no
Reptiles are neither mammals nor fish. Taxonomically, they are more closely related to mammals.
Reptiles are more closely related to mammals than to fishes. Reptiles and mammals are both part of the group called amniotes, characterized by their ability to lay eggs on land. Fish, on the other hand, are a separate group with distinct evolutionary lineages from reptiles and mammals.
Fish because Fish are animals that live in water and reptiles come from that region.
Dinosaurs are more closely related to mammals. Both mammals and dinosaurs share a reptilian ancestor that they don't share with amphibians.
Bats and bears . . . they're both mammals. A bird isn't.
No. Mammals evolved from synapsid reptiles, a group not closely related to dinosaurs. Dinosaurs are more closely related to modern reptiles and birds than they are to mammals.
Giraffe are not closely related to dinosaurs, the dinosaurs are reptiles, giraffe are mammals. But of course they are more closely related than are mammals and shellfish...
Reptiles
No. Dinosaurs were not mammals. They were more closely related to birds and modern reptiles than they were to mammals.
Mammals are distantly related to birds. Oddly, if you look at an evolutionary tree, birds are actually more closely related to reptiles than they are to mammals.
Since they are vertebrates, they are most closely related to fish.
Not at all. Giraffes are mammals, which are not closely related to dinosaurs. Dinosaurs are more closely related to birds and modern reptiles.