The Ptolemaic is based on the Greek philosophy that all the objects in the sky must follow circular motion in one form or another. With the Earth supposed at the centre, the planets' movements were quite complicated and each planet needed a good number of epicycles.
The idea of epicycles is that you have a large circle (the deferent) and then a small circle (the epicycle) whose centre moves round the deferent. Then the planet travels round that epicycle.
Extra epicycles were required to represent what we now know as the planets' elliptical orbits and the inclination of the orbits to the ecliptic.
The basic idea of the deferent and epicycle is easily explained in terms of Venus's orbit. We now know that with the Sun at the centre, Venus and the Earth travel round circular orbits in 225¾ and 365¼ days with radii of 1.000 units for the Earth and 0.723 units for Venus (we are assuming circular orbits to make the example easier). This is the basis of the Copernican heliocentric model.
If you choose to consider the Earth is at the centre, this motion is exactly replicated by having a deferent with radius of 1.000 units round the Earth, and on it is an epicycle with its centre going round in 365¼ days. The epicycle has a radius of 0.723 units and Venus travels round the epicycle in 225¾ days. This is the basis of Ptolemy's model (in the Ptolemaic model the Sun also went round the Earth in 365¼ days, but at a larger radius beyond the 'sphere' of Venus).
Both these models represent the position of Venus as seen from the Earth with equal accuracy. That is still the case when the extra epicycles are added for ellipticity, inclination et cetera.
So the issue between the Ptolemaic model (geocentric) and the Copernican model (heliocentric) was not accuracy but whether the Earth or Sun was at the centre. There was no way at that time of deciding which was correct, but Copernicus's model did not have such violent motion of Venus, which was one reason Galileo preferred it.
Eventually Kepler came up with an alternative system, and that is the one used today, because it is backed up by later theoretical discoveries of the law of gravity and the laws of motion.
There is only one Ptolemaic model of the Sun and planets, and it models the movement of the planets against the background of the 'fixed' stars.
The Ptolemaic model had the Earth at the centre and the Sun, Moon and planets rotating around circles and epicycles. It was a good model and it took over 1500 years for people to discover discrepancies in the planets' positions that it could not explain.
D. planets orbit in circular paths around the earth
D. planets orbit in circular paths around the earth if u dont believe me look it up pg 40
planets orbit in circular paths around the earth
Planets orbit in circular paths around the earth.
according to ptolemy,s model of of the movement of celestial bodies,
information about dates on which certain celestial bodies
Astronomist
asteroid
earth is a part of celestial bodies because of all the the bodies that caused earth to drop
No, a supernova is an explosion of a star. What left of a supernova are celestial bodies.
No Astronomers study celestial bodies
Dates on which celestial bodies were seen
A banana cannot be used to study the celestial bodies.
information about dates on which certain celestial bodies
Astronomist
no it does not
Astronomist
asteroid
Celestial bodies include stars, planets, galaxies, nebulae, comets, meteoroids, satellites, and asteroids.
earth is a part of celestial bodies because of all the the bodies that caused earth to drop
The force that attracts celestial bodies is the same force that keeps your feet on the ground. It's called gravity.
Yes, relative to other celestial bodies. Indeed by observing common movement factors of these other galaxies, we may deduce the rate of movement of our home Milky Way galaxy.