answersLogoWhite

0

'Ashtadhyayi' was written by

User Avatar

Anonymous

13y ago
Updated: 8/17/2019

Partha mahanta .

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Who wrote the first grammar in sanskrit?

The first grammar in Sanskrit was written by Panini, an ancient Indian grammarian, who is known for his work "Ashtadhyayi." This grammar text is highly revered for its detailed rules and structure governing the Sanskrit language.


Who wrote sanskrit grammar?

The Sanskrit grammarian Panini composed "Ashtadhyayi," a foundational text in the study of Sanskrit grammar.


Who is considered as the first Grammarian of the Sanskrit literature?

The first Grammarian of Sanskrit literature is considered to be Panini. He is known for his work "Ashtadhyayi," which is a foundational text in the field of Sanskrit grammar. Panini's grammar rules are still studied and revered today.


Who is considered the father of ancient linguistics, and what contributions did Panini make to the field?

The father of ancient linguistics is considered to be Panini, an ancient Indian scholar. Panini made significant contributions to the field by developing a comprehensive and systematic grammar of Sanskrit, known as the Ashtadhyayi. This work laid the foundation for modern linguistic theories and analysis.


Is Tolkappiam older than Panini's gramatical work Ashtadyayi?

There is no evidence, either literary or epigraphical to ascertain if Tolkappiyam is older than Ashtadhyayi of Panini's. Panini's work is highly logical and the grammar follows the structure of human vocal chords. Every rule formulated therein is based on the natural behaviour of the way in which human voice progresses. on the other hand, the sutrams of tolakappiyar are arbitrary and bear no relation to voice production. Like many grammars based on arbitrary rules, Tolkappiyam tends to be prescritive and leaves many rules to be invalid in the face of logic. I have tried best to analize the sutrams of both grammars, but find that those of Tolkappiyam falls far below any logicalanalysis. Also a set of rules inless built on the structure of the larynx cannot be logical at all. If you have any valid arguments in favour of arbitrary grammars please let us know. Many thanks.


Who is the father of sanskrit grammar?

The father of Sanskrit grammar is considered to be Panini, an ancient Indian scholar who lived around the 4th century BCE. He is best known for his work "Ashtadhyayi," which is a comprehensive and systematic description of Sanskrit grammar rules.


What is panini ashtadhyayi?

PANINI WAS A SANSKRIT GRAMMARIAN OF ANCIENT INDIA HE WAS BORN PUSHKALAVATI GANDHARA ..ASHTADHYAYI MEANING EIGHT CHAPTER ASHTADHYAI is the central part of Pāṇini's grammar, and by far the most complex. it would become the model for later specialist technical texts or sutras... It takes material from lexical lists (Dhatupata,Ganapatha ) as input and describes algorithms to be applied to them for the generation of well-formed words. It is highly systematised and technical. Inherent in its approach are the concepts of the phoneme,the morpheme and theroot ..His rules have a reputation for perfection that is, they are claimed to describe Sanskrit morphology fully, without any redundancy. A consequence of his grammar's focus on brevity is its highly unintuitive structure, reminiscent of modern notations such as the " BACKUS- NUR FORM " His sophisticated logical rules and technique have been widely influential in ancient and modern linguistics.


How do you study sanskrit grammar?

The question is not clear. in a general sense we can say we study it like other language grammars. The currently used text of Sanskrit Grammar is what is known as Panini's Ashtaadhyaayee(aShTAdhyAyI). It is a collection of aphorisms about 4000 of them arranged in 8 Chapters and each chapter being divided into 4 quarters. Panin's sutras(as they are called) are however too cryptic to be understood without the help of a trained teacher. Even though several books elucidating Panini have been written, it is really very difficult(next to impossible to read it on one's own). Now this is the difficulty of learning Sanskrit Grammar by means of self-study. But the standard methos is to be aware of the supporting texts like 1. dhAtupATha 2. gaNapATha 3. uNAdi sUtras 4.li~NgAnushAsanam in addition to the sUtrapAtha( = aShTAdhyAyI) If one intends to learn Sanskrit Grammar seriously it is better to look for a trained teacher, at least for some handholding. If one's capacity to understand the commentary called bAlamanoramA by Varadaraja on Bhattoji dikshita's Siddhanta Kaumudi is considerable then self study could be done.


Do written constitutions are all written?

Yes, written constitutions are always written.


What year was written in the stars written?

it was written in1814.


Is written an adjective?

Yes, it often is (written language, written instructions). Written is the past participle of the verb to write (e.g. I have written).


Which is correct That you had written or whom you had written?

Well if you think about it- neither one is correct as it would be: To whom have you written to. or What have you written. or It says that you have written..... I hope this helped xx