well air is thinner at higher elevations so i would say less at the top...
At the top, because the pressure there is lower.
less ... much less more than 27 cu ft in one cu meter
Anything less than that of 1 cubic meter? Many things...
because the air at the top of the mountain ha s a lot less oxygen in it at the bottom of it. also the air particles have less room to move then at the bottom of the mountain
It could way less, it could way more, or it could way the same. Depends on the pressure. If the pressure is the same in both cubic meters, then the hydrogen ways less than the oxygen.
The air at the top of the mountain is going to be much less dense than the air at the bottom of the mountain because it is affected less by gravity.
When it is at a lower pressure or a higher temperature.
It will float if its total density is less than that of water (1000 kg / cubic meter).
From what I recall, the air at the bottom of a mountain is usually warmer, wetter, and more oxygenated. The air at the top gets less of these three depending on as high up as you go.
Different types of wood come in different densities; most types of wood have a density slightly less than that of water (which has 1000 kilograms per cubic meter), some (like balsa) have quite a lot less, and there are even types of wood that sink in water.
It isn't. Volume and mass are two very different things. Of course, depending on the units chosen, and the material that takes up a certain space, volume may be less than mass in some cases. But, to give a counter-example: in a perfect vacuum, a cubic meter has a volume (in SI units) of 1 (cubic meter), and a mass of zero (kilograms).It isn't. Volume and mass are two very different things. Of course, depending on the units chosen, and the material that takes up a certain space, volume may be less than mass in some cases. But, to give a counter-example: in a perfect vacuum, a cubic meter has a volume (in SI units) of 1 (cubic meter), and a mass of zero (kilograms).It isn't. Volume and mass are two very different things. Of course, depending on the units chosen, and the material that takes up a certain space, volume may be less than mass in some cases. But, to give a counter-example: in a perfect vacuum, a cubic meter has a volume (in SI units) of 1 (cubic meter), and a mass of zero (kilograms).It isn't. Volume and mass are two very different things. Of course, depending on the units chosen, and the material that takes up a certain space, volume may be less than mass in some cases. But, to give a counter-example: in a perfect vacuum, a cubic meter has a volume (in SI units) of 1 (cubic meter), and a mass of zero (kilograms).
Density varies - in cold, denser areas there may be as many as 10^12 molecules per cubic meter; in hotter less dense areas, about only 100 ions in the same volume. One source puts the average at one million atoms per cubic meter. Compare to about 10^25 molecules per cubic meter for air.