No. South Dakota is larger with a total of 77,116 square miles while North Dakota has a total of 70,698 square miles.
No, slavery was not a part of the reason North Dakota and South Dakota split. North Dakota and South Dakota were part of the Dakota Territory from 1862 until statehood in 1889. The reasons North Dakota and South Dakota were split had to do with the population centers which, at the time, were several hundred miles apart and with the large size of the territory. There was also the fact that the Republicans wanted two states because that would add to their political power in the US Senate.
Germany is about the size of California, although a bit smaller.
north and south pacific
Bangladesh is 133,910 KM and South Dakota is 199,730 KM in size.
the average family size in South Dakota per house hold is 2.59
The same size as the east , north and south.
South Dakota is 55.6 times the size of Taiwan.
Bismarck is the state capital in North Dakota. The city's population was 61,272 at the 2010 census.
it has three
About the same size as Russia. 87,056 miles.
North Dakota ranks 19th in size by total area (land+water) with 70,699.79 square miles.
North Dakota is ranked as the 19th largest US state.