No, diamonds are pure diamond, not a mixture of anything.
i think diamonds are a compound.
Diamonds are formed from pure carbon.
Both diamond and graphite are allotropes of pure carbon.
A diamond is not a compound; it is formed from carbon. Even though there are trace amounts of other minerals in diamonds -- such as nitrogen, which gives diamonds a yellow case -- diamond is not a compound, because the trace minerals cannot be separated out. (According to Wikipedia: "A chemical compound is a pure chemical substance consisting of two or more different chemical elements that can be separated into simpler substances by chemical reactions.")
Compound, crystal is not an element so obviously what it is made up of must be a compound <><><><> Crystals can be either an element (diamonds are carbon- and crystalline) or a compound (salt, sugar). Unsure of your meaning of "broken down".
No, diamonds do not contain calcium carbonate. Diamonds are composed of carbon atoms arranged in a crystal lattice structure, while calcium carbonate is a compound made up of calcium, carbon, and oxygen atoms.
Emeralds are compound of Boron, Aluminum and silicate. They are far less tougher than diamonds. Measured on mosh scale of hardness for minerals emeralds value is less than 8.0. On the same scale hardness of diamonds is 10.00
No. Diamonds are pure carbon but quartz is the compound silicon dioxide.
No, it is a crystalline form of carbon. Evidence? On chemical analysis, it contains nothing but carbon. Diamonds can be made from carbon.
No, diamonds are not ionic compounds. Diamonds are made entirely of carbon atoms covalently bonded to each other in a crystal lattice structure. Ionic compounds are formed when atoms of different elements are held together by ionic bonds, in which electrons are transferred from one atom to another.
Diamonds Diamonds was created in 1982.
Kiran diamonds are manufactured diamonds: real, manufactured diamonds.