Usually they used the coat of arms of their familly.
knights used coats of arms to alow themselves to be reconized in battle.
Heraldy is pretty much a coat of arms, and knights used it to identify different kingdoms
No, a coat of arms is a unique heraldic design displayed on a shield or banner. Knights typically wear armor or suits of armor, which are protective clothing made of metal plates or pieces. The coat of arms is a symbol of identity and lineage, while the armor is for protection in battle.
The symbol on the knight's shield was his family's coat of arms.
it was used to protect theirselves in battle or show pride in their families.
Using a coat of arms on their shield or lance, a sort of emblem.
Sorry, but there is no such thing as a Family Coat of Arms.
HI. Elephant is also the arms of one of the Arthur's knights. JC Even Historian Breton searcher. MARIKAVEL@wanadoo.fr.
There were many types of 'coat of arms' for a long long time, but the custom was fully developed by the middle ages. It is argued that the different designs on ancient pottery was the official first documented coat of arms. found here: http://www.historicalnames.com/origins.htm
The plural of "coat of arms" is "coats of arms".
japan does not have a coat of arms
The coat of arms for Laos