nja si det
the Songhai empire was defeated due to the lack of modern use of weapons by the Songhai military
Highly trained troops, modern weapons, well organized, money.
No, i think modern warfare 2 is better because there are new weapons and perks, and most importantly, silenced snipers.The answer to the question is more about opinion.Modern Warfare 2 does have better weapons and perks, but some of the perks in CoD4 are needed.
meieval wepons are melee wepons modern wepons have bullets and you dont have to hit people and also melee
A gladius-wielding gladiator might have difficulty attacking a man armed with an AK-47.
Military build-ups included increase of modern weapons; increased military budgets; build-up of navies, and fortification of boundaries.
Call of duty modern warfare 2 is better than socom because with modern warfare 2 you have better weapons and you run faster on the game. I agree it is way better!
Military defense spending :) (Decrease in weapons) -Apex-
Military defense spending :) (Decrease in weapons) -Apex-
modern tanks are better than ww1 tanks in every way there faster have better armour better weapons one of the main differences is that modern tanks have a rotating turret
There are no modern weapons similar to the Zeppelin.
An example of modern military innovations is the use of drones by the US in Somalia to flush out terrorist groups out of their cells; the drones are unmanned and therefore human causality is minimal.