They absolutley are. In fact between Terminator and Terminator 2 Linda Hamilton worked out hard and pumped a lot of iron to get into shape for the role. As Sarah Conner evolved she felt that the character would get strong and stay strong. When Arnold Schwarzenegger first saw her on the set of Terminator 2 his response was "Linda! You're ripped to shreds!"
That depends entirely on the type of movie role. For an action or adventure movie, it would probably be a good idea. For a comedy, drama, or period film, then it's not necessary.
just because
In Shakespeare's time, women were not allowed to act on the stage. All female roles had to be done by boys or young men. Therefore the playwrights of that time were restricted in the number of women's roles they could write and still have convincing "actresses".In Shakespeare's time, women were not allowed to act on the stage. All female roles had to be done by boys or young men. Therefore the playwrights of that time were restricted in the number of women's roles they could write and still have convincing "actresses".In Shakespeare's time, women were not allowed to act on the stage. All female roles had to be done by boys or young men. Therefore the playwrights of that time were restricted in the number of women's roles they could write and still have convincing "actresses".In Shakespeare's time, women were not allowed to act on the stage. All female roles had to be done by boys or young men. Therefore the playwrights of that time were restricted in the number of women's roles they could write and still have convincing "actresses".In Shakespeare's time, women were not allowed to act on the stage. All female roles had to be done by boys or young men. Therefore the playwrights of that time were restricted in the number of women's roles they could write and still have convincing "actresses".In Shakespeare's time, women were not allowed to act on the stage. All female roles had to be done by boys or young men. Therefore the playwrights of that time were restricted in the number of women's roles they could write and still have convincing "actresses".In Shakespeare's time, women were not allowed to act on the stage. All female roles had to be done by boys or young men. Therefore the playwrights of that time were restricted in the number of women's roles they could write and still have convincing "actresses".In Shakespeare's time, women were not allowed to act on the stage. All female roles had to be done by boys or young men. Therefore the playwrights of that time were restricted in the number of women's roles they could write and still have convincing "actresses".In Shakespeare's time, women were not allowed to act on the stage. All female roles had to be done by boys or young men. Therefore the playwrights of that time were restricted in the number of women's roles they could write and still have convincing "actresses".
No, women weren't allowed to act in plays in England prior to the 1660s. Men or boys played the women's roles.
An action star is an actor or actress who specializes in roles in action movies.
The cast of Meebox - 2008 includes: Joanna Bobin as Various Roles Joanna Neary as Various Roles Emma Pierson as Actress on Space Movie
Movie directors and screen writers collaborate to create the desired personality types in the various roles of actors and actresses.
YES. its the best movie ever. theres action, romance, and humar. Ben Affleck and Jennifer Gardner played there roles very good. you should see it, its a must see.
The movie Mallrats had many good actors and actresses in it. Some people who played main roles were Tommy Vedein, Rachel Codale, and Samantha Saltire.
Young men whose voice had not yet cracked played the female roles back in the Elizabethan era. They did this because women were not allowed to act.
No, women's roles were played by young boys, although at times women would dress up as men to be allowed to play women's roles!
which of these actors played two roles in the movies