Unconstitutional
federal court
The Federal courts can review cases that question laws and decide if the laws are valid. NovaNet!!! The Judicial Branch of the U.S. Government has the authority to rule on any Act of Congress or Presidential action that violates the Constitution. Therefore, it acts as a "check" against unlawful legislation or actions by the other two branches.
Judicial review is the power to declare a government action that violates some provisions of the constitution to be null and void. This is as a result of the action being in contravention with the provisions of the constitution.
According to their constitution they do have rights. However, Chavez rules as a dictator and routinely violates constitutional rights.
A law that violates the Constitution must be overturned
Any practice or law that violates the constitution is unconstitutional.
it is the supreme court that has the final sayin whether or not an act of government-legislative or executive at the federal, state, or local level-violates the constitution.
Basically if it is passed into law by the Legislative Branch, adheres to the Constitution, and is signed by the head of the Executive Branch it is "valid." Any challenges to the law are addressed to the courts (Judicial Branch) for determination of ts validity and/or Constituionality.
Contrary to internet myth, the president has not violated the constitution.
To go against the constitution.
When a court strikes down a legislative act that violates the rights of individuals, it is exercising its power of judicial review. This action involves the court assessing the constitutionality of the law and determining that it conflicts with the rights protected by the constitution. By invalidating the law, the court reinforces the rule of law and protects individual rights against government overreach. This process underscores the judiciary's role as a check on legislative and executive powers.
its said to be unconstitutional
Courts
Courts
Courts
(in the US) The US Supreme Court.
Supreme Court