answersLogoWhite

0

If a scientist finds fossilized remnants on a bone sample, they can conclude that the bone is likely ancient and has undergone fossilization, a process where organic material is replaced by minerals over time. This discovery may also suggest the bone belonged to a species that existed in a specific geological period, providing insights into the organism's environment and evolutionary history. Additionally, the context of the find, such as the surrounding sediment and other fossils, can help the scientist make further inferences about the ecosystem in which the organism lived.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

1mo ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What can the scientist conclude from a scientist finds fossae on a bone sample?

This bone had nerve running through it.


A scientist find fossae on a bone sample. what can the scientist conclude?

This bone was near blood vessels or organs.


What can the scientist conclude from a scientist finds formania on a bone sample?

The presence of formania on a bone sample could indicate bacterial or fungal contamination. Further investigation would be needed to determine if the formania is derived from environmental sources or intrinsic to the bone itself. It is essential to rule out any potential artifacts or contamination during sample handling and processing.


Andy has two samples of liquids. Sample A has a pH of 4, and sample B has a pH of 6. What can Andy conclude about these two samplesSample A is , and sample B is ?

it`s b


What can a scientist conclude when he finds a foramina on a bone sample?

Finding a foramina on a bone sample suggests that it is a passage for nerves and blood vessels to pass through, indicating a vital function in the body. The presence of foramina can help scientists identify the bone's location in the body and potentially infer information about the individual's health and lifestyle.


A scientist studying humus would most likely examine a sample of what?

Soil


Can a scientist tell from DNA result alone what type of DNA sample were used in the test i.e. is it from blood or semen sample?

Yes, because each DNA is unique and and the scientist can just match the DNA up with andother DNA.


A scientist suspect that a mineral sample is a carbonate. which useful for identifying the sample as a carbonate?

To identify the mineral sample as a carbonate, the scientist can perform an acid test. If the sample fizzes or produces bubbles when acid is added, it indicates the presence of carbonate minerals. Additionally, spectroscopic analysis can be used to detect the specific chemical composition of the mineral, confirming its classification as a carbonate.


What could you conclude from a sample of natural water which contains a cluster of sphere-shaped bacteria but no rod-shaped or spiral-shaped bacteria as seen under a microscope?

At least two types of bacteria are contained in the natural water sample.


What forensic scientist is trying to find out the number of adenine in the DNA sample that he obtained from a crime scene. What can he assume about the number of adenine?

The forensic scientist can assume that the number of adenine molecules in the DNA sample is equal to the number of thymine molecules, as adenine always pairs with thymine in DNA. This is known as Chargaff's rule. By determining the number of thymine molecules, the scientist can indirectly infer the number of adenine molecules present in the DNA sample.


When is chromatography found in everyday life?

It is used every day by analytical scientist to find out the amount of substance in a sample.


How can a scientist assess whether a pure niobium (Nb) sample is responsible for contaminating the lab with radioactivity?

Natural niobium is not radioactive.