A+ Answers "True" :)
true
In any civil suit (meaning that someone is getting sued) where the amount in question exceeds $20.00 either party has the right to have the decision made by a jury. Furthermore no previous jury decision can be reversed or even discussed. Example: Nicole Simpson's family sued OJ for several million dollars after he was acquitted. The jury found in favor of the plaintiff but that did not mean that OJ was convicted of any crime.
Lava that contains a greater amount of silica will flow slower and more sluggishly. The silica affects the viscosity of the lava making it thicker and therefore moving at a slower pace.
150 million dollars in 1914 would be worth about 3,488,372,000 dollars. That is allowing for the amount of inflation that occurred over the last 100 years.
The rich have greater influence on politicians because they either give greater support or deal greater damage to reelection campaigns. The "1%" also control a massive amount of the airwaves, giving them great sway over public opinion as steered and reflected by the media. The rich also are more likely to run for office themselves, because running for almost any office is an expensive affair.
He had $189.6 billion dollars (1996 dollars), which is the second largest fortune accumulated by anyone. He gave away most of his money. At his time, he had 400 million, and before his death, gave away 350 million. After his death, the rest of his money went to charities and libraries.
A+ Answers "True" :)
its 33.33% grater than 135 dollars
25%
$10,000 is not equal to $1,000,000 dollars. One million is 100 times greater than ten thousand.
The "prayer amount" is the demand for a specific dollar amount of damages. At the ender of the allegations of a count of the complaint, plaintiff prays for jdgment in an amount of damages plaintiff thinks the case is worth. That is obsolete now as most suits now have a "demand amount" instead.
Diversity cases require an amount in controversy of more than $75,000.
Forum shopping occurs when a plaintiff has a choice of several jurisdictions in which to file a lawsuit and he choose one in which he feels he feels he has the best chance at winning. For example, where the plaintiff and defendant reside in different states the plaintiff could sue in a state court in the state where he resides, or where the defendant resides or in federal court if the amount in controversy exceeds the jurisdictional amount to qualify for the federal court's diversity jurisdiction. The plaintiff looks to file in whichever court he feels best suits his purposes, usually a state or federal court in the state of his location. This will make the suit easier and less expensive for him to pursue and harder and more expensive for the defendant to handle. The plaintiff might also feel he will get a more friendly court with a judge and jury of his own state against a person from another.
Georgia's last clear chance rule in its comparative negligence laws states that even if the plaintiff's negligence contributed to the accident, the defendant can still be held liable if they had the last clear chance to avoid the accident but failed to do so. This rule allows the plaintiff to recover damages even if they were partially at fault.
NO your Money will be deposited into a escrow account by your attorney. An escrow account is an account that your attorney name and your name is on that account. To make any withdrawal from tha account have to made by your attorney. You can close that account once that attoney receive their cost. but to close that account you are basically firing or relieving that attorney.
you have to be using a compass
In any civil suit (meaning that someone is getting sued) where the amount in question exceeds $20.00 either party has the right to have the decision made by a jury. Furthermore no previous jury decision can be reversed or even discussed. Example: Nicole Simpson's family sued OJ for several million dollars after he was acquitted. The jury found in favor of the plaintiff but that did not mean that OJ was convicted of any crime.
Once judgment is awarded, the plaintiff has not further need to prove anything. The problem then becomes collecting the money awarded in the judgment. This is neither automatic, nor is it always easy.