yes, in fact many of the names of bones are the same
No (human)bones and fish bone aren't alike. Fish bone is very thin, weigh less and is smaller than human bones.
human bones are cir muted with FLESH but fish bones isn't
a fish bone is more brittle I THINK!!!!!!!
The number of bones that a fish has is dependent upon the type of fish. Some fish do not have any bones, while other fish have hundreds of bones.
Most fish have bones. Sharks and rays do not have bones but they do have bone-like structures that are made from cartilage.
No they are cartilaginous fish, meaning that they have cartilage instead of bones for their skeleton.
All animals at different, so it has to be a specific animal. Generally a human has a different skull. If the animal is an invertebrate, the human skeleton would have a spine whereas the invertebrate would not.
Yes, it can be. You can bone a fish, which means to remove its bones in preparation for eating it.
No. Fish bone does no meet the definition of a mineral because it is organic. In fossils of fish bones the bone has been replaced by a mineral.
Of course fishes have bones. How else would they swim to your bait when you go fishing?
Infact, for size all bones are much stronger thatn concrete. About 8 times. They're flexible, lightweight and super hard. Yet will break if alot of force is given. A thigh bone can withstand about a tonne of stress before snapping. This depening on a person's health. The lower joint of a femur, pretty much impossible to break with a hammer, yet hollow bones will break with a brick, slab of concrete or a hammer. Imagine a bit of concrete the size of a bone, it would break easily... Wouldn't it?
No, chondrichthyes are fish that have skeletons made out of cartilage instead of bone.
Eels are fish, and fish have a skeleton. Note, however, that the skeletons of fish are not composed of "bone" as we know it, but of cartilage.