nja si det
the Songhai empire was defeated due to the lack of modern use of weapons by the Songhai military
Highly trained troops, modern weapons, well organized, money.
No, i think modern warfare 2 is better because there are new weapons and perks, and most importantly, silenced snipers.The answer to the question is more about opinion.Modern Warfare 2 does have better weapons and perks, but some of the perks in CoD4 are needed.
meieval wepons are melee wepons modern wepons have bullets and you dont have to hit people and also melee
A gladius-wielding gladiator might have difficulty attacking a man armed with an AK-47.
Call of duty modern warfare 2 is better than socom because with modern warfare 2 you have better weapons and you run faster on the game. I agree it is way better!
Military build-ups included increase of modern weapons; increased military budgets; build-up of navies, and fortification of boundaries.
Military defense spending :) (Decrease in weapons) -Apex-
Military defense spending :) (Decrease in weapons) -Apex-
modern tanks are better than ww1 tanks in every way there faster have better armour better weapons one of the main differences is that modern tanks have a rotating turret
There are no modern weapons similar to the Zeppelin.
Probably some of the originals but designed to look a lot better then they did in MW2. You might see some newer weapons which are yet to be announced.