No, no and no. Amphibians are aquatic creatures but, they are amphibians. They breath through their skin, unlike the fish, who breath through their gills.
Don't trust me? I have a PhD in Herpetology and a masters in marine Biology.
Sent in by: Brevityman
No, they are not. They are fish and related to sharks
No, dinosaurs are more closely related to reptiles than amphibians. Both dinosaurs and reptiles belong to the group called diapsids, which are characterized by having two openings in the skull behind the eye socket. Amphibians, on the other hand, belong to a different group called tetrapods.
Fish are fish, their own group. Frogs are amphibians though.
Fish, and then amphibians, and then reptiles, and then mammals
No. Clownfish are fish. Amphibians include frogs, salamanders and caecilians.
Fish, reptiles, and amphibians, originated in that order during the Paleozoic era.
Fish
axotles = amphibians
Fish appeared earlier. Amphibians later branched off from them.
Fish aren't amphibians. Among other things, amphibians can breathe out of water, something most fish can't do.
the amphibians have a three chambered heart whilst the fish have a two chambered heart.
fish, specifically "mud" fish or lung fish.