderers," attacked the police
for forcing Examiner reporters to do their work for them. But while indulging in these stunts, the Examiner also
increased its space for international news, and sent reporters out to uncover municipal corruption and inefficiency. In one
celebrated story, Examiner reporter Winifred Black was admitted into a San Francisco hospital and discovered that indigent
women were treated with "gross cruelty." The entire hospital staff was fired the morning the piece appeared.[11]
New York
With the Examiner's success established by the early 1890s, Hearst began shopping for a New York newspaper. Hearst
purchased the New York Journal in 1895, a penny paper which Pulitzer's brother
Albert had sold to a Cincinnati publisher the year before.
Metropolitan newspapers started going after department store
advertising in the 1890s, and discovered the larger the circulation base, the better. This drove Hearst; following Pulitzer's
earlier strategy, he kept the Journal's price at one cent (compared to The World's two cent price) while providing
as much information as rival newspapers.[12] The approach
worked, and as the Journal's circulation jumped to 150,000, Pulitzer cut his price to a penny, hoping to drive his young
competitor (who was subsidized by his family's fortune) into bankruptcy. In a counterattack, Hearst raided the staff of the
World in 1896. While most sources say that Hearst simply offered more money, Pulitzer — who had grown increasingly abusive
to his employees — had become an extremely difficult man to work for, and many World employees were willing to jump for
the sake of getting away from him.[13]
Although the competition between the World and the Journal was fierce, the papers were temperamentally alike.
Both were Democratic, both were sympathetic to labor and immigrants (a sharp contrast to publishers like the New York Tribune's Whitelaw Reid, who blamed their poverty
on moral defects[14]), and both invested enormous
resources in their Sunday publications, which functioned like weekly magazines, going beyond the normal scope of daily
journalism.[15]
Their Sunday entertainment features included the first color comic strip pages, and some
theorize that the term yellow journalism originated there, while as noted above the New York
Press left the term it invented undefined. Hogan's Alley, a comic strip
revolving around a bald child in a yellow nightshirt (nicknamed the Yellow Kid), became exceptionally popular when cartoonist
Richard Outcault began drawing it in the World in early 1896. When Hearst
predictably hired Outcault away, Pulitzer asked artist George Luks to continue the strip
with his characters, giving the city two Yellow Kids.[16]
The use of "yellow journalism" as a synonym for over-the-top sensationalism in the U.S. apparently started with more serious
newspapers commenting on the excesses of "the Yellow Kid papers."
Spanish-American War
Male Spanish officials strip search an American woman tourist in Cuba looking for messages from rebels; front page "yellow
journalism" from Hearst (artist: Remington)
Pulitzer and Hearst are often credited (or blamed) for drawing the nation into the Spanish-American War with sensationalist stories or outright lying. In fact, the vast majority of
Americans did not live in New York City, and the decision makers who did live there probably relied more on staid newspapers like
the Times, The Sun or the Post. The most famous example of the exaggeration is the apocryphal story that
artist Frederic Remington telegrammed Hearst to tell him all was quiet in Cuba and
"There will be no war." Hearst responded "Please remain. You furnish the pictures and I'll furnish the war." The story (a version
of which appears in the Hearst-inspired Orson Welles film
Citizen Kane) first appeared in the memoirs of reporter James Creelman in 1901, and there is no other source for it.
But Hearst was a war hawk after a rebellion broke out in Cuba in 1895. Stories of Cuban
virtue and Spanish brutality soon dominated his front page. While the accounts were of dubious accuracy, the newspaper readers of
the 19th century did not need, or necessarily want, his stories to be pure nonfiction. Historian Michael Robertson has said that
"Newspaper reporters and readers of the 1890s were much less concerned with distinguishing among fact-based reporting, opinion
and literature."[17]
Pulitzer's treatment in the
World emphasizes horrible explosion
Hearst's treatment was more effective and focused on the enemy who set the bomb—and offered a huge reward to readers
Pulitzer, though lacking Hearst's resources, kept the story on his front page. The yellow press covered the revolution
extensively and often inaccurately, but conditions on Cuba were horrific enough. The island was in a terrible economic
depression, and Spanish general Valeriano Weyler, sent to crush the rebellion, herded
Cuban peasants into concentration camps and caused hundreds of thousands of deaths. Having
clamored for a fight for two years, Hearst took credit for the conflict when it came: A week after the United States declared war
on Spain, he ran "How do you like the Journal's war?" on his front page.[18] In fact, President William McKinley never read the
Journal, and newspapers like the Tribune and the New York Evening
Post, both staunchly Republican, demanded restraint. Moreover, journalism historians have noted that yellow journalism
was largely confined to New York City, and that newspapers in the rest of the country did
not follow their lead. The Journal and the World were not among the top ten sources of news in regional papers, and
the stories simply did not make a splash outside Gotham. [19] War came because public opinion was sickened by the bloodshed, and because
conservative leaders like McKinley realized that Spain had lost control of Cuba. These factors weighed more on the president's
mind than the melodramas in the New York Journal.[20]
Hearst sailed directly to Cuba, when the invasion began, as a war correspondent, providing sober and accurate accounts of the
fighting. [21] Creelman later praised the work of the
reporters for exposing the horrors of Spanish misrule, arguing, " no true history of the war . . . can be written without an
acknowledgment that whatever of justice and freedom and progress was accomplished by the Spanish-American war was due to the
enterprise and tenacity of yellow journalists, many of whom lie in unremembered graves."[22]
After the war
Hearst placed his newspapers at the service of the Democrats during the 1900 presidential election. He later campaigned for
his party's presidential nomination, but lost much of his personal prestige when columnist Ambrose Bierce and editor Arthur Brisbane published separate
columns months apart that called for the assassination of McKinley. When McKinley was shot on September 6, 1901, the Republican
press went livid, accusing Hearst of driving Leon Czolgosz to the deed. Hearst did not
know of Bierce's column and claimed to have pulled Brisbane's after it ran in a first edition, but the incident would haunt him
for the rest of his life and all but destroyed his presidential ambitions.[23]
Pulitzer, haunted by his "yellow sins,"[24] returned
the World to its crusading roots as the new century dawned. By the time of his death in 1911, the World was a
widely-respected publication, and would remain a leading progressive paper until its demise in 1931.
In popular culture
In movies, sitcoms and other works of fiction, reporters often use yellow journalism against the main character, which works to set up the reporter
character as an antagonist.
In the Spider-Man franchise, publisher J. Jonah
Jameson smears the superhero in his Daily
Bugle with headlines such as "Spider-Man: Threat or Menace?" despite having his suspicions repeatedly proven wrong.
Likewise, in the 1997 James Bond movie Tomorrow
Never Dies, an evil media magnate tries to start a war between Great Britain
and China via sensationalized news stories; the villain alludes to Hearst's role in the
Spanish-American War, using the apocryphal quote "You provide the pictures and I'll provide
the war." (A paraphrase of this quotation -- substituting "prose poems" for "pictures" -- is also in Orson Welles' classic film "Citizen Kane.")
In Thomas Harris's novel Red Dragon, from the Hannibal Lecter series, a yellow journalist named Freddy
Lounds, who writes for the National Tattler tabloid, is tortured and set aflame for penning a negative article
about serial killer Francis Dolarhyde. In the movie Bob Roberts, Senator Roberts characterises media investigations into his business dealings as "yellow
journalism". In Harry Potter and The Goblet of Fire,
Rita Skeeter acts as a yellow journalist.
Currency
|
|
The quality of this article or section may be compromised by weasel words.
You can help Wikipedia by removing weasel words. |
The gentler pejorative "infotainment" was coined more recently to refer to generally
inoffensive news programming that shuns serious issues, but blends "soft" journalism and
entertainment rather than emphasizing more important news values. When infotainment involves
celebrity sex scandals, dramatic (or dramatized) "true crime" stories and similar trivia, it borders on the tricks of
old-fashioned yellow journalism.
Corporate media is another recent pejorative, when applied to news
conglomerates whose business interests critics see as counter to the public interest. For example, such media may avoid incisive
reporting on influential corporations or limit public information about proposed government regulation of media industries.
Collusion between political, business and media worlds sometimes brings allegations of illegal or unethical practices ranging
from fraud to antitrust violations.
While bland infotainment and unethical corporate media practices may be considered "yellow" in the sense of "cowardly," the
term yellow journalism traditionally refers to news organizations for whom some combination of sensationalism, profiteering, propaganda, journalistic bias or jingoism takes dominance over factual reporting and the profession's public
trust. If one may construe gradations of bias, then Yellow journalism may be
considered less subtle and coarser in content and execution than media bias, though
bias is indeed evident.
A current perceived rift is therefore more akin to a segmentation according to definitions of "news." The public still
attaches to "news" the connotations of "journalism." Because of these developments, the
common definition of "news" no longer belongs in the domain of journalists, but to wider television
and internet media outlets over a vast spectrum of target issues and audiences. The proliferation of web media has in a certain
sense re-validated journalistic ethics: reports that conform best tend to be treated as more authoritative. "Pseudo-news" organizations draw general audiences, who tend to fall into market demographics that each favor particular blends of issues-based entertainment along with their
"news."
See also
References
- ^ Origins of the Kid
- ^ Campbell, W. Joseph, The Spanish-American War: American Wars and the Media in Primary
Documents, Introduction
- ^ Swanberg, 1967, pp. 74-75
- ^ Nasaw, David, The Chief: The Life of William Randolph Hearst. Boston;
Houghton Mifflin, 2000, 100
- ^ Emory, Edwin and Michael. The Press and America. 4th ed. Englewood Cliffs,
NJ; Prentice Hall, 1984, 257
- ^ Swanberg, 91
- ^ Swanberg, 79
- ^ Nasaw, 54-63
- ^ Nasaw, 75-77
- ^ Nasaw, 75
- ^ Nasaw, 69-77
- ^ Nasaw, 100
- ^ Nasaw, 105
- ^ Swanberg, 79
- ^ Nasaw, 107
- ^ Nasaw, 108
- ^ quoted in Nasaw, 79
- ^ Nasaw, 132
- ^ Sloan & Startt, 191
- ^ Nasaw, 133
- ^ Nasaw, 138
- ^ Sloan & Startt 191
- ^ Nasaw, 156-158
- ^ Emery, 295
- George W. Auxier, "Middle Western Newspapers and the Spanish American War, 1895-1898," Mississippi Valley Historical
Review, 26 (March 1940):
- Procter, Ben. William
Randolph Hearst: The Early Years, 1863-1910 (1998)
- Emory, Edwin and Michael. The Press and America. 4th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ; Prentice Hall, 1984
- Joyce Milton, The Yellow Kids: Foreign correspondents in the heyday of yellow journalism." New York: Harper & Row,
1989).
- Nasaw, David, The Chief: The Life of William Randolph Hearst. Boston; Houghton Mifflin, 2000
- Morton M. Rosenberg and Thomas P. Ruff, Indiana and the Coming of the Spanish-American War, Ball State Monograph, No.
26, Publications in History, No. 4 (Muncie: Ball State University, 1976) who say Indiana papers were "more moderate, more
cautious, less imperialistic and less jingoistic than their eastern counterparts."
- Ted Curtis Smythe, The
Gilded Age Press, 1865-1900 (2003)
- Harold J. Sylvester, “The Kansas Press and the Coming of the Spanish-American War, ” The Historian, 31 (February 1969) finds
no Yellow journalism influence on the newspapers in Kansas.
- Swanberg, W.A. Pulitzer. New York; Charles Scribner's Sons, 1967.
- Mark M. Welter, "The 1895-1898 Cuban Crisis in Minnesota Newspapers: Testing the 'Yellow Journalism' Theory," Journalism
Quarterly, 47 (Winter 1970): 719—24.
External links
This entry is from Wikipedia, the leading user-contributed encyclopedia. It may not have been reviewed by professional editors (see full disclaimer)