05What do you do when people disagree with your ideas?
when people disagree with my ideas i usally go in a right way with a motive that i should show the that i was right with my ideas.i undergo the matter deeply and search why people are not agreeing with my ideas .iafter anyalizing my ideas if i am right then i clearly show them them facts that my idea was right.
3 people found this useful
Jews have a lot of opinions and a lot of perspectives within their small 14-million large population. It would be absurd if everyone outside of this group magically agreed with everything the Jews put out if the Jews cannot even agree amongst themselves.
Most people who saw this new institution forming were against it.In a land where communities were self sufficient there was no needfor a constitution of this kind.
When people disagree with your ideas you should try to find factsto prove that your point of view is sound and reasonable. You canalso consider why people disagree with you and make adjustments toyour idea if necessary.
People disagree with having the Olympics in China due to therepressive nature of the Chinese government. Furthermore, theChinese government has been known to be violent against their ownpeople in times of political dissent. In addition, there is still astigma of the Western world to the Chinese gove…rnment due to itscommunism routes. Also Beijing and the surrounding area has horrendous air pollutionproblems that put athletes and spectators at risk for significanthealth problems unless they shut down all industry in a wide area(a few hundred kilometers) around. (MORE)
There are a lot of people who disagree with animal testing. Theexact number is not known. The subject of animal testing is highlydebated.
As in any country there are forms of dissent. In the People'sRepublic of China liberalization has allowed for unprecedentedamounts of new expression but it is not unlimited. Disagreementsare voiced such as the Tiananmen Square demonstrations to modernstrikes by factory workers, and even from politic…al dissidents.There are disagreements within China but they are not voiced aspublicly and openly as in democratic societies. (MORE)
They disagreed because they believed in living with harmony andloving nature, whereas the Legalists wanted a harsh gov, withenforcement of laws.
I feel it's a combination of multiple things.\n. \n1) Religious indoctrination. When you are raised to believe that a way of life or being is wrong for so long, you accept it as fact.\n. \n2) Ignorance. People fear that which they do not understand. Also they are more easily misled to believe …blatant lies about homosexuality (see #1)\n. \n3) Societal pressure. There is an underlying current in today's society that to not conform to the standard accepted norm is wrong, whether it be homosexuality or any other forms of living for one's own happiness. (MORE)
They think it's religiously immoral. In other words, they think that stem cell researches are adopting the role of God.
They don't like the fact that foreigners are stealing their jobs, homes and entire lives. It is hard for a migrator, but even harder for someone who lost something from a migrator
Joseph Stalin sent people to Siberia when they didn't agree with him. He would have some people shipped to work camps in Siberia, exiled from the country or imprisoned and/or executed. Obviously, Stalin did not do those things to everyone who had a disagreement with him. He accepted some disagree…ments and had many more less extreme methods of dealing with such people. Stalin might have someone expelled from positions in the organs of the Communist Party or from the Party itself. He might dismiss someone from a job or position. Some people simply fell out of his favor and were relegated to unimportant tasks. If Stalin did not do those things to the person who disagreed with him, he might do them to a close family member of that person. Stalin had the wife of his Prime Minister and closest adviser during World War 2, Molotov, arrested and imprisoned. To some people, like Leon Trotsky, Stalin did "all of the above." He did this even to his own friends and family. As Stalin became more powerful, he became more ruthless. As he became more ruthless, he became more paranoid and fearful of revenge. He believed that differences of opinion meant lack of loyalty, which he saw as a sign of a potential threat from that person against him. (MORE)
Because some religions say one thing while scientific evidence says another. Neither group can accept the other's point of view, since they are simply incompatible. I think it is because they see Creationism and Evolutionism as mutually exclusive rather than supportive of each other. Many people wh…o believe in evolution are atheists, but despite the rumors about him, Charles Darwin was not. Many people who believe in special creation talk of God creating man in his own image, but they are so preoccupied with the physical image that they forget about the spiritual image. They represent two extremes to which a person is expected to choose one or the other. I would have to say that throughout human history there has never been a single unanimous agreement, at least not in areas where speculation has room to maneuver. This question could almost be phrased "why doesn't everyone believe in Jesus?" Or perhaps, "why isn't everyone as objective as science?" I personally think people find some status in disagreeing, especially if the disagreement is well thought out and eloquent (or backed by aggression). Agreeing with someone about something you did not know prior gives them the status of having contributed to you, while passing such to another lends the same. There is power in agreement, some are more loath to give it up than others. This is a very lame answer, but I believe the question to be without any single right answer. (MORE)
The narrator and the girl are debating the number of children in her family, as she insists that even those who have passed away should be counted.
Because some people think that God created everything perfectly, exactly the way it was meant initially. This is referred to as creationism, and it is based solely on faith without scientific backing. Evolution is a staple of our time. It is as accepted as the fact that the world is a sphere not a… cube (as was thought in the distant past) Scientific experiments can prove the existence of simple evolution within as little as 4 months with the common fruitfly who's reproductive life is often completed within a week. So in a nutshell, people disagree with evolution because they are religious fanatics too blind to open their eyes to the truth. (MORE)
Labor camps located all throughout Siberia. the locations of most of them are still kept classified by the FSB (KGB).
Many people disagreed with Copernicus because too many of his ideaswere absurd. He used lots of mathematics that was difficult tounderstand.
Some people find that the concept of evolution disagrees with their religious beliefs concerning the creation of mankind. See Related Questions for more on the Christian perspective. While Evolution is currently the most popular theory regarding the diversity of life on earth, it is not without de…tractors whether they are religious or not. Evolution is a theory, and as such it must stand up to scrutiny and challenge over a very long time before it can be considered generally reliable. Many believe that time has long since past, and Evolution has come through with flying colors. But there are questions still, and the verdict is still in the process of being decided. It is not simply a discussion between evolutionary scientists and religion, although some faith-based communities may have a little more at stake. (MORE)
People believe you should be able to marry who you love, not somerandom person so you can benefit your family or some other similarreason. Marriage is meant for love, and many arranged marriages aregenerally unhappy because they don't love one another.
People most often disagree with eating disorders because it is very unhealthy for your body. Being an anorexic your starving your body of the nutrients that it needs to thrive and be healthy. There are many other problems that can come from allowing yourself to go down such a road in life. Its not a… happy trail. Being bulimic your bindging and eating, or purging. Its really bad for your teeth and esophagus. Along with the many other problems that can come along. Not to mention that amount of Psychological issues that arise. Also as your starving your body, when you do begin to eat "normally" you will gain weight back very quickly which won't help with the complex of desiring to loose so much weight. There is nothing can can beat a healthy diet and exercise. You feel better about the weight loss, people worry about you less, and the exercise is actually good for your body. Stay healthy and if you continue to struggle with it, you may need to seek out professional help because of the amount of physical distress your putting your body through. (MORE)
Because some people argue further that widespread gun ownership is one of the best deterrents to crime as well as potential tyranny, whether by gangs, or by goverment.
The spoken language of English has evolved (and is still evolving) however the written letters of English have not changed since 1634.
No, it has been proved by information that there is a hole inozone.Ozone layer has many holes in it. However it has aconsiderable major hole in it above Antartica continent. It isformed due to CFC gas. Beacuse of the hole there is an increase inthe temperature of earth.
YES! Many people disagreed with slavery. One group is the slaves themselves. Another is a group of people that formed the underground railroad which I highly suggest you look into if you are interested in this subject.
Bombing the German cities was killing civilians. Many people believed this was wrong and that aerial attacks should be targeted at industrial and military facilities.
Answer One: Because some people think it glamorises War. Answer Two: And also some people just don't like the anzac legend.
Aboriginal people see this day as invasion day as before 26/1/1788 they had this country to themselves. some Australians think that January 1st should be Australia day as it is the anniversary of Australia becoming the Commonwealth of Australia. However truth be known it probably should be 3rd o…f March because on the 3rd March, 1986 Australia gained full independence from england. This is what is known to us. (MORE)
"Thou Shalt Not Kill" is an overriding concern for many people. The very idea of ending a life, even with the consent or desire of the person involved is thought to be wrong.
Killled them on the spot or send them to consentration camps depending on his mood and if the people tried restraining _________________ It did not happen very often in person, anyone who did, like Speer, was close enough to him that they would not be punished.
A: The Cosmological Argument forthe existence of God was stated by St Thomas Aquinas, although he did not claim to be the first to use the Argument. Reduced to its simplest possible form, it can be stated as: . Some contingent beings exist . Contingent beings require a non-contingent ground of …being in order to exist . Therefore a non-contingent ground of being exists. For Aquinas, this can only be God. Theists hold that everything (contingent beings) must have a creator (the "first cause"), but the creator (non-contingent ground of being) does not require to be created. An argument against the Cosmological Argument says that it has three serious defects: . the first premise (Some contingent beings exist) is either unintelligible or is a truism. If it is unintelligible, it is not deserving of serious consideration. If it is a truism, nothing of importance follows from it. . It does not help the argument to decide on God as a "first cause", because it is at least as easy to regard the existence of being as uncaused. . The conclusion of the argument is so ambiguous that it seems quite impossible either to affirm or deny it. Even if we accept the Cosmological Argument, the non-contingent ground of being does not have to be a deity - we can think of it as the Big Bang. If it is a deity, then it does not have to be the Abrahamic God - we can think of it as Brahma, Ahura Mazda or any other creator god. (MORE)
they disagree because of oppinion some like spraying them to keep away insects and some dont its all to do with oppinion
some people disagreed because they knew what was going to happen to their land and that them and their people would be disrespected and their views and wishes would not be listened to.
People do not like to hear the truth. A fat person does not like being told that he/she is fat. Stupid person, does not like to hear that he/she is stupid. Very simple.
Darwin's theory has taught us may things about the world around us and how we or other living things around us have evolved, but they were very religious in the 18th century and many Christians believed that god has changed them by himself.
The Question itself is wrong.. Christians did not disagree with Darwin's ideas. If someone do so the reason should be misunderstanding of bible .... in Genesis it is written that God created sky and earth in one day, second day he created sun and other planets . Now i wanna ask u something,will the …term 'day' mean the same as now when there was no sky and no sun? Clearly it is not. So in the book Genesis the term day refers millions or billions of years. this is what Darwin also said.He was not against Christian thoughts.The book genesis is fully of myths .it should not be understood in words.I think the idea is clear now. (MORE)
Some people accept that a consensus of scientists know what they are talking about. Other people are deeply suspicious, especially when they are asked to make some changes in their lifestyle.
Don't feel bad that you're asking for proof, because even I have these doubts sometimes. 1. The afterlife- people from around the world tell stories of dying and seeing the Holy Lord and feeling His love 2. The Bible- the Bible has alot of chapters written by different people, who all seemed to know… what they're talking about and are similar. Its also relevant to world events. 3. Miracles- not only are there miracles being shared about in the Bible, but everyday someone, somewhere gets their life saved (cancer patients) 4. Creation-scientists say that evolution is the answer, but you can't change DNA and our DNA is different from apes. 5. The most important...Jesus- His birth was predicted thousands of years ago, He was an actual person dying on a cross, and the things the Bible says He quoted are true. God forgives you for doubting His existence, you don't even need to read the Bible or go to Church. Just simply believe and confess. Email me at email@example.com for questions (MORE)
Some people do not recycle things as they do not earn money by doing so. People do not take the incentive to do so as recycling is just hard work for them. And sometimes people like to use the objects instead of recycling.
Why did Alexander the Great's generals disagree with Alexander taking up the ideas and customs of the people he conquered?
The generals disagreed because they thought that their customs were the only correct and civilised way to live, they saw other cultures as being barbaric, such as the Persians. So when Alexander took up Persian customs - such as the elaborate clothing and obeisance- they saw that as Alexander mo…cking them. Also, they thought that their goal was to conquer Persia and to make the barbarian cities Macedonian, but he didn't- he became more Persian. Thus he had disagreements with his generals and the worst of which was when he killed Cleitus the black. (MORE)
Bullfighting is sport in which endangers both humans and bulls involved. This is one of the many reasons it is illegal in the UK.
people disagree with embryo screening because after finding out if their embryo has a genetic disorder (e.g cystic fibrosis or Huntington's disease) they may wish to abort it. the procedure may also cause possible harm to the mother or child.
this question does not make sense but i got the answer here it is people disagree with people who agree to disagree because they have a reason to its not like they just say nope nope that's wrong were right blah Di Dar De do that's wrong for i don't know what everyone should have a reason to why the…re disagreeing (MORE)
Aspects of the Occupy Wall St. movement that may be seen as negative are: . Some of the people being interviewed at protests aren't very informed about the goals of the movement . The movement is trying to get a bill passed. Whether or not their requests are justified, some think that they are d…emanding too drastic of changes. It isn't likely that the wealthy people of the House will impose higher taxes on themselves or agree to put a price floor 400% lower on CEO's paychecks, who they receive benefits from. . Others believe that the demands are not only improbable, but misdirected. Saying that, in time, investments by the higher class should trinkle down to the lower classes. . Some say that those without jobs most likely just need to try harder. Usually imaging a lazy addict spending all the governments money, even though 10% of the population is unemployed. . And others think that the movement isn't asking for enough, that we need to be more radical about the changes being made. . Some think that the movement is simply sit-ins and protests, not making any difference. Reasons vary very much between people, so there are many possibilities of why someone may be against it. As a somewhat opinionated answer I would like to say that it's fairly likely that the richest 1% of America is against this movement because it resembles the rebellion predicted by Karl Marx when the masses realize that they are the have nots. (MORE)
because Galileo created a telescope with a 30x zoom and looked into space and sore the planet around us and told the world about his discovery convincing everyone he was right which he was so from then till date people believe that the earth is not in the middle but 3rd from the sun Heather Harris …age 12 (MORE)
At the end of the 1800s, a large number of people still held strongly to English traditions. There was fear of losing those ties with "Mother England". Another concern, particularly for Western Australia, was that the state would not gain any of the trade benefits available to the eastern states, be…ing so far away. Western Australia initially did not wish to federate because the state was guided by Premier and former explorer John Forrest, who held back on the agreement because he wanted to ensure the economic security of the state, given its distance from the more highly populated eastern states. Forrest believed that Western Australia's very distance from the rest of Australia's states would mean it would miss out on many of the trade benefits the eastern states would enjoy. \n\nWestern Australia itself was divided over whether or not it should federate, as the people of Albany wanted to be included as part of South Australia, rather than aligning themselves with Perth and Fremantle. (MORE)
because they are stupid. religious people can wear whatever they want. its there type of fashion. TRUE!!! Answer Some people disagree with religous clothes because they are irreligous, while some religous people disagree with them because of spiritual pride ["I'm humbler than you are!"]
Cloning is a complicated and expensive process, and takes significant resources in time and money. It simply seems very wasteful considering how simple it is to get a cat naturally, and how very many unwanted cats there are in the world, to use an effectively experimental process that takes so much …time and effort. (MORE)
Well, I live in Glasgow and we don't get a lot of sun so therefore there is no Global Warming! (There's Global Freezing! JK LOL!)
He or she is being ornery and unreasonable, and obstinatelyrefusing to acknowledge the clarity and obvious correctness of my view on thematter.
People would disagree because it is not natural. The Creator YHWHmade us and said that children are a blessing. To use contraceptionis to say to the Creator Yehowah that you do not want children andtherefore also no blessing. Beliefs cause disagreements.
There are many reasons, but basically most amount to people feeling that the European Union has too much influence on their countries and what they can do. Countries have to comply with many rules, some beneficial but some more restrictive. Lots of people do not like that.