0
. The Tinker v. Des Moines School District (1969) case ruled that students were protected under the First Amendment. This meant that they were?
Wiki User
∙ 7y ago
entitled to the freedom of expression.
Dejah Walter
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
The Tinker v. Des Moines School District (1969) case ruled that students were protected under the First Amendment. This meant that they were?
entitled to the freedom of expression.
The tinker v Des Moines school district 1969 case ruled that students were protected under the first amendment this meant that they were?
entitled to the freedom of expression.
What is a court case that stated arm bands were protected by the first amendment?
Tinker v. Des Moines
What did the case Tinker v Des Moines establish?
Tinker v. Des Moines was a First Amendment case challenging the school district's right to make policies restricting students' and teachers' expression of free speech in school. The Court held the Fourteenth Amendment made the First Amendment applicable to the states, and determined students had a right to express their opinions in a non-disruptive manner. The 7-2 vote favored the Petitioner, Tinker.Subsequent cases have granted the schools more leeway in regulating speech.Case Citation:Tinker v. Des Moines, 393 US 503 (1969)
How did the Supreme Court reinterpret civil liberties in Tinker v. Des Moines?
it protected students' right to free expression at school
Who won tinker vs des moines?
The people who won the Tinker v. Des Moines, (1969) case were the students (Tinker) whose First Amendment right freedom of speech was upheld by the Supreme Court.Case Citation:Tinker v. Des Moines, 393 US 503 (1969)
What color were the school uniforms at the high school represented in Tinker v. Des Moines?
The Des Moines Independent School District didn't require students to wear uniforms at that time (if they ever did). The issue had nothing to do with clothing, but with the fact that several students chose to wear black armbands to symbolize their protest of the Vietnam War.Case Citation:Tinker v. Des Moines, 393 US 503 (1969)
Why New jersey v tlo important to us?
because it placed where students rights stood. so did tinker v. des moines, i think but this one was about the 4th amendment and about whether students were allowed to have certain constitutional rights at school>
What is the correct order of the events from tinker v. Des moines?
the sutdents were suspended for wearing armbands to protest the war the students sued the school district for the loss of free speech the students lost their case in several lower courts the students won their case in the US Supreme Court
What is the correct order of the events from Tinker v Des Moines?
the sutdents were suspended for wearing armbands to protest the war the students sued the school district for the loss of free speech the students lost their case in several lower courts the students won their case in the us supreme court
What amendment did Tinker v Des Moines strengthen?
Tinker v. Des Moines didn't really strengthen any amendments. The case involved an application of the First Amendment protection of free speech. It strengthened individual rights.Case Citation:Tinker v. Des Moines, 393 US 503 (1969)
Where did tinker vs des moines happen at?
Tinker v. Des Moines, 393 US 503 (1969)None. Tinker v. Des Moines, (1969) was not consolidated with any other cases; however, the US Supreme Court has heard several other cases related to protection of First Amendment speech subsequent to Tinker that has helped defined the constitutional limits of free speech relative to the school environment.Morse v. Frederick, 551 US ___ (2007)The Supreme Court held that the First Amendment does not prohibit schools from punishing students for publishing messages about illegal drugs.Bethel School District No. 403 v. Fraser, 478 US 675 (1986)The Court held that schools may prohibit the use of vulgar and offensive language, that sexualized speech does not enjoy the same protection as political speech.Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier, 484 US 260 (1988)The Court held that public school student newspapers are subject to less First Amendment protection than commercial newspapers, or even student publications established as forums for student expression. Schools may impose restrictions on student newspaper content.
