0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How personnel management developed into human resource management?
Personnel Management is a traditional approach started in the early part of the 20th century, in order to protect employees from industrial conditions, reacting to the influence of trade unions and ensuring all employees are treated and looked after fairly.
What was the duties of a personnel manager in the 19th century?
There are many definitions of personnel management, but all basically say that it is: attracting and developing competent employees and creating the organizational conditions which result in their full utilization and encourages them to put forth their best efforts. Two major points about personnel management are implied in this definition. First, effective personnel management must be future oriented. Support for organizational objectives now and for the foreseeable future must be provided through a steady supply of competent and capable employees. Second, effective personnel management is action oriented. The emphasis must be placed on solution of employment issues and problems to support organizational objectives and facilitate employee development and satisfaction.
What is the difference between Human Resource Management and Personnel Management?
There is not a really big difference between Human Resource Management and Personnel Management, in actual fact "Human Resources" have largely replaced the term "Personnel Management". Human Resource Management is basically much broader in scope than Personnel Management. Human Resource Management could be described in two ways. Strategic and Proactive. The reason being that there strategies are ongoing and they constantly work towards managing and developing an organisations workforce. It can be seen as Proactive because of their continuous development and functions to improve the company's workforce. Human Resource Management is the type of Management where almost everybody in Managing Position can play a part in Training and Development. They aim to have many different Managers in various departments with the necessary skills to handle employee tasks at hand. Personnel Management can be described as reactive. The reason why I would say this is because of the way they operate. An example of this would be that they respond to demands and concerns as they are presented. Personnel Management could also be seen as a independent way of managing. It is a sole responsibility of the organisation. Quoted: "When a difference between personnel management and human resources is recognized, human resources is described as much broader in scope than personnel management. Human resources is said to incorporate and develop personnel management tasks, while seeking to create and develop teams of workers for the benefit of the organization. A primary goal of human resources is to enable employees to work to a maximum level of efficiency. Personnel management can include administrative tasks that are both traditional and routine. It can be described as reactive, providing a response to demands and concerns as they are presented. By contrast, human resources involves ongoing strategies to manage and develop an organization's workforce. It is proactive, as it involves the continuous development of functions and policies for the purposes of improving a company's workforce. Personnel management is often considered an independent function of an organization. Human resource management, on the other hand, tends to be an integral part of overall company function. Personnel management is typically the sole responsibility of an organization's personnel department. With human resources, all of an organization's managers are often involved in some manner, and a chief goal may be to have managers of various departments develop the skills necessary to handle personnel-related tasks. As far as motivators are concerned, personnel management typically seeks to motivate employees with such things as compensation, bonuses, rewards, and the simplification of work responsibilities. From the personnel management point of view, employee satisfaction provides the motivation necessary to improve job performance. The opposite is true of human resources. Human resource management holds that improved performance leads to employee satisfaction. With human resources, work groups, effective strategies for meeting challenges, and job creativity are seen as the primary motivators."
What is the difference between personnel management and human resource management?
There is not a really big difference between Human Resource Management and Personnel Management, in actual fact "Human Resources" have largely replaced the term "Personnel Management". Human Resource Management is basically much broader in scope than Personnel Management. Human Resource Management could be described in two ways. Strategic and Proactive. The reason being that there strategies are ongoing and they constantly work towards managing and developing an organisations workforce. It can be seen as Proactive because of their continuous development and functions to improve the company's workforce. Human Resource Management is the type of Management where almost everybody in Managing Position can play a part in Training and Development. They aim to have many different Managers in various departments with the necessary skills to handle employee tasks at hand. Personnel Management can be described as reactive. The reason why I would say this is because of the way they operate. An example of this would be that they respond to demands and concerns as they are presented. Personnel Management could also be seen as a independent way of managing. It is a sole responsibility of the organisation. Quoted: "When a difference between personnel management and human resources is recognized, human resources is described as much broader in scope than personnel management. Human resources is said to incorporate and develop personnel management tasks, while seeking to create and develop teams of workers for the benefit of the organization. A primary goal of human resources is to enable employees to work to a maximum level of efficiency. Personnel management can include administrative tasks that are both traditional and routine. It can be described as reactive, providing a response to demands and concerns as they are presented. By contrast, human resources involves ongoing strategies to manage and develop an organization's workforce. It is proactive, as it involves the continuous development of functions and policies for the purposes of improving a company's workforce. Personnel management is often considered an independent function of an organization. Human resource management, on the other hand, tends to be an integral part of overall company function. Personnel management is typically the sole responsibility of an organization's personnel department. With human resources, all of an organization's managers are often involved in some manner, and a chief goal may be to have managers of various departments develop the skills necessary to handle personnel-related tasks. As far as motivators are concerned, personnel management typically seeks to motivate employees with such things as compensation, bonuses, rewards, and the simplification of work responsibilities. From the personnel management point of view, employee satisfaction provides the motivation necessary to improve job performance. The opposite is true of human resources. Human resource management holds that improved performance leads to employee satisfaction. With human resources, work groups, effective strategies for meeting challenges, and job creativity are seen as the primary motivators."
Difference between human resource management and personnel management?
Some experts assert that there is no difference between human resources and personnel management. They state that the two terms can be used interchangeably, with no difference in meaning. In fact, the terms are often used interchangeably in help-wanted ads and job descriptions. For those who recognize a difference between personnel management and human resources, the difference can be described as philosophical. Personnel management is more administrative in nature, dealing with payroll, complying with employment law, and handling related tasks. Human resources, on the other hand, is responsible for managing a workforce as one of the primary resources that contributes to the success of an organization. When a difference between personnel management and human resources is recognized, human resources is described as much broader in scope than personnel management. Human resources is said to incorporate and develop personnel management tasks, while seeking to create and develop teams of workers for the benefit of the organization. A primary goal of human resources is to enable employees to work to a maximum level of efficiency. Personnel management can include administrative tasks that are both traditional and routine. It can be described as reactive, providing a response to demands and concerns as they are presented. By contrast, human resources involves ongoing strategies to manage and develop an organization's workforce. It is proactive, as it involves the continuous development of functions and policies for the purposes of improving a company's workforce. Personnel management is often considered an independent function of an organization. Human resource management, on the other hand, tends to be an integral part of overall company function. Personnel management is typically the sole responsibility of an organization's personnel department. With human resources, all of an organization's managers are often involved in some manner, and a chief goal may be to have managers of various departments develop the skills necessary to handle personnel related tasks. As far as motivators are concerned, personnel management typically seeks to motivate employees with such things as compensation, bonuses, rewards, and the simplification of work responsibilities. From the personnel management point of view, employee satisfaction provides the motivation necessary to improve job performance. The opposite is true of human resources. Human resource management holds that improved performance leads to employee satisfaction. With human resources, work groups, effective strategies for meeting challenges, and job creativity are seen as the primary motivators.
How personnel management developed into human resource management?
Personnel Management is a traditional approach started in the early part of the 20th century, in order to protect employees from industrial conditions, reacting to the influence of trade unions and ensuring all employees are treated and looked after fairly.
What is industrial security definition?
The meaning of industrial security management is a concept that is used to protect the industrial machines and process. This provides a better understanding to the management for all security functions.
What has the author Earl C Pike written?
Earl C. Pike has written: 'We are all living with AIDS' -- subject(s): AIDS (Disease), Industrial hygiene, Personnel management
What is the meaning of industrial security?
The meaning of industrial security management is a concept that is used to protect the industrial machines and process. This provides a better understanding to the management for all security functions.
What is a personnel management?
A personnel manager is exactly like they sound like they would be. These managers help organize and direct all personnel within an organization or production.
What has the author P P Bhargava written?
P. P. Bhargava has written: 'Trade union dynamism' -- subject(s): All India Trade Union Congress, History, Labor policy, Trade union 'Issues in personnel management' -- subject(s): Law and legislation, Industrial relations, Industrial management, Labor unions, Employee participation
Is it personnel management is both a science and an art?
yes, all things are one
Which enlisted personnel management system function has the three components of manpower management accession and retention management and training integration?
Acquisition
How are US Congress members paid?
The U.S. Department of Treasury, Office of Personnel Management. The OPM handle all Federal Government wages. The checks are signed by the Director of the Office of Personnel Management.
Are all ross stores hiring?
All the Ross stores are hiring personnel for retail management, and supply chain.
Is there any different between management and personnel management?
Yes. Management means responsibility for decision-making in all aspects of business, not just in recruiting and training employees.
What are main characteristics of industrial relation system in India?
Trade unions, labor organizations and partnerships have all developed as a result of the industrial relation system in India. Employee participation and collective bargaining are also main characteristics of their system.
