A mass to be accelerated and a force to provide the acceleration.
Any change in speed or direction is a change in velocity. That's an acceleration,and it directly implies the presence of force, since it can't happen without force.
No, uniform angular velocity implies that an object is moving in a circle at a constant rate. Since acceleration is defined as any change in velocity (either speed or direction), if the angular velocity is constant, there is no acceleration present.
"Constant rate" implies there is no acceleration - acceleration is zero.
No. Velocity implies both a magnitude and a direction.No. Velocity implies both a magnitude and a direction.No. Velocity implies both a magnitude and a direction.No. Velocity implies both a magnitude and a direction.
A force causes an acceleration. That implies that it will change: * The velocity, and * The momentum.
A force causes an acceleration. That implies that it will change: * The velocity, and * The momentum.
In Simple motion, there is no force being applied. The moving object moves in a straight line with constant velocity. In acceleration, there is a force applied. The object's velocity is changing. The first derivative of acceleration is velocity. The first derivative of velocity is distance. (Derivative is a calculus thing.)
Yes, increasing acceleration means that the rate of change of velocity is increasing, which implies positive acceleration. Positive acceleration corresponds to speeding up, while negative acceleration (deceleration) corresponds to slowing down.
the multiplier principle implies that investment increases output whereas the acceleration principle implies that increases in output will themselves induce increases in investment.
Yes, the presence of hydrogen bonding in a substance implies the presence of dipole-dipole interactions as well.
"Acceleration" implies that the velocity changes.
acceleration