To answer this philosophically...
Some people believe that the ability to learn is innate, which means that concepts such as maths, language etc. are already present in you before you're born. So a Rationalist would say that you are born with the ability to learn, perhaps even before you are born.
The other side of this argument, the empiricists believe that there are no innate ideas and that your mind is born as a blank slate with no knowledge or ideas. So you learn from experience.
The Language Acquisition Device (LAD) is a theoretical concept introduced by Noam Chomsky to explain how children have an innate ability to acquire language. According to Chomsky, children are born with a cognitive mechanism that allows them to quickly and effortlessly learn the grammar and rules of any language they are exposed to during their critical period of language development.
Everyone is born with the ability to cry. It is not something you learn. It is a basic bodily function that (nearly) everyone can do.
Nope - the hunt instinctively. They are born with the ability to search out prey.
It was a natural instinct. saiyans are BORN with the ability to take flight.
A child learns through a combination of observation, imitation, repetition, and practice. They also learn through exploration, play, interaction with others, and receiving guidance and feedback from caregivers and educators. Additionally, cognitive development theories such as Piaget's stages of development and Vygotsky's social constructivism help explain how children learn and acquire new skills.
a language acquistion device
Noam Chomsky proposes that the brain structure responsible for our innate ability to learn languages is the Language Acquisition Device (LAD). This hypothetical module is believed to be genetically endowed and assists in the acquisition of language in early childhood.
No, since they are not born with the understanding that there are other people. However, people are born with the capacity to learn interpersonal skills, which they must do when they are quite young. Children who grew to their teens without having other people around them cannot be taught interpersonal skills, because they are too old. Some conditions, like autism, can seriously impair a person's ability to learn such skills, and obviously, some people learn them better and more thoroughly than others.
Because they are trying to learn from right to wrong. Children are not meant to be born perfect.
Human beings are born with an innate ability to learn language; we are preprogrammed to acquire any language we are sufficiently exposed to before puberty. By listening and discerning meaning from context, children quickly pick up passive language skills by age 1, and from there acquire language at a break-neck pace so that by age 4 most children speak their native languages with full native fluency.
because their always getting stepped on until they learn to take anitiative.
It could take months or years, but only until you get the hang of it. From, Bryan Hollick