(in the US) Be faced by, and question, their accuser and the witnesses against them - to legal representtion - to be tried by a fair and impartial jury of their peers - not to expect any 'cruel and unusual' punishment. .
fgjryjryjryjir6y
attorney
No.
it guarantees a person who has been accused of a crime the right to a layer even if he/she cant afford one.
A person accused of a crime did not come from Roman Law of Nations.
One reason why it's important to protect the rights of a person accused of a crime, is because the person might turn out to be innocent. The US Constitution guarantees the right to due process.
The right to have an attorney & be presented with the Crown's case prior to the trial.
Miranda rights
The right to remain silent, which is proved through the US Supreme Court Case Miranda v. Arizona. He has the right to an attorney. He has the right to a jury of his peers.
how did roman law protect the rights of an accused person?
That amendment means that when a person is accused of a crime, the person has a right to a trial that is not delayed too long. The person has a right for the trial to be public and not secret. The person has a right to be judged by people who are fair and have not already made up their minds. The person has a right to know what he's being accused of, and the right to know who is accusing him and who the witnesses are who are against him. The person also has a right to find witnesses in his favor, and the person has the right to get help from a lawyer.
Unless they waive the right (by chossing to represent themselves, for example) they are always entitled to a legal representative.
That depends on the law of the country that person is in. In many country's the evidence is weighed by judges only, rather then letting any tom dick and harry make these life changing decisions
Officers must tell the suspect that they have the right to remain silent and that they do not have to confuse to their crime.