Yes, in one sense. In the old days gold was mined by sight. Today through advanced washing technologies, micro gold, or fine gold can be recovered and washed out of the dirt. In this sense, old mines are the best bet possible for future micro mining projects, and are therefore somewhat of a renewable resource.
Gold mines in the western US are not considered renewable resources because they are formed over geologic timescales through deposits of gold-bearing minerals. Once these deposits are depleted through mining activities, it is not feasible for them to be regenerated within a human timeframe.
Only if you put the gold back where you found it.
Yes, gold is considered a non-renewable resource because it is a finite material that cannot be replaced once it is extracted from the Earth. The rate of gold mining far exceeds the rate at which new gold is formed, making it a non-renewable resource.
Any is a renewable resource but we have sufficient nitrogen in the atmosphere.
Gold
oil, copper, and gold
It is a nonrenewable resource.
They are all non-renewable resources.
Non-Renewable or Precious Metal
See the related links for images of gold mines at Kalgoorlie, Western Australia.
Western Australia has about half of Australia's working gold mines.
A renewable resource is one which does not get used up. Sunlight is a very important resource upon which we depend for many things, but no matter what uses we may make of sunlight, we do not use it up; the sun shines just as brightly. Similarly, we can use rain in whatever way we like, and there will always be more rain. In comparison, something such as a gold mine is not renewable. Once you dig out all the gold, it is gone, there is no more in that particular mine, and there are only a limited number of mines available. It is possible to mine all the gold in the world, and have nothing more to mine.