It ignored strategic intelligence when it created its policy agenda, but used tactical intelligence to implement its policy.
It used intelligence to justify decisions already made.
The Bush Administration made the mistake of using intelligence to justify decisions already made.
The Bush Administration made the mistake of using intelligence to justify decisions already made.
It ignored strategic intelligence when it created its policy agenda, but used tactical intelligence to implement its policy.
It ignored strategic intelligence when it created its policy agenda, but used tactical intelligence to implement its policy.
According to Professor Pillar's article about the war in Iraq the proper role of intelligence in the policy cycle is to inform decision making.To inform decision making (apex)
According to Professor Pillar's article about the war in Iraq the proper role of intelligence in the policy cycle is to inform decision making.To inform decision making (apex)
In Professor Pillar's article about the war in Iraq, he argues that the Bush administration misused intelligence by selectively emphasizing evidence that supported the case for invasion while downplaying or ignoring dissenting assessments. This manipulation of intelligence created a skewed narrative that justified military action based on the perceived threat of weapons of mass destruction. Consequently, the administration's policy decisions were not based on a comprehensive understanding of the situation, leading to significant geopolitical consequences.
great lakes
Here is the proper capitalization:The article was written by Professor Traudeau.The begins the sentence, so The is capitalized. Professor is part of the man's title. And Traudeau is a surname, which are always first-letter cap.
In Spanish, "professor" can be translated as "el profesor" for a male professor and "la profesora" for a female professor. The article used depends on the gender of the individual being referred to. Thus, use "el" for a male and "la" for a female professor.
Rule #1: ALWAYS consider the source; What are professor Pillar's credentials? 1. His aritlcle is most likely "subject specific"; meaning focusing on Iraq. If that's the situation then "Iraq" is the subject matter and must be considered: Iraq is a police action, meaning the restoration of law & order & stability within that particular region (nation/country). 2. US Gov't "intelligence" mission (encompasses US Military/CIA, etc.) has traditionally (prior to the end of the cold war & the new Homeland Security Department & the global war on terriorism) been for "National Security." The war against communism (the cold war) was such an example. 3. Is Professor Pillar's work concerning US "National Security"? If so, how is the restoration of Iraq's law & order within their boundaries necessary to America's National Security? Focus on #3 for debate.