Laws are neither explanations or hypotheses; they just state a fact. Laws can be considered as a consensus of observations on a particular phenomenon.
Builds and organizes in the form of testable explanations and hypotheses about the world.
Devising a hypotheses involves creating new explanations for phenomena.
It pursues those which are based on testable hypotheses. It does not ignore explanations, but will give less weight to those which are not based on experiment.
who was a nineteenth century monk whose hypotheses about inheritance in pea plants have became scientific laws
who was a nineteenth century monk whose hypotheses about inheritance in pea plants have became scientific laws
how are scientific laws formed
I'm not sure what "hypothisess" means. Did you mean "hypotheses"? Hypotheses are proposed explanations for a phenomenon that can be tested through research and observation. They are important in scientific inquiry as they help guide investigations and draw conclusions based on evidence.
relevant to a hypothesis, either positively or negatively. 2.2 Hypotheses and Sub-hypotheses Hypotheses are questions or conjectures of interest to an observer. Hypotheses may involve alternative possible explanations, possible answers, or alternative estimates. Hypotheses may have substructure. It is sometimes possible to partition a high-level hypothesis into a set of sub-hypotheses. The substructure decomposition is always a hierarchical tree. The hierarchy may be several levels deep before bottoming out in questions that can be directly assessed and answered by evidence.
theories can incorporate facts and laws and tested hypotheses
theories can incorporate facts and laws and tested hypotheses
W. Dray has written: 'Laws and explanations in history'
Causal explanations usually depend on a number of assumptions concerning physical laws.