Collective!
azkaban holds some serious offenders. o.o
That depends on how serious was the conviction.
Mark A Matese has written: 'Update on the Comprehensive Strategy for serious, violent, and chronic juvenile offenders' -- subject(s): Rehabilitation, Juvenile delinquents, Juvenile delinquency, Prevention, Problem youth
Karen Harrison has written: 'Dangerousness, risk and the governance of serious sexual and violent offenders' -- subject(s): Corrections, Violent offenders, Crime prevention, Sex offenders
The loss of the asset causes a MET to fail.
Level III can either mean most serious or least serious, depending on the state. However, most sex offenders can be around their own children, especially if they are not on probation with conditions that prohibit them around any child.
nope. google has serious problems about sites
Dale Mann has written: 'Intervening with convicted serious juvenile offenders' -- subject(s): Juvenile delinquents, Rehabilitation
This question implicates Assault without Great Bodily Harm (GBI). This is a felony in all U.S. States and carries a penalty of two-to-five years in State Prison. For repeat offenders, the penalty is 10 to Life (depending on offenders record and circumstances). See "three strikes you're out" laws.
Only germany was considered a serious long term threat
Germany posed the most serious, long-time threat to all allied countries.
No, of course not. No person convicted of a serious crime could ever be employed to fulfill the duties of a quasi-law enforcement position such as supervising sentenced offenders.