Asteroids are by nature irregular shaped and do not fit into the classification of a planet. The largest asteroid, Ceres, is only classified as a dwarf planet.
The term planet is defined not by size alone. [See related question]
When it gets sucked into another planets gravitational pull, or something bigger than it.
planets are apart and help are solar system and asteroids hit are planets
Planets are generally larger than asteroids. Asteroids are small rocky bodies that orbit the Sun, while planets are larger celestial objects that have cleared their orbit of other debris. Some asteroids can be quite large, but they are still dwarfed by the size of planets.
No. Asteroids are smaller than even the smallest planets. Saturn is the second largest planet in the solar system.
Planets are larger and more massive than asteroids, but very nearly the same size and mass as planets.
lots of things are bigger than a astriod ,planets, somtimes a moon, and the biggest star in are solar system.
Asteroids, by definition, are much smaller than planets. That's one reason why they are mostly shaped irregular, unlike planets which are close to being round. The round shape is due to the increased mass (or weight) and only large masses tend to be round due to gravity.
meteroids
YES, 100 stars and 100 asteroids are larger than 250 planets
Yes. The difference is that a dwarf planet must have enough mass to have crushed it into a sphere under the influence of gravity.
the gas planets are bigger than the rocky planets
its the comets are smaller than planets, moons, and asteroids. In order of size, usually comets < asteroids < moons < planets