depends on religion.
to spread religion
usdcwe
Yes, they can be combined. Such an instance of this is referred to as a "theocracy."
Depends upon what the other religion is.
no they was not
Absolute monarchies chances throughout these periods because social structure changed as well. As people's faith in religion grew, the Church felt they too had a sense of political power.
Picture having a cat, a dog, a parrot, and a gerbil. It'd be pretty hard to manage all four, eh? Now imagine having four cats. Much easier! It's the same with monarchs and religion--it's easier to please several people of the same religion than it is to please several people of different religions. Probably the bigger reason, though, is because the monarchs thought that their religion was the only "correct" one.
Sikhism
They wanted Britain to be the same religion so the country will be easier to control and there will be less arguments about religion and rules.
Most of the renaissance monarchs controlled many aspects of government by imposed tariffs, the military and religion. Many monarchs ruled in theory that only one should be head of the affairs of the state.
One can not say, religion is a mater of FAITH, not absolute proof.