No, they are not legal satutes; but a journalist who violates them can find himself blackballed by the journalism community pretty quickly.
I'm not Australian, but as a general rule you can state that a profession's Code of Ethics is NOT legally binding on anyone. They are usually nothing but high sounding principles and ideals which one is supposed to strive towards, adhere to, and uphold, in the performance of their particular profession or endeavor.
Very little really. In essence they are both the same - a non-binding statement of the ethics and performnace to which the organization aspires to hold itself. It is not legally binding.
No, information that is "off the record" is not legally binding. It is an agreement between the parties involved, but it does not hold the same weight as a legally binding contract.
Sealed or not, if the bid was offered and it was accepted, yes, it is legally binding.
yes, If the parties involved agree that the decision made will be legally binding
Yes, a text message can be legally binding if it meets the requirements for a contract, such as offer, acceptance, and consideration, and if both parties intend for it to be legally binding.
mediation can be binding if a representative is used if not then its not binding snzbeyueen
A document is legally binding if it has been notarized by a licensed notary. It is also legally binding if it has been filed in court.
no they are not
a contract is LEGALLY BINDING, an agreement is not necessarily legally binding depending on the circumstances
Yes, a 12 year old can form a legally binding contract.
A contract is a legally binding agreement between two or more parties.