I wouldn't say they are any better than if you were to get a VIZIO, or a Cannon. People have their own preferences. Personally I would vote for a Cannon digital camera. From personal experience I had one and I have had many different brands of names and by far the Cannon was the best!
I think that Kodak makes better, longer lasting cameras. I also think that they give you a better camera for the value.
yes. Kodak cameras are better quality pictures and Kodak has better camera designs than canon and sony and every other camera brands.
Same as we can not compare apple with orange. It depends on what you need.
more than 1
They fill the needs better than other cameras.
The Nikon DSLR cameras are high tech cameras that can take good pictures with enhanced quality. These cameras are high tech and capture images better than other cameras.
Canon digital sir is better than other sir cameras because it provides better pictures. The quality of the pictures is a lot clearer and easier to modify.
Ofcourse Nokia cameras are way better than Samsung cameras because Nokia uses Carl Zeiss Tessar optics which are used at NASA and Nokia also uses its own camera lenses
Hp cameras require a higher voltage of batteries than photosmart cameras. These are non-rechargeable batteries, so they can make a better choice. This URL address gives more informatioin. bizsupport1.austin.hp.com/.../Document.jsp?...lang...
Digital cameras aren't bad for us. They actually give much better results than Traditional or Film cameras.
Nikon is my personal favorite. Kodak is a good brand for the inexpensive camera market. i think that Kodak is the best i trust Kodak because they take good photos i have a Fuji digtal camera and is not as good as Kodak
You will benefit from panoramic digital cameras if you tend to take a lot of pictures of landscapes and other subject matter. Panoramic picture are twice the length than width and can give you a wider perspective of the image you are capturing. I would suggest the Hasselblad XPan.