answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

In a jury trial - by a jury of his peers. If the defendant choses a Bench Trial then he will be judged by the Judge.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

.....a jury of his peers.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

jurry peers

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: A defendant has the right to be judged by which of these?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

When is it all right to judge?

After you have first judged yourself.After you have first judged yourself.After you have first judged yourself.After you have first judged yourself.After you have first judged yourself.After you have first judged yourself.


What standards have to be met before a person is judged insane?

A person is not "judged" insane. Insanity is used as a defense in a criminal trial. A jury must decide,after hearing the evidence, if the defendant should be considered insane or not.


People should not be judged by others?

You are very right no one should be judged its a natural thing to be judged no one should be judged on any condistion


What does it mean when a defendant posted?

it means they make a right statement


What is a responsibility of the right to freedom of the press?

To not be judged by race or color (I THINK)


What Constitutional amendment guarantees a defendant the right to counsel to defend him or her?

The SIXTH.


What are grounds for dismissing a public defender and how do you go about doing it?

A defendant is not obligated to take the services of the public defender. If a defendant wishes to hire private counsel, he has that right, or if he wishes to defend himself, he has that right. If the defendant wishes to defend himself, the judge will inquire as to if the decision is knowing and voluntary, and if so, will allow the defendant to do so. It is a very important decision, and not one to be made lightly.


The defendant does not have the right to be told of the charges against himher?

Yes, in the US justice system the defendant always must be told what he or she is charged with.


In Gideon v. Wainwright the Supreme Court ruled that a defendant in a state court had the right to?

The right to a lawyer.


What will proving someone incompetent gain you in court?

Under the right circumstances it can get you a new trial if you claim your trial lawyer was incompetent. However, that usually occurs only with serious criminal actions and only after the defendant has written letters for years to people and agencies who might help.In a civil matter it would get any legal document such as a will, power of attorney, contract, trust, deed, etc judged null and void.Under the right circumstances it can get you a new trial if you claim your trial lawyer was incompetent. However, that usually occurs only with serious criminal actions and only after the defendant has written letters for years to people and agencies who might help.In a civil matter it would get any legal document such as a will, power of attorney, contract, trust, deed, etc judged null and void.Under the right circumstances it can get you a new trial if you claim your trial lawyer was incompetent. However, that usually occurs only with serious criminal actions and only after the defendant has written letters for years to people and agencies who might help.In a civil matter it would get any legal document such as a will, power of attorney, contract, trust, deed, etc judged null and void.Under the right circumstances it can get you a new trial if you claim your trial lawyer was incompetent. However, that usually occurs only with serious criminal actions and only after the defendant has written letters for years to people and agencies who might help.In a civil matter it would get any legal document such as a will, power of attorney, contract, trust, deed, etc judged null and void.


A defendant is innocent until proven guilty is what type of presumption?

This is a "rebuttable presumption." This means that with the right evidence, the presumption of innocence can be overcome and a defendant found guilty.


What did the defendant in the Oklahoma bombing case declare about the victimes right clarification?

that it was unconstitutional.