It depends on the scenario. A bomber with strong enough bombs can easily kill a tank, which would have difficulties destroying a bomber plane since the plane can fly. However, a tank totally can defeat a bomber on the ground.
yes they are possibly the most powerful tanks of all time
Yes - Junkers dive-bombers and massed tanks.
yes and because it is much stronger than plastic. its also an easy clean material
Advisery in the beginning, then guerrilla warfare, then conventional warfare with tanks and B-52 bombers.
With no US jets and bombers to stop them, the NVA rolled their tanks (T54/55 medium tanks) right through the South's capital gates in April '75.
Yes. A tank has strong heavy armor and a heavy weight that is great from getting crushed by helicopters or bombers.
Yes, but they mostly built Jeeps and, believe it or not, B-24 Liberator Bombers.
Radar, the atomic bomb, tanks, bombers, new dogfighting planes, and new weapons
not necessarily the word blitzkrieg means lightnlng war
A spherical water tank is stronger, as any forces, internally and externally, is spread around the surface evenly. Also, there is a weakness in cuboid shaped tanks at the seams and corners where the metal has been bent to form the squarish shape.
The Vietnam War started out with small guerrilla warfare, then grew into conventional battles with tanks and B-52 Bombers.
sonic is stronger than knuckles yes he is stronger than vector