no because they can't cast spells. and its hardly possible to cast a spell.
Frank M. Quance has written: 'The Canadian speller' -- subject(s): Spellers 'New Canadian spellers' -- subject(s): Spellers 'Teacher's manual to the Canadian speller..' -- subject(s): Spellers
Robert W. Emery has written: 'Better spelling in 30 minutes a day' -- subject(s): Spellers
No, but if he is he hates bad spellers
Because some people on Answers.com are too lazy to take their time and spell correctly and even spell check their questions/answers.
No, cowboys are not better than Indians, though some might believe they are. Of course, others might believe Indians are better than cowboys.
spellers
Choctaw Indians different than Pueblo Indians, they are not same,pueblo Indians better then choctaw Indians.
TIGERS
Cincinnati reds are better
Richard Sterling has written: 'Our own second reader' -- subject(s): Readers (Primary), Readers 'Our own first reader' -- subject(s): Readers 'Our own second reader' -- subject(s): Readers 'Sterling's southern elementary spelling book' -- subject(s): Spellers 'Sterling's southern orator' -- subject(s): Elocution, Readers 'Our own spelling book' -- subject(s): Textbooks, Spellers 'Our own spelling book' -- subject(s): Spellers 'Our own spelling book' -- subject(s): Spellers
Before Indians America had no human population (and perhaps it was better).
I used to think people in Texas were good spellers.