alexander mmg
The name of the party formed by Alexander Hamilton was the Federalist party. The five beliefs of the party were that there should be a strong national government, a fear of mob rule, a loose interpretation of the Constitution, wanted a national bank, and the economy was based upon manufacturing and shipping.
fundamentalism
Alexander the Great was not gay, but perhaps bisexual based on our modern terminology, either way; Alexander III was definetely a great icon to behold and study!
In the House, it was based on Population of Citizens as established by the Constitution.
Britain doesn't have a written constitution but English law is based on the 1215 Magna Carta (Great Charter).
yes
Alexander Hamilton favored a loose interpretation of the Constitution, which allowed for a strong national government because Congress could pass laws based on the "elastic clause."
It was based on a loose interpretation of the Constitution because he wasn't really allowed to by the land, and he had to justify his actions by his hopes for the nation
It was based on a loose interpretation of the Constitution because he wasn't really allowed to by the land, and he had to justify his actions by his hopes for the nation
Unconstitutional
The name of the party formed by Alexander Hamilton was the Federalist party. The five beliefs of the party were that there should be a strong national government, a fear of mob rule, a loose interpretation of the Constitution, wanted a national bank, and the economy was based upon manufacturing and shipping.
a national bank, a limited national government, an economy based on farming, and the strict interpretation of the Constitution.
Alexander Hamilton (His idea of a National Bank was based of the fact that the constitution didn't explicitly prohibit it and therefore, it was constitutional.
Based on Christian interpretation, yes. Based on Jewish interpretation, no.
Much of the Constitution was based on the bible.
the u.s. constitution is based on the concept of?
It declared that slavery was legal in every state of the Union. This was an astonishing verdict (based on a particular interpretation of the Constitution) and it divided the two sections even further.