No, a knight's outfit was his armour. The coat of arms were the identifying symbols painted on his shield or on his flag
No, a coat of arms is a unique heraldic design displayed on a shield or banner. Knights typically wear armor or suits of armor, which are protective clothing made of metal plates or pieces. The coat of arms is a symbol of identity and lineage, while the armor is for protection in battle.
Usually they used the coat of arms of their familly.
knights used coats of arms to alow themselves to be reconized in battle.
Heraldy is pretty much a coat of arms, and knights used it to identify different kingdoms
the eagle on the Indonesian coat of arms is called Garuda
The symbol on the knight's shield was his family's coat of arms.
it was used to protect theirselves in battle or show pride in their families.
Knights fought on horseback using swords, lances (long poles), axes, and vicious weapons called morning stars. Each knight wore a symbol called a coat of arms, to show witch family he belongs to
Using a coat of arms on their shield or lance, a sort of emblem.
Sorry, but there is no such thing as a Family Coat of Arms.
HI. Elephant is also the arms of one of the Arthur's knights. JC Even Historian Breton searcher. MARIKAVEL@wanadoo.fr.
There were many types of 'coat of arms' for a long long time, but the custom was fully developed by the middle ages. It is argued that the different designs on ancient pottery was the official first documented coat of arms. found here: http://www.historicalnames.com/origins.htm
fess